Skip to content

A Study of Mirikizumab (LY3074828) in Participants With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Study of LY3074828 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02589665
Enrollment
249
Registered
2015-10-28
Start date
2015-12-09
Completion date
2019-05-07
Last updated
2020-06-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ulcerative Colitis

Keywords

IL-23 antibody

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that treatment with mirikizumab is superior to placebo in providing clinical benefit to participants with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). This study will also investigate how the body processes the drug.

Interventions

DRUGMirikizumab
DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have moderate to severe active UC as defined by a Mayo score of 6 to 12 with an endoscopic subscore ≥2 within 14 days before the first dose of study treatment (note: a partial Mayo score of at least 4 and other eligibility criteria must have been met before endoscopy is performed as a study procedure) * Have evidence of UC extending proximal to the rectum (≥15 centimeters \[cm\] of involved colon) * Up-to-date colorectal cancer surveillance (performed according to local standard), for subjects with family history of colorectal cancer, personal history of increased colorectal cancer risk, age \>50 years, or other known risk factor * Participants must either: be naive to biologic therapy (eg, tumor necrosis factor \[TNF\] antagonists or vedolizumab) and have at least 1 of the following: inadequate response or failure to tolerate current treatment with oral or intravenous corticosteroids or immunomodulators (6-mercaptopurine or azathioprine) or history of corticosteroid dependence (an inability to successfully taper corticosteroids without return of UC) OR have received treatment with 1 or more biologic agents (eg, TNF antagonists or vedolizumab) at doses approved for the treatment of UC with documented history of failure to respond to or tolerate such treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Have been diagnosed with indeterminate colitis, proctitis (distal disease involving the rectum only; less than 15 cm from the anal verge) or Crohn's Disease * Have had surgery for treatment of UC or are likely to require surgery for UC during the study * Have received any of the following for treatment of UC: cyclosporine or thalidomide within 30 days of screening, corticosteroid enemas, corticosteroid suppositories, or topical treatment with 5-aminosalicyclic acid within 30 days of screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Induction Period: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 12Week 12Clinical remission at week 12 is a defined as achieving a 9-pt Mayo subscore for rectal bleeding=0, stool frequency=0 or 1 with ≥ 1 point decrease from baseline, and endoscopy=0 or 1, excluding Physician's Global Assessment (PGA). * Stool Frequency Subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal); * Rectal Bleeding Subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (no blood) to 3 (blood only passed); * Endoscopy Subscore, based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); * Physician's Global Assessment subscore, based on the physician's overall assessment, and scored from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The total score ranges from 0 to 9 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Induction Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 12Week 12Endoscopic remission at week 12 is defined as achieving a Mayo endoscopic score of 0 at Week 12. Endoscopy Subscore is based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); The total score ranges from 0 to 3 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease.
Maintenance Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 52Week 52Endoscopic remission at week 52 is defined as achieving a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 at Week 52. Endoscopy Subscore is based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); The total score ranges from 0 to 3 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease.
Induction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 12The IBDQ is a 32-item subject-completed questionnaire that measures 4 aspects of subjects' lives: symptoms directly related to the primary bowel disturbance, systemic symptoms, emotional function, and social function (Guyatt et al. 1989). Responses are graded on a 7-point. Likert scale in which 7 denotes not a problem at all and 1 denotes a very severe problem. Scores range from 32 to 224; a higher score indicates a better quality of life. LS Mean was calculated using MMRM model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Geographical Region + Prior Biologic Therapy Group (N) + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Induction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Baseline, Week 12SF-36 Health Status Survey is a generic, health-related scale assessing participant's quality of life on 8 domains: physical functioning, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health, role-physical, role-emotional and general health. Domain scores: general health (range: 5-25); physical functioning (range: 10-30); role-physical (range: 4-8); role-emotional (range: 3-15); social functioning (range: 2-10); bodily pain (range: 2-12); vitality (range: 4-20); mental health (range: 5-25). Each raw scale score was converted to a scale score ranging from 0-100 points, with higher values representing a better outcome \[(Raw score) - min{raw score}\] / (max {raw score} - min{raw score}) x 100\]. LS Mean was calculated using Mixed effect Model Repeat Measurement (MMRM) model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Geographical Region + Prior Biologic Therapy Group (N) + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Induction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient's Global Impressions of Severity (PGI-S) ScoreBaseline, Week 12PGI-S is a 1-item subject-rated questionnaire designed to assess the subject's impression of their disease symptoms at baseline (Guy 1976; Yalcin and Bump 2003). Responses are graded on a 7-point scale in which a score of 1 indicates that the subject's symptom(s) are normal, a score of 2 indicates that the subject feels borderline ill, a score of 3 indicates that the subject feels mildly ill, a score of 4 indicates that the subject(s) feel moderately ill, and scores of 5, 6, and 7 indicate that the subject feels markedly ill, severely ill, and extremely ill, respectively. LS Mean was calculated using MMRM model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Geographical Region + Prior Biologic Therapy Group (N) + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).
