Skip to content

Transcorporal Versus Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement

A Randomized Study of Transcorporal Versus Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02591381
Acronym
TC vs ST AUS
Enrollment
3
Registered
2015-10-29
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2017-10-31
Last updated
2018-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Stress Incontinence

Keywords

urinary stress incontinence

Brief summary

The investigators propose a randomized non-blinded comparison of standard vs. transcorporal approach for placement of an artificial urinary sphincter in male patients with stress urinary incontinence after radiation and radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. In the United States, the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), manufactured by American Medical Systems, is the gold standard surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in men. The cuff, which is the portion of the device that encircles and occludes the urethra, is typically placed directly around the urethra (i.e., standard placement). The cuff can erode into the urethra. Transcorporal placement has been introduced as a method to reduce the risk of erosion. Transcorporal placement involves tunneling the cuff through the erectile bodies so as to protect the dorsal aspect of the urethra. This approach has never been compared to standard placement in a randomized fashion. In the randomized trial, no additional procedures beyond the normal care protocol will be required of the patients. The investigators will conduct the study through an established, IRB-approved multi-institutional network of surgeons. Success will be assessed via objective and subjective methods; complications will be tallied in a standardized fashion. Outcomes will be measured at two years.

Detailed description

Procedure/ Methods: Patients will be identified in the urology clinic upon their standard of care visit for AUS placement. The procedures that determine whether a patient is a surgical candidate are as follows: * Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form (IIQ-7) and Urinary Incontinence Symptoms index (ISI) standardized questionnaires * Physical examination * Review of medical history that would preclude surgery * Cystoscopy to evaluate and rule out stricture * Uroflow/Post void residual to ensure adequate bladder capacity Pre surgery work up includes: * Urine analysis and if indicated urine culture and treatment of urinary tract infection * Flow, post-void residual if possible * Cystoscopy to rule out bladder neck contracture or urethral stricture * History and physical examination * Treatment of men with 2 days of chlorhexidine wash to the perineum * Incontinence sexual function questionaires * Aminogllycoside and other abx prior to surgery * 24 hour pad weight Post-surgery follow up: * Routine removal of catheter within 5 days post-op * Treatment of antibiotics post-operatively to be limited to 1 week * Activation of AUS at 4-8 weeks post-op * Incontinence sexual function questionnaires * 24 hour pad weight Routine follow ups will be conducted at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months post-operatively, and yearly thereafter (SOC). Patient characteristics that will be collected include: * etiology of the incontinence. * pre-operative pad usage * prior anti-incontinence procedures * adjuvant therapy for prostate cancer such as radiotherapy, or other history of pelvic radiation * post-operative urodynamic studies * cystoscopy findings

Interventions

PROCEDUREArtificial Urinary Sphincter Placement

The AUS is the gold standard for treatment of severe stress urinary incontinence, particularly in patients following surgical resection of the prostate for prostate cancer. AUSs are small devices that prevent urinary flow via compression of the urethra, thus mimicking the native urinary sphincter.

Sponsors

University of Minnesota
CollaboratorOTHER
Baylor College of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Iowa
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Kansas
CollaboratorOTHER
Central Ohio Urology Group
CollaboratorOTHER
Loyola University Chicago
CollaboratorOTHER
Lahey Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Washington
CollaboratorOTHER
New York University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, San Diego
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Utah
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients undergoing an AUS procedure would potentially be candidates for the study

Exclusion criteria

There are several situations in which either a TC or ST procedure would be specifically indicated, and it would be unethical to randomize these patients to the other procedure. * No men without erectile dysfunction * No use of injectable agents into the corporal body * No prior urethral surgery (Prior surgery defined as; urethroplasty, urethral sling, prior AUS placement or explantation, recto-urethral fistula closure) * No current penile prosthesis * No concomitant placement of penile prosthesis at the time of AUS placement * Males under the age of 18, as well as females, are also excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Revision or removal surgery for AUS cuff problems other than mechanical failure: these include cuff erosion, impending erosion (discretion of surgeon), persistent retention due to small cuff, urethral atrophyThrough study completion, an average of up to 1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of post-operative urinary retentionUp to 2-4 weeksUrinary retention defined as urinary catheter placement for more than 5 days post-op.
Change in 24 hour pad test at 3 months post-op compared to pre-op3 months post op
Erectile function as measured pre and post AUS placement via the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM)3 month post op, 12 month post opSexual health is an important part of an individual's overall physical and emotional well being. This questionnaire is designed to help identify if the patient may be experiencing erectile dysfunction.
Incontinence impact as measured by the Incontinence Symptom Index (ISI)3 month post op, 12 month post opThis brief questionnaire is designed to assess the severity of the patient's urinary incontinence
Quality of Life impact as measured by the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire--Short Form (IIQ)3 month post op, 12 month post opSome people find that accidental urine loss may affect their activities, relationships, and feelings. The questions in this assessment refer to areas in the subjects life that may have been influenced or changed by incontinent symptoms.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026