Skip to content

Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Targeted Therapy Fatigue (CBT-TTF) Intervention

Preliminary Evaluation of an Internet-Assisted Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Targeted Therapy Fatigue

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02592447
Enrollment
48
Registered
2015-10-30
Start date
2015-09-29
Completion date
2021-09-02
Last updated
2021-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

Keywords

CML, chronic phase CML, leukemia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Targeted Therapy Fatigue (CBT-TTF) with fatigued chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for feasibility, acceptability and potential efficacy relative to usual care only in a small-scale randomized controlled trial.

Interventions

OTHERTherapy for Targeted Therapy-related Fatigue (TTF)

Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Targeted Therapy-related Fatigue (CBT-TTF) group will receive cognitive behavior therapy to help manage fatigue via FaceTime on an iPad, which will be provided to participants. Participants will meet with a trained therapist who will outline their therapy plan and will be taught how to use the iPad for upcoming therapy sessions. The sessions will initially be held weekly, but the therapist may schedule sessions at 1-, 2-, or 3-week intervals during the 18 week study period. The final session will be conducted either in-person at Moffitt or via FaceTime.

OTHERWait-List Control Condition (WLC)

Participants randomized to Wait-List Control Condition will continue to receive care under direction of their Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) physician. Physicians will be informed by email of patients' participation on the basis of elevated fatigue and their randomization to WLC. Chart review and a patient self-report form will be used at baseline and follow-up assessments to determine what, if any, services or interventions participants received in the preceding 18 weeks that might address fatigue.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* able to speak/read English * diagnosed with chronic phase CML * not have been treated for other cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer) in the past 5 years * be under the care of a Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) physician * be on a stable dose of the same oral TKI for \>= 3 months * new onset or worsening of fatigue since starting TKI * report moderate-severe fatigue in past week (FSI average rating \>= 4 of 0-10) * have no clinical history of disease (e.g., multiple sclerosis, fibromyalgia) that could account for their fatigue presentation

Exclusion criteria

* scheduled to discontinue their TKI under medical supervision within the next 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-reported Fatigue Scores - Change From Baseline Per Scoring CategoryBaseline and at 18 weeksBaseline versus follow-up fatigue will be assessed with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) v.4, a 13-item self-report measure yielding total score with demonstrated reliability, validity, sensitivity to change and an identified Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MID). The fatigue subscale consists of 13 items asking about fatigue in the past 7 days. Items are summed to produce a score ranging from 0-52 with lower scores indicating greater fatigue. A difference of 3 points on the fatigue subscale indicates a clinically-important difference.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-reported Quality of Life (QoL) Scores - Change From Baseline Per Scoring CategoryBaseline and at 18 weeksBaseline versus follow-up quality of life will be assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General Scale (FACT-G) v.4, a 27-item measure yielding total score and scores for physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being of demonstrated reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. FACT-G consists of 4 subscales: physical well-being (PWB), functional well-being (FWB), emotional well-being (EWB) and social well-being (SWB). Scores on the four subscales are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 108 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Of 48 consented, 4 never completed questionnaires.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)
Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Targeted Therapy-related Fatigue (CBT-TTF) to help manage fatigue via FaceTime on an iPad, which will be provided to participants. Participants will meet with a trained therapist who will outline their therapy plan and will be taught how to use the iPad for upcoming therapy sessions. Therapy for Targeted Therapy-related Fatigue (TTF): Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Targeted Therapy-related Fatigue (CBT-TTF) group will receive cognitive behavior therapy to help manage fatigue via FaceTime on an iPad, which will be provided to participants. Participants will meet with a trained therapist who will outline their therapy plan and will be taught how to use the iPad for upcoming therapy sessions. The sessions will initially be held weekly, but the therapist may schedule sessions at 1-, 2-, or 3-week intervals during the 18 week study period. The final session will be conducted either in-person at Moffitt or via FaceTime.
29
Wait-List Control Condition (WLC)
Wait-List Control Condition (WLC) group will not receive therapy sessions and will continue usual care with their providers. This group will be offered the same cognitive behavior therapy as the group receiving the CBT-TTF intervention, after the 18 week study period. Wait-List Control Condition (WLC): Participants randomized to Wait-List Control Condition will continue to receive care under direction of their Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) physician. Physicians will be informed by email of patients' participation on the basis of elevated fatigue and their randomization to WLC. Chart review and a patient self-report form will be used at baseline and follow-up assessments to determine what, if any, services or interventions participants received in the preceding 18 weeks that might address fatigue.
15
Total44

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyIneligible after randomization10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)TotalWait-List Control Condition (WLC)
Age, Continuous53 years55 years60 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
26 Participants38 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 Participants44 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants21 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants23 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Self-reported Fatigue Scores - Change From Baseline Per Scoring Category

Baseline versus follow-up fatigue will be assessed with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) v.4, a 13-item self-report measure yielding total score with demonstrated reliability, validity, sensitivity to change and an identified Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MID). The fatigue subscale consists of 13 items asking about fatigue in the past 7 days. Items are summed to produce a score ranging from 0-52 with lower scores indicating greater fatigue. A difference of 3 points on the fatigue subscale indicates a clinically-important difference.

Time frame: Baseline and at 18 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Self-reported Fatigue Scores - Change From Baseline Per Scoring CategoryFatigue score at baseline28.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.92
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Self-reported Fatigue Scores - Change From Baseline Per Scoring CategoryFatigue score at 18 weeks15.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.69
Wait-List Control Condition (WLC)Self-reported Fatigue Scores - Change From Baseline Per Scoring CategoryFatigue score at baseline24.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.05
Wait-List Control Condition (WLC)Self-reported Fatigue Scores - Change From Baseline Per Scoring CategoryFatigue score at 18 weeks24.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.18
Secondary

Self-reported Quality of Life (QoL) Scores - Change From Baseline Per Scoring Category

Baseline versus follow-up quality of life will be assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General Scale (FACT-G) v.4, a 27-item measure yielding total score and scores for physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being of demonstrated reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. FACT-G consists of 4 subscales: physical well-being (PWB), functional well-being (FWB), emotional well-being (EWB) and social well-being (SWB). Scores on the four subscales are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 108 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and at 18 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Self-reported Quality of Life (QoL) Scores - Change From Baseline Per Scoring CategoryQuality of Life Score at Baseline64.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.05
Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)Self-reported Quality of Life (QoL) Scores - Change From Baseline Per Scoring CategoryQuality of Life Score at 18 weeks84.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.37
Wait-List Control Condition (WLC)Self-reported Quality of Life (QoL) Scores - Change From Baseline Per Scoring CategoryQuality of Life Score at Baseline63.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.44
Wait-List Control Condition (WLC)Self-reported Quality of Life (QoL) Scores - Change From Baseline Per Scoring CategoryQuality of Life Score at 18 weeks68.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.59

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026