Induction Period: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 12Week 12Clinical response at week 12 is defined as a decrease in the 9-point Mayo subscores (rectal bleeding, stool frequency and the endoscopic findings) inclusive of \>= 2 points and \>=35% from baseline with either a decrease of rectal bleeding subscore of \>=1 or rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. The Mayo score is a composite score of ulcerative colitis disease activity calculated as the sum of four subscores: * Stool Frequency Subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal); * Rectal Bleeding Subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (no blood) to 3 (blood only passed); * Endoscopy Subscore, based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). The total score ranges from 0 to 9 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCss, Tau) of MirikizumabInduction Period: Day (D) 1, D15 ± 2d, D29 ± 2d, D43 ± 2d, D57 ± 2d, D78-85; Maintenance Period: D85-92,D113± 7d,D141± 7d,D169± 7d,D225 ±7d,D281 ±7d,D337 ±7d,D393± 7d,D448± 7d,D504± 7d,D560± 7d,D616± 7d,D672± 7d,D728± 7d,D784± 7d,D840± 7dPharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCss, tau) of Mirikizumab
Induction Period: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Remission at Week 12Week 12Symptomatic remission is defined as a stool frequency score of 0 or 1 and a rectal bleeding score of 0. * Stool Frequency Subscore is based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). * Rectal Bleeding Subscore is based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (no blood) to 3 (blood only passed). The total score ranges from 0 to 1 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease. The percentage of response is calculated by dividing number of participants in the specified category by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.
Maintenance Period: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Remission at Week 52Week 52Symptomatic remission is defined as a stool frequency score of 0 or 1 and a rectal bleeding score of 0. * Stool Frequency Subscore , based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal); * Rectal Bleeding Subscore , based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (no blood) to 3 (blood only passed); * Endoscopy Subscore , based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); * Physician's Global Assessment subscore, based on the physician's overall assessment, and scored from zero (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The total score ranges from 0 to 1 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease. The percentage of response is calculated by dividing number of participants in the specified category by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.
Induction Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12Week 12Endoscopic Improvement defined as achieving an endoscopic findings subscore of 0 or 1. Endoscopy Subscore is based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). The percentage of response is calculated by dividing number of participants in the specified category by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.
Maintenance Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 52Week 52Endoscopic Improvement defined as achieving an endoscopic findings subscore of 0 or 1. Endoscopy Subscore is based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). The percentage of response is calculated by dividing number of participants in the specified category by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.
Induction Period: Patient's Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) Score at Week 12Week 12PGI-I scale is a subject-rated instrument designed to assess the subject's impression of change in their symptom(s) (Guy 1976; Yalcin and Bump 2003). Responses are graded on a 7-point Likert scale in which a score of 1 indicates that the subject's symptom(s) is very much better, a score of 4 indicates that the subject's symptom(s) has experienced no change, and a score of 7 indicates that the subject's symptom(s) is very much worse.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, France, Georgia, Hungary, Japan, Lithuania, Moldova, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Induction: Placebo IV Q4W
Placebo administered every 4 weeks (Q4W) intravenously (IV).
63
Induction: 50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4W
50 mg mirikizumab administered every 4 weeks (Q4W) intravenously (IV). Participants who do not have a clinical response may choose to participate in the unblinded study extension period.
63
Induction: 200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4W
200 mg mirikizumab administered every 4 weeks (Q4W) intravenously (IV). Participants who do not have a clinical response may choose to participate in the unblinded study extension period.
62
Induction: 600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4W
600 mg mirikizumab administered every 4 weeks (Q4W) intravenously (IV). Participants who do not have a clinical response may choose to participate in the unblinded study extension period.
61
Total249

