Skip to content

In-vivo Efficacy and Safety of Artemether/Lumefantrine Vs Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria and Assessment of Parasite Genetic Factors Associated With Parasite Clearance or Treatment Failure

In-vivo Efficacy and Safety of Artemether/Lumefantrine Vs Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria and Assessment of Parasite Genetic Factors Associated With Parasite Clearance or Treatment Failure

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02590627
Acronym
WB-Malaria
Enrollment
509
Registered
2015-10-29
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2017-12-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malaria

Keywords

Parasite clearance, Treatment failure

Brief summary

Drug efficacy testing is one of the most important tasks that is routinely undertaken by the National Malaria Control Program (NMCP) in Tanzania and has been recommended by the World health Organisation to monitor the efficacy of artemisinin based combination therapy (ACT) and possibly detect evolution/emergency of tolerance/resistance to these drugs. Currently, Artemether-lumefantrine (ALu) is the only ACT recommended by the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare and therefore testing of new ACTs such as dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PQ) is important because alternative drugs are urgently required. Meanwhile, NMCP is revising the guidelines for treatment of malaria in Tanzania and DHA-PQ has been earmarked as an alternative ACT to be used together with ALu. However, efficacy and safety data of DHA-PQ is missing since no studies have been done in Tanzania. Thus, a study is proposed to assess the efficacy and safety of DHA-PQ Vs ALu and provide important data which will enable the NMCP to make informed decisions; and possibly recommend DHA-PQ in the new Malaria treatment guidelines as the second line drug for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in the country.

Detailed description

Currently, Artemether-lumefantrine (ALu) is the only ACT recommended by the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare and therefore testing of new ACTs such as dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PQ) is important because alternative drugs are urgently required. Meanwhile, NMCP is revising the guidelines for treatment of malaria in Tanzania and DHA-PQ has been earmarked as an alternative ACT to be used together with ALu. However, efficacy and safety data of DHA-PQ is missing since no studies have been done in Tanzania. Thus, a study is proposed to assess the efficacy and safety of DHA-PQ Vs ALu and provide important data which will enable the NMCP to make informed decisions; and possibly recommend DHA-PQ in the new Malaria treatment guidelines as the second line drug for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in the country.

Interventions

DRUGArtemether-lumefantrine

Artemether-lumefantrine

DRUGDihydroartemisinin-piperaquine

Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine

Sponsors

Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Tanzania
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
World Health Organization
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged between 6 months - 10 years, without severe malnutrition and with a slide-confirmed mono-infection of P. falciparum, and asexual parasitemia between 250 - 200000 asexual parasites/µl will be included. * Other inclusion criteria will include, absence of dangers signs (see

Exclusion criteria

), axillary temperature \> 37.5oC or a history of fever within the past 24 hours and ability to swallow oral medications. * The ability and willingness to attend scheduled follow-up visits and an informed consent provided by parent or guardian will also be considered as important inclusion criteria without which a patient will not be enrolled into the study. * Patients shall not be excluded on the basis of reported prior treatment with other anti-malarial drugs other than DHA-PQ within the past 24 hours if they have fever (axillary temperature \> 37.50C) and parasitemia. * Patients should have stable residence within the catchment area throughout the study period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
parasitological cure on day 28 for ALu and 42 for DHA-PQ42 daysnon-adjusted and adjusted by PCR to account for new infections.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
parasite clearance after 72 hours.72 hoursMicroscope Blood slide for malaria reading 0 parasite.
parasitological cure on day 1414 daysMicroscope Blood slide for malaria reading 0 parasite.
extended parasitological cure on day 42 for ALu and 63 for DHA-PQ63 daysPCR and Microscope Blood slide for malaria parasitemia reading 0.
reduction in gametocyte carriage at day 14 and day 28 from the day 0 baseline,28 days
occurrence and severity of adverse events and genomic profile of P.falciparum.63 days
improvement in haemoglobin level at day 28 from the day 0 baseline28 days

Countries

Tanzania

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026