Skip to content

OxyGenesys Dissolved Oxygen Dressing; Abdominoplasty at Northwestern University

Prospective, Randomized, Single Center, Controlled Evaluation of the Effectiveness of OxyGenesys Topical Dissolved Oxygen Dressing in Accelerating the Healing of Split Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites Using the NWU Abdominoplasty Scar Model

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02591537
Enrollment
8
Registered
2015-10-29
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2017-10-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wounds

Brief summary

Twelve acute wounds (6 on either side of the umbilicus) will be surgically created in the lower abdominal area. One side of the umbilicus will be randomized to Oxygenesys treatment arm and the other side will be receiving a standard Tegaderm treatment arm. Time to wound healing will be observed over 14 days.

Detailed description

At least 12 study visits will occur over a 3 month timeframe. Twelve acute wounds (6 on either side of the umbilicus) will be surgically created in the lower abdominal area. One side of the umbilicus will be randomized to Oxygenesys treatment arm and the other side will be receiving a standard Tegaderm treatment arm. Time to wound healing will be observed over 14 days (follow up assessments include wound photography, pain scores, wound biopsies, exudate collection, gene expression and proteomic analysis, scar assessment and adverse event collections. Study visits will occur at: Prescreening Visit; Day of wounding; Day 2; Day 7; Day 8-14 (until all wounds have healed); Day 28; Day 42; Abdominoplasty Surgery. An abdominoplasty will occur after day 42.

Interventions

1/2 of the abdominal wounds will be covered with Oxygenesys Dissolved Dressing.

Sponsors

Northwestern University
CollaboratorOTHER
Halyard Health
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Males or non-pregnant females aged 21-85 years. Female subjects of child bearing potential must be using method(s) of contraception acceptable to the Investigator and agree to do so from at least the screening visit until one month after administration of the final study dressing. * Subject is willing to undergo the creation of twelve experimental donor sites 1.0 x 1.0 in size with a depth between 0.0012-0.0018 taken from the abdomen per a modification of the Northwestern Abdominoplasty Scar Model * Subjects who are medically acceptable candidates for abdominoplasty (BMI approximately 25-35 kg/m2) as determined by per-study laboratory assessment and clinical evaluation. * Willingness to provide informed consent and to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who have received treatment with systemic steroids during the 30 days prior to study enrollment. * Subjects who have received immunosuppressive drugs, radiation or chemotherapy during the three months prior to study enrollment. * Subjects with a history of malignancy in the previous three years. * Subjects with uncontrolled diabetes (A1C \> 8%). * Subjects who are current smokers or have any significant pack-year history of smoking (\>1 pack-year). * Subjects with diseases or conditions that could, in the opinion of the Investigator, interfere with the assessment of safety, tolerability or efficacy. * Subjects who have previously had skin grafts harvested from the area to be studied. * Subjects with a skin disorder (other than chronic venous ulcers) that is chronic or currently active and which the Investigator considers will adversely affect the healing of the acute wounds or involves the areas to be examined in this trial. * Subjects with extensive severe striae that would make it difficult to perform a skin graft on the abdomen and/or evaluate the final scar appearance. * Subjects with a history of clinical significant hypersensitivity to any of the surgical dressings to be used in this trial. * Subjects who are taking, or have taken any Investigational drugs within 3 months prior to the screening visit. * Subjects who are participating in other research Investigations. * Subjects requiring treatment with medications(s) that are known to interfere with wound healing. * Subjects who are or who become pregnant up to and including Day 0 or who are lactating. * Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, are not likely to complete the trial for whatever reason, including significant comorbidities that may adversely affect survival or ability to attend follow up visits.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Healing in Days.14 daysWound healing will be defined as 90% re-epithelialization. Mean time to healing will be compared between the OxyGenesys treated sites and the control treated sites.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound Degree of Epithelialization Percent Change by Digital Photography at Each Time Point Post Wounding.Day 14Wound degree of epithelialization percent change by digital photography at day 14.
Pain on Test Versus Control Side Using a Wong-Baker Scale.Day 14Subjects will report pain level on each side of their abdomen at day 14. The Wong-Baker scale is: 0 points = no hurt, 2 = hurts little bit, 4 = hurts little more, 6 = hurts even more, 8 = hurts whole lot, 10 = hurts worst. A grand mean and standard deviation (reported below) were determined by combining participant scores.The identical group mean and standard deviation values reported below are correct.
Scar Quality Analysis; Modified Vancouver Scar Scale (MVS)Day 42Scar quality will be assessed and analyzed between the two groups using the Modified Vancouver Scar Scale at day 42. The MVS assessment is the tool that the Investigator will use to evaluate scar pliability (0 points = normal, 1 = supple, 2 = yielding, 3 = firm, 4 = adherent), height (0 = normal, 1 = 1-2 mm, 2 = 3-4 mm, 3 = 5-6 mm, 4 = \> 6 mm), vascularity (0 = normal, 1 = pink, 2 = red, 3 = purple), and pigmentation (0 = normal, 1 = slight, 2 = moderately, 3 = severely). An average score for each participant was calculated by combining scores from each subscale. Average participant scores in each study group were combined to produce a grand mean and standard deviation for each group (reported below).
Biopsy & Histology of Wounds.Day 28Biopsies will be taken from all wounds at day 28. Analysis of tissue samples will specifically evaluate differences and rates of collagen deposition, angiogenesis and re-epithelialization between the two study arms.
Scar Quality Analysis; ElastometerDay 42Scar quality was to be assessed for each study participant using an elastometer at day 42. An elastometer is used to assess scar elasticity. Unfortunately, the data for this study endpoint were not collected properly, and despite our best efforts, there is no way to resolve this issue. Thus, no data can be reported for this study outcome.
Scar Quality Analysis; ColorimeterDay 42Scar quality was to be assessed for each study participant using a colorimeter at day 42. A colorimeter was to be used to measure the extent of erythema, and melanin content, of the skin. Unfortunately, the data for this study endpoint were not collected properly, and despite our best efforts, there is no way to resolve this issue. Thus, no data can be reported for this study outcome.
Scar Quality Analysis; Visual Analogue ScaleDay 42Scar quality of each study participant was assessed by using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at day 42. The VAS is an 11-point scale that ranges from 0 (normal skin) to 10 (worst possible scar). The values on the scale indicate the observer's global impression of the scar (lower numbers are better than higher numbers).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Each participant was assigned to both study groups (acted as her own control), as four wounds on one side of each participant were treated with OxyGenesys dressing, and four wounds on the opposite side of each participant were treated with the Tegaderm control dressing.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
OxyGenesys Dissolved Oxygen Dressing
OxyGenesys Dissolved Oxygen Dressing will be applied. OxyGenesys Dissolved Oxygen Dressing: 1/2 of the abdominal wounds will be covered with Oxygenesys Dissolved Dressing.
8
OxyGenesys Dissolved Oxygen Dressing
OxyGenesys Dissolved Oxygen Dressing will be applied. OxyGenesys Dissolved Oxygen Dressing: 1/2 of the abdominal wounds will be covered with Oxygenesys Dissolved Dressing.
32
Standard Tegaderm Dressing
Standard Tegaderm Dressing will be applied.
8
Standard Tegaderm Dressing
Standard Tegaderm Dressing will be applied.
32
Total80