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009
Induction Extension PeriodAdverse Event0000000040
Induction Extension PeriodLack of Efficacy0000000030
Induction Extension PeriodPhysician Decision0000000010
Induction Extension PeriodReason Not Collected0000000010
Induction Extension PeriodWithdrawal by Subject0000000230
Induction PeriodAdverse Event3022000000
Induction PeriodDid not receive drug0001000000
Induction PeriodProtocol Violation0100000000
Induction PeriodWithdrawal by Subject0101000000
Maintenance Extension PeriodAdverse Event0000000002
Maintenance Extension PeriodLack of Efficacy0000000004
Maintenance Extension PeriodNon-responder0000000001
Maintenance Extension PeriodRolled Over to Study AMAP (NCT03519945)00000000057
Maintenance Extension PeriodWithdrawal by Subject0000000004
Maintenance PeriodAdverse Event0000002000
Maintenance PeriodLack of Efficacy0000210000
Maintenance PeriodLost to Follow-up0000010000
Maintenance PeriodPhysician Decision0000010000
Maintenance PeriodReason Not Collected0000011000
Maintenance PeriodRolled Over to Study AMAP (NCT03519945)000074139000
Maintenance PeriodWithdrawal by Subject0000424000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInduction: 600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WTotalInduction: Placebo IV Q4WInduction: 50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction: 200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4W
Age, Continuous42.44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.371
42.56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.85
42.62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.47
41.83 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.06
43.35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.75
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants7 Participants0 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
54 Participants231 Participants60 Participants58 Participants59 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants11 Participants3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants33 Participants10 Participants5 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants7 Participants1 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
56 Participants209 Participants52 Participants57 Participants44 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
2 Participants7 Participants1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
7 Participants21 Participants4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
3 Participants6 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Georgia
1 Participants14 Participants4 Participants7 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
4 Participants18 Participants5 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
5 Participants31 Participants8 Participants5 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Lithuania
1 Participants9 Participants4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Moldova
7 Participants24 Participants5 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
2 Participants11 Participants1 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
8 Participants49 Participants15 Participants14 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
2 Participants6 Participants2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 Participants50 Participants11 Participants9 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants100 Participants27 Participants25 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
38 Participants149 Participants36 Participants38 Participants37 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 630 / 630 / 620 / 600 / 130 / 470 / 460 / 320 / 960 / 68
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 6314 / 638 / 6214 / 6011 / 1327 / 4730 / 469 / 328 / 9630 / 68
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 630 / 632 / 623 / 602 / 132 / 471 / 461 / 325 / 963 / 68

Outcome results

Primary

Induction Period: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 12

Clinical remission at week 12 is a defined as achieving a 9-pt Mayo subscore for rectal bleeding=0, stool frequency=0 or 1 with ≥ 1 point decrease from baseline, and endoscopy=0 or 1, excluding Physician's Global Assessment (PGA). * Stool Frequency Subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal); * Rectal Bleeding Subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (no blood) to 3 (blood only passed); * Endoscopy Subscore, based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); * Physician's Global Assessment subscore, based on the physician's overall assessment, and scored from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The total score ranges from 0 to 9 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Induction Period: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 124.8 percentage of participants
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 1215.9 percentage of participants
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 1222.6 percentage of participants
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 1211.5 percentage of participants
95% CI: [0.7, 12.27]
95% CI: [1.88, 27.65]
95% CI: [0.92, 14.17]
Secondary

Induction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)

SF-36 Health Status Survey is a generic, health-related scale assessing participant's quality of life on 8 domains: physical functioning, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health, role-physical, role-emotional and general health. Domain scores: general health (range: 5-25); physical functioning (range: 10-30); role-physical (range: 4-8); role-emotional (range: 3-15); social functioning (range: 2-10); bodily pain (range: 2-12); vitality (range: 4-20); mental health (range: 5-25). Each raw scale score was converted to a scale score ranging from 0-100 points, with higher values representing a better outcome \[(Raw score) - min{raw score}\] / (max {raw score} - min{raw score}) x 100\]. LS Mean was calculated using Mixed effect Model Repeat Measurement (MMRM) model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Geographical Region + Prior Biologic Therapy Group (N) + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Induction Period: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline SF-36 value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Role-Emotional3.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.22
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Social Functioning6.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.22
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Vitality3.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.25
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Component Score3.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.22
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Health1.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.18
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)General Health3.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.93
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Component Score3.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Bodily Pain3.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.15
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Functioning2.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Role-Physical4.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.19
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Role-Physical7.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.22
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Social Functioning8.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.26
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Bodily Pain7.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.18
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)General Health3.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.96
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Vitality6.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.28
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Role-Emotional3.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.26
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Health3.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.22
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Component Score6.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.86
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Component Score4.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.26
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Functioning3.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.78
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)General Health4.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.92
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Bodily Pain8.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.14
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Component Score6.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.2
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Role-Emotional5.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.2
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Health6.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.17
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Role-Physical7.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.17
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Functioning4.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Social Functioning9.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.21
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Component Score5.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Vitality7.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.23
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Health7.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.21
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Vitality9.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.28
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Social Functioning11.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.26
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Role-Emotional7.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.25
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Component Score6.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.85
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Mental Component Score8.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.25
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Physical Functioning6.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Role-Physical8.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.22
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Bodily Pain10.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.18
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)General Health5.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.96
Secondary

Induction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score

The IBDQ is a 32-item subject-completed questionnaire that measures 4 aspects of subjects' lives: symptoms directly related to the primary bowel disturbance, systemic symptoms, emotional function, and social function (Guyatt et al. 1989). Responses are graded on a 7-point. Likert scale in which 7 denotes not a problem at all and 1 denotes a very severe problem. Scores range from 32 to 224; a higher score indicates a better quality of life. LS Mean was calculated using MMRM model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Geographical Region + Prior Biologic Therapy Group (N) + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Induction Period: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline IBDQ value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score22.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.41
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score33.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.52
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score42.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.4
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score45.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.54
95% CI: [11, 34.9]
95% CI: [8.7, 32.3]
95% CI: [-1, 22.5]
Secondary

Induction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient's Global Impressions of Severity (PGI-S) Score

PGI-S is a 1-item subject-rated questionnaire designed to assess the subject's impression of their disease symptoms at baseline (Guy 1976; Yalcin and Bump 2003). Responses are graded on a 7-point scale in which a score of 1 indicates that the subject's symptom(s) are normal, a score of 2 indicates that the subject feels borderline ill, a score of 3 indicates that the subject feels mildly ill, a score of 4 indicates that the subject(s) feel moderately ill, and scores of 5, 6, and 7 indicate that the subject feels markedly ill, severely ill, and extremely ill, respectively. LS Mean was calculated using MMRM model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Geographical Region + Prior Biologic Therapy Group (N) + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Induction Period: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline PGI-S value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient's Global Impressions of Severity (PGI-S) Score-0.84 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient's Global Impressions of Severity (PGI-S) Score-1.43 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient's Global Impressions of Severity (PGI-S) Score-1.90 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient's Global Impressions of Severity (PGI-S) Score-1.74 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
95% CI: [-1.39, -0.41]
95% CI: [-1.54, -0.59]
95% CI: [-1.07, -0.11]
Secondary

Induction Period: Patient's Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) Score at Week 12

PGI-I scale is a subject-rated instrument designed to assess the subject's impression of change in their symptom(s) (Guy 1976; Yalcin and Bump 2003). Responses are graded on a 7-point Likert scale in which a score of 1 indicates that the subject's symptom(s) is very much better, a score of 4 indicates that the subject's symptom(s) has experienced no change, and a score of 7 indicates that the subject's symptom(s) is very much worse.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Induction Period: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline PGI-I value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Patient's Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) Score at Week 123.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.46
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Patient's Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) Score at Week 122.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.31
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Patient's Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) Score at Week 122.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Patient's Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) Score at Week 122.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
Secondary

Induction Period: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 12

Clinical response at week 12 is defined as a decrease in the 9-point Mayo subscores (rectal bleeding, stool frequency and the endoscopic findings) inclusive of \>= 2 points and \>=35% from baseline with either a decrease of rectal bleeding subscore of \>=1 or rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. The Mayo score is a composite score of ulcerative colitis disease activity calculated as the sum of four subscores: * Stool Frequency Subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal); * Rectal Bleeding Subscore, based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (no blood) to 3 (blood only passed); * Endoscopy Subscore, based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). The total score ranges from 0 to 9 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Induction Period: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 1220.6 percentage of participants
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 1241.3 percentage of participants
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 1259.7 percentage of participants
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 1249.2 percentage of participants
95% CI: [1.73, 8.98]
95% CI: [2.94, 15.63]
95% CI: [1.23, 6.29]
Secondary

Induction Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12

Endoscopic Improvement defined as achieving an endoscopic findings subscore of 0 or 1. Endoscopy Subscore is based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). The percentage of response is calculated by dividing number of participants in the specified category by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Induction Period: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 126.3 percentage of participants
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 1223.8 percentage of participants
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 1230.6 percentage of participants
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 1213.1 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.21595% CI: [0.63, 8.07]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.37, 25]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.01295% CI: [1