Skip to content

Mini-trampoline Intervention vs. Nordic Walking: Balance, Fitness and Neuropsychological Effects

Comparison of 12-week Mini-trampoline Intervention With a Nordic Walking Intervention: Balance, Fitness and Neuropsychological Effects

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02596152
Acronym
TraWaFit
Enrollment
54
Registered
2015-11-04
Start date
2015-08-31
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2020-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overweight, Obesity

Keywords

balance, strength, barriers towards exercise, quality of life, body dissatisfaction, executive functions, eating behavior, fitness

Brief summary

The effects of mini-trampoline training on balance, cardiorespiratory fitness, strength and neuropsychological parameters in an overweight or obese population are unknown. The aim of this 2-arm randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of a 12-week mini-trampoline training and a 12-week nordic walking training on balance, fitness and strength in overweight/obese individuals.

Detailed description

A growing body of literature suggests, that obesity is not only associated with medical conditions such as diabetes, but also linked to altered gait, impaired balance and a greater likelihood of falls. Weight reduction has been shown to improve balance controle. Methods to increase physical activity are largely not accepted in this population and those which conserve the musculoskeletal system are rare. Physical activity has been shown to influence mood, quality of life and eating behavior. Mini-trampoline training has been shown to enhance stability and increase fitness.

Interventions

OTHERmini-trampoline

Intervention period lasts 12 weeks, training is group instructed, twice weekly. Training sessions are one hour each. The training intensity of the two interventional arms is comparable. The training progression is defined in advance.

Intervention period lasts 12 weeks, training is group instructed, twice weekly. Training sessions are one hour each. The training intensity of the two interventional arms is comparable. The training progression is defined in advance.

Sponsors

Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-55 years * Body Mass Index ≥25 kg/m2 * ≤ 1h regular exercise/ physical activity per week

Exclusion criteria

* cardiovascular or other chronic diseases not permitting sports participation * inability to follow the procedures of the study (e.g. due to dementia) * neurological disorders limiting balance or medications impairing balance * hypertensive blood pressure not permitting exercise (\>180/100 mmHg) * medication: beta-blocking agents which reduce cardiac adaption abilities to exercise * known pregnancy with contraindications for exercise according to the guidelines of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postural swayassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)COPspeed (Center of pressure speed measured on a force plate in cm/sec) measured on a force plate in quiet stance with eyes closed

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
submaximal heart rate at 50 Wattsassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(HR at 50 Watts in beats/min)
maximal workassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(Watts on bicycle ergometer)
dynamic core strengthassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(Nm/kg on dynamometer)
lower body explosive strengthassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(seconds on chair rise test)
lower body functional enduranceassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(repetitions during 30-second-chair rise test)
isokinetic plantar flexion strengthassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(Nm/kg on dynamometer)
functional balanceassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(cm in reach test)
body fat massassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(in kg)
waist circumferenceassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(in cm)
peak oxygen uptakeassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(VO2 peak in ml/kg/min)
moodassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(score on multidimensional mood questionnaire)
weight adjusted quality of lifeassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(score on IWQOL questionnaire)
body dissatisfactionassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(score on Figure Rating Scale)
eating behaviorassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(score on FEV questionnaire)
attentionassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(score on the digit span test)
cognitive flexibilityassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(seconds during the Trail making test)
executive planning functionassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(score in the Tower of London Test (computer based version))
behavioral shift and inhibitionassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(number of mistakes in the Inhib Test (computer based version))
body muscle massassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(in kg)
motivation and barriersassessed twice: before and after the intervention (12 weeks)(score on questionnaire)

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026