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOxyGenesys Dissolved Oxygen DressingTotalStandard Tegaderm Dressing
Age, Continuous41.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
41.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
41.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
16 wounds32 wounds16 wounds
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
16 wounds32 wounds16 wounds
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 wounds0 wounds0 wounds
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 wounds0 wounds0 wounds
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 wounds0 wounds0 wounds
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 wounds16 wounds8 wounds
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 wounds0 wounds0 wounds
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 wounds0 wounds0 wounds
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 wounds0 wounds0 wounds
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 wounds48 wounds24 wounds
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 participants8 participants8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 wounds64 wounds32 wounds
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 wounds0 wounds0 wounds

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 83 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Healing in Days.

Wound healing will be defined as 90% re-epithelialization. Mean time to healing will be compared between the OxyGenesys treated sites and the control treated sites.

Time frame: 14 days

Population: Each participant was assigned to both study groups (acted as her own control), as four wounds on one side of each participant were treated with OxyGenesys dressing, and four wounds on the opposite side of each participant were treated with the Tegaderm control dressing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OxyGenesys Dissolved Oxygen DressingHealing in Days.13.1 daysStandard Deviation 2.8
Standard Tegaderm DressingHealing in Days.12.5 daysStandard Deviation 2.1
Secondary

Biopsy & Histology of Wounds.

Biopsies will be taken from all wounds at day 28. Analysis of tissue samples will specifically evaluate differences and rates of collagen deposition, angiogenesis and re-epithelialization between the two study arms.

Time frame: Day 28

Population: Each participant was assigned to both study groups (acted as her own control). Samples were collected, but not analyzed because the comparative broad healing endpoints did not provide compelling evidence for tissue processing. No data are presented because the Outcome Measure has zero total participants analyzed.

Secondary

Pain on Test Versus Control Side Using a Wong-Baker Scale.

