Skip to content

Efficiency of Piezocision-assisted Orthodontic Treatment in Adult Patients

Efficiency of Piezocision-assisted Orthodontic Treatment in Adult Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02590835
Enrollment
24
Registered
2015-10-29
Start date
2013-02-28
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2015-10-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth Overcrowding

Keywords

Adult patients, Patient demand for orthodontic treatment

Brief summary

This study was designed as a randomized controlled clinical trial to compare conventional orthodontic treatment (control group) and piezocision-assisted orthodontic treatment (PS group). Twenty-four consecutive adult patients from the Orthodontics Department of Liege University Hospital, Belgium who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled from January to October of 2013.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOrthodontic procedures (for both groups : Control group and Test group)

Damon self-ligating systems (Ormco, Orange, Calif) were used for all patients. The patients were allowed to choose between clear or metal brackets. The bonding method was standardized and applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. After bracket bonding, 0.014-in copper-nickel-titanium Damon arch forms were placed. The subjects were recalled every two weeks, and the archwires were changed only when full bracket engagement was achieved. The sequence of archwires was as follows: 0.018-in, 0.014x0.025-in and 0.018x0.025-in copper nickel-titanium archwires for alignment; and 0.019x0.025-in stainless steel archwires for fine-tuning. Following the alignment steps, impressions were taken, and blinded orthodontic consultants validated appliance removal or provided advice regarding further adjustments. Alginate impressions were taken after the removal of the appliances, and both fixed and removable retainers were placed.

PROCEDUREPiezo-assisted orthodontics (only the Test group)

The piezocisionTM surgery was performed one week after orthodontic appliance placement . The patients received local anesthesia in both arches, and vertical interproximal micro-incisions were created below each interdental papilla. In cases of root proximity (i.e., less than 2 mm of interdental bone), this procedure was not applied. These incisions were kept to a minimum (varying from 5 mm to 8 mm). Next, using a vertical piezoelectric device, 5-mm long and 3-mm deep corticotomies were made, and no subsequent sutures were required needed (figure 1). The patients were advised to take analgesics (paracetamol) only if necessary and to record their daily intakes for one week. Anti-inflammatories were prohibited to avoid interference with the RAP. Careful tooth brushing and the use of a mouthwash (chlorhexidine 0.2% Perio-Aid, Dentaid Benelux, Houten, Netherlands) were recommended for 7 days.

Sponsors

Dr. France LAMBERT
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients (completed growth) * Maxillary and mandibular overcrowding * Patient demand for orthodontic treatment * Adequate dento-oral health * ASA I and ASA II * Compliance with clinic visits every 2 weeks

Exclusion criteria

* A need for tooth extraction * A need for orthodontic temporary anchorage devices * A history of periodontal disease * Smokers * Altered bone metabolism (e.g., due to anti-resorptive drug, steroid or immunosuppressant use) * Mental or motor disabilities * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall treatment time measurement (in days)3 yearsComparaison of the overall treatment time between the test group (piezocision group) and the control group will be performed. It will be evaluated by measuring the time (in days) between the placement and the debond of the orthodontic appliance. The hypothesis is that piezocision accelerate orthodontic tooth movement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Root resorption parameters measurements (intrabuccal radiographic in millimeters)3 yearsA comparaison of orthodontic parameters (root resorption) between the test group and the control group before and after orthodontic treatment will be performed. The root resorption will be measured in intrabuccal radiographic (millimeters) on the day of the placement of this appliance and at the debond.
Comparaison of periodontal parameters between the test group and the control group before (at baseline) and after orthodontic treatment.3 years
Patient-centered outcomes (VAS questionnaire)7 daysSatisfaction post treatment using a VAS questionnaire and analgesic consumption (milligrams of paracetamol) during 7 days after the placement of the orthodontic appliance.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026