Skip to content

Propranolol Dose Escalation in Lymphedema in Patients

An Intra-patient Dose Escalation Study of Propranolol in Patients With Lymphedema

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02595996
Enrollment
1
Registered
2015-11-04
Start date
2017-06-07
Completion date
2020-10-08
Last updated
2021-10-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Lymphedema

Brief summary

This is a study to investigate the safety and efficacy of propranolol in the treatment of patients with primary lymphedema. The primary goal is to assess patient tolerability of increasing doses of propranolol. The secondary goal is to assess lymphedema symptoms and signs in response to propranolol treatment.

Detailed description

Lymphatic malformations (LMs) arise from abnormal development of lymphatic vasculature. Primary lymphedema is considered a form of LM. Recently, results in the investigators' laboratory demonstrated that propranolol, a pan beta-adrenergic receptor (βAR) antagonist, had cytotoxic and anti-proliferative effects against cells isolated from LM tissues. Preliminary results from treating symptomatic LM patients with propranolol at a dose range from 0.7-1mg/kg/day demonstrated a 70% positive response rate, with patients reporting improvement in their symptoms. Propranolol has been used for different indications for many years. Propranolol is accepted for use in infants with hemangiomas and supraventricular tachycardia. Hemangeol was approved by the FDA for use in infants with hemangiomas. However, βAR antagonists are not without potential adverse effects, including hypotension, bradycardia, hypoglycemia, bronchospasms, and sleep disturbances. FDA-approved dose range for treating hemangiomas in infants (\>5 weeks old, \>2kg) ranged from 1-3mg/kg/day in divided doses. Propranolol doses of up to 4mg/kg/day has been used for pediatric supraventricular tachycardia. Therefore, the investigator's experience with propranolol use in LM patients have been at the low end of most accepted clinical indications. The investigators propose to escalate propranolol dosages up to 3mg/kg/day in this study, well below the dose ranges currently used in clinical settings. This dose range of 0.7-1mg/kg/day was chosen for LM patients as it was the low end of dose range for infants treated with propranolol for problematic hemangiomas, a related vascular anomaly. At this dose, no significant hemodynamic adverse effects were noted in LM patients. However, when patients stopped propranolol or their dose fell below 0.7mg/kg/day, they suffered rebound worsening of their symptoms. Moreover, inflammatory events such as infections temporarily overcame the effects of 0.7-1mg/kg/day of propranolol. Thus, it is unknown whether maximum propranolol efficacy was achieved at the current dose range. The investigators propose to examine whether optimized propranolol usage for treatment of LM patients has been achieved. The primary endpoint for this study is to ascertain whether LM patients can tolerate higher doses of propranolol, as measured by known propranolol adverse effects and patient-reported symptoms. A secondary endpoint will address whether patient-reported LM symptoms and quality of life are improved with higher doses of propranolol; objective findings such as LM size on physical examination and imaging studies will be analyzed as well. In addition, LM tissue biopsies will acquired from patients before and after propranolol treatment for further analyses of disease progression.

Interventions

DRUGPropranolol

escalating doses of propranolol from 1mg/kg/day to 2mg/kg/day to 3mg/kg/day

Sponsors

Columbia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Primary lymphedema * Measurable disease * Adequate functional status: Karnofsky \>50% (\>age 16), Lanky \>50 (\<age 16), * No prior therapy within 4 weeks of enrollment * Adequate bone marrow, renal function, cardiac, and pulmonary function, negative pregnancy test (for women).

Exclusion criteria

* Secondary lymphedema * Patients already receiving other investigational drugs * Patients with known contraindications to receiving propranolol * Other medical comorbidities including but not limited to: pheochromocytoma, bradycardia, bronchospasm/reactive airway disease, decompensated heart failure, heart block, ongoing active infections.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients That Tolerated Propranolol8 weeksTo assess whether patients tolerated propranolol

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Improved Quality of Life Based on Self-reported Questionnaires8 weeksTo assess subjective lymphedema symptoms improvements only - whether patients' general quality of life symptoms improved on propranolol treatment by self-reported questionnaires (SF 36)
Number of Patients With Decreased Fluid Retention by Weight8 weeksTo assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol by weight (BMI kg/m\^2) - objective signs of improvement of their lymphedema
Number of Patients With Lower Limb Discrepancy8 weeksTo assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol by limb girth discrepancy measurement (%) - objective signs of improvement of their lymphedema
Number of Patients With Decreased Fluid Retention on MRIbaseline to 8 weeksTo assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol - the decrease in fluid retention will be calculated by the measurement of fat (a number) divide by the measurement of fluid (a number) to yield a ratio - if a patient has a lower ratio at 8 weeks than at baseline, they will be reported in this category.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment
Patients will be given propranolol in escalating doses Propranolol: escalating doses of propranolol from 1mg/kg/day to 2mg/kg/day to 3mg/kg/day
1
Total1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients That Tolerated Propranolol

To assess whether patients tolerated propranolol

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Study terminated due to lack of funding. Data was not analyzed or disclosed due to subject confidentiality being an issue (n=1).

Secondary

Number of Patients With Decreased Fluid Retention by Weight

To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol by weight (BMI kg/m\^2) - objective signs of improvement of their lymphedema

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Study terminated due to lack of funding. Data was not analyzed or disclosed due to subject confidentiality being an issue (n=1).

Secondary

Number of Patients With Decreased Fluid Retention on MRI

To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol - the decrease in fluid retention will be calculated by the measurement of fat (a number) divide by the measurement of fluid (a number) to yield a ratio - if a patient has a lower ratio at 8 weeks than at baseline, they will be reported in this category.

Time frame: baseline to 8 weeks

Population: Study terminated due to lack of funding. Data was not analyzed or disclosed due to subject confidentiality being an issue (n=1).

Secondary

Number of Patients With Improved Quality of Life Based on Self-reported Questionnaires

To assess subjective lymphedema symptoms improvements only - whether patients' general quality of life symptoms improved on propranolol treatment by self-reported questionnaires (SF 36)

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Study terminated due to lack of funding. Data was not analyzed or disclosed due to subject confidentiality being an issue (n=1).

Secondary

Number of Patients With Lower Limb Discrepancy

To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol by limb girth discrepancy measurement (%) - objective signs of improvement of their lymphedema

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Study terminated due to lack of funding. Data was not analyzed or disclosed due to subject confidentiality being an issue (n=1).

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026