Skip to content

Comparison of a Cemented, Polished Tapered Stem and an Anatomic Stem for Femoral Neck Fracture

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02591342
Enrollment
1014
Registered
2015-10-29
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2016-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femoral Neck Fracture, Hip Fracture, Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture

Keywords

femoral neck fracture, hip arthroplasty, complication, periprosthetic femoral fracture

Brief summary

Postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture after hip arthroplasty is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Recent cohort studies have demonstrated a high incidence of PPF in elderly patients treated with two commonly used polished, tapered, collarless stems in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to compare the rate and characteristics of PPF in a consecutive cohort of patients treated either the polished tapered CTP stem or the matte anatomic SP2 stem in an elderly population above 80 years of age with femoral neck fracture.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Sundsvall Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
80 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Displaced femoral neck fracture * Treated with a primary hip arthroplasty

Exclusion criteria

* Secondary arthroplasty due to sequel after femoral fracture

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of periprosthetic femoral fracture2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Type of periprosthetic femoral fracture2 years
Type of complications after surgery for periprosthetic femoral fracture2 years
Mortality2 years

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026