Cleft Palate, Jaw Abnormalities, Maxillofacial Abnormalities, Mouth Abnormalities, Congenital Abnormalities, Jaw Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Craniofacial Abnormalities, Musculoskeletal Abnormalities, Stomatognathic Diseases, Stomatognathic System Abnormalities
Conditions
Keywords
Risk Recall, Pamphlet, Brochure, Patient satisfaction, Informed Consent
Brief summary
To determine if providing a written document in addition to the standard oral discussion of surgical risks improves risk recall for the parents/guardians of a child seen in consultation for cleft palate surgery, and if this has any effect on overall satisfaction after the procedure
Detailed description
The current standard of care as it relates to informed consent in the pediatric population involves providing the parents or guardians of the child undergoing surgery with an oral discussion prior to the surgical procedure. However, providing parents with an oral discussion alone may be insufficient in the informed consent process as it has been shown that oral information tends to be retained poorly and crucial pieces of information tend to be forgotten. Conversely, it has been shown that properly informed patients are more satisfied, have a higher commitment to their treatment, and demonstrate less tendency toward filing legal claims. Furthermore, written material may help reduce anxiety in patients facing stressful events, such as surgery, and have been linked with overall improvement in satisfaction with their treatment The investigators hypothesize that providing a written document in conjunction with the standard oral discussion improves the participants' risk recall in the informed consent process for their child's cleft palate repair surgery and increases their subjective satisfaction with the operation.
Interventions
Written pamphlet outlining the risks of surgery as discussed in consultation.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Parents/guardians of a child referred to the IWK Cleft Palate Clinic for primary cleft palate repair surgery
Exclusion criteria
* Inability to fluently communicate in English * Inability to read at a grade 8 level * Inability to provide informed consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of risks recalled | 3 weeks | The number of risks that are recalled by the patient at a 3 week follow up phone call. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Participant Satisfaction as measured with the visual-analogue scale | 3 months | Participants' perceived satisfaction with the procedure as measured with the visual-analogue scale. |
Countries
Canada