Skip to content

Study Assessing the Reduction of Pain Felt During Installation Intra- Uterine Device by Direct Technique

Comparative Study, Prospective, Randomized , Assessing the Reduction of Pain Felt During Installation Intra- Uterine Device by Direct Technique. A Monocentric Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02595125
Acronym
DIRECTE
Enrollment
60
Registered
2015-11-03
Start date
2016-02-24
Completion date
2017-07-19
Last updated
2018-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Contraception

Keywords

intrauterine device, contraceptive method, direct technique, torpedo technique, verbal numeric scale

Brief summary

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are contraceptive methods of long-acting (from 3 to 10 years depending on the model) and among the most effective. However, there are many obstacles to the use of IUDs including pain felt by patients during installation. Several medical means were studied without evidence of their efficacy in pain related to IUD insertion. In order to remove this brake, it's important to find another way to act against this pain. The direct technique is one of the techniques described by health professionals. It seems trusted by its users as a more reliable technique but also less painful for patients. However, there is no study available on its evaluation. The aim of this study is to investigate the interest of the direct technique in reducing the pain experienced by patients during installation.

Interventions

DEVICEIUD

copper IUD or levonogestrel IUD insert by the conventional technique or by direct technique

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any major patient and consultant for IUD insertion : hormonal or copper * Signing of the information and consent form by the patient or, if under supervision by parents or guardian. * Patient affiliated with or entitled to a social security scheme * No contraindication for IUD insertion

Exclusion criteria

* Patient consultant for IUD insertion to side arms * Contraindications for installation. * Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity. Medical or psychological conditions not allowing the subject to understand the study and sign the consent * Refusal to sign the consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain measured by Verbal Numeric ScaleintraoperativePain is score by Verbal Numeric Scale : 0-10 (0 = no pain; 10= pain as bad as can be)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of vagal discomfortintraoperative
Number of expulsion of the IUDintraoperative
Number of IUD-fond uterine distance >2 cmintraoperative
Number of failure laying direct techniqueintraoperative
Number of emergency department visit for a IUD complicationup to 7 days
Number of analgesic intakeup to 7 days post-insertion
Pain measured by Verbal Numeric Scaleday 1Pain is score by Verbal Numeric Scale : 0-10 (0 = no pain; 10= pain as bad as can be)
Number of expulsion of IUDup to 7 days

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026