Subjects will report pain level on each side of their abdomen at day 14. The Wong-Baker scale is: 0 points = no hurt, 2 = hurts little bit, 4 = hurts little more, 6 = hurts even more, 8 = hurts whole lot, 10 = hurts worst. A grand mean and standard deviation (reported below) were determined by combining participant scores.The identical group mean and standard deviation values reported below are correct.

Time frame: Day 14

Population: Each participant was assigned to both study groups (acted as her own control), as four wounds on one side of each participant were treated with OxyGenesys dressing, and four wounds on the opposite side of each participant were treated with the Tegaderm control dressing. Five participants did not report their day 14 measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OxyGenesys Dissolved Oxygen DressingPain on Test Versus Control Side Using a Wong-Baker Scale.0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Standard Tegaderm DressingPain on Test Versus Control Side Using a Wong-Baker Scale.0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Secondary

Scar Quality Analysis; Colorimeter

Scar quality was to be assessed for each study participant using a colorimeter at day 42. A colorimeter was to be used to measure the extent of erythema, and melanin content, of the skin. Unfortunately, the data for this study endpoint were not collected properly, and despite our best efforts, there is no way to resolve this issue. Thus, no data can be reported for this study outcome.

Time frame: Day 42

Population: Data were not collected.

Secondary

Scar Quality Analysis; Elastometer

Scar quality was to be assessed for each study participant using an elastometer at day 42. An elastometer is used to assess scar elasticity. Unfortunately, the data for this study endpoint were not collected properly, and despite our best efforts, there is no way to resolve this issue. Thus, no data can be reported for this study outcome.

Time frame: Day 42

Population: Data were not collected.

Secondary

Scar Quality Analysis; Modified Vancouver Scar Scale (MVS)

Scar quality will be assessed and analyzed between the two groups using the Modified Vancouver Scar Scale at day 42. The MVS assessment is the tool that the Investigator will use to evaluate scar pliability (0 points = normal, 1 = supple, 2 = yielding, 3 = firm, 4 = adherent), height (0 = normal, 1 = 1-2 mm, 2 = 3-4 mm, 3 = 5-6 mm, 4 = \> 6 mm), vascularity (0 = normal, 1 = pink, 2 = red, 3 = purple), and pigmentation (0 = normal, 1 = slight, 2 = moderately, 3 = severely). An average score for each participant was calculated by combining scores from each subscale. Average participant scores in each study group were combined to produce a grand mean and standard deviation for each group (reported below).

Time frame: Day 42

Population: Each participant was assigned to both study groups (acted as her own control), as four wounds on one side of each participant were treated with OxyGenesys dressing, and four wounds on the opposite side of each participant were treated with the Tegaderm control dressing. One participant did not report for her day 42 measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OxyGenesys Dissolved Oxygen DressingScar Quality Analysis; Modified Vancouver Scar Scale (MVS)3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Standard Tegaderm DressingScar Quality Analysis; Modified Vancouver Scar Scale (MVS)3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Secondary

Scar Quality Analysis; Visual Analogue Scale

Scar quality of each study participant was assessed by using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at day 42. The VAS is an 11-point scale that ranges from 0 (normal skin) to 10 (worst possible scar). The values on the scale indicate the observer's global impression of the scar (lower numbers are better than higher numbers).

Time frame: Day 42

Population: Each participant was assigned to both study groups (acted as her own control), as four wounds on one side of each participant were treated with OxyGenesys dressing, and four wounds on the opposite side of each participant were treated with the Tegaderm control dressing. One participant did not report for her day 42 measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OxyGenesys Dissolved Oxygen DressingScar Quality Analysis; Visual Analogue Scale5.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Standard Tegaderm DressingScar Quality Analysis; Visual Analogue Scale5.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Wound Degree of Epithelialization Percent Change by Digital Photography at Each Time Point Post Wounding.

Wound degree of epithelialization percent change by digital photography at day 14.

Time frame: Day 14

Population: Each participant was assigned to both study groups (acted as her own control), as four wounds on one side of each participant were treated with OxyGenesys dressing, and four wounds on the opposite side of each participant were treated with the Tegaderm control dressing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OxyGenesys Dissolved Oxygen DressingWound Degree of Epithelialization Percent Change by Digital Photography at Each Time Point Post Wounding.81.4 percentage of epithelializationStandard Deviation 15.7
Standard Tegaderm DressingWound Degree of Epithelialization Percent Change by Digital Photography at Each Time Point Post Wounding.91.3 percentage of epithelializationStandard Deviation 8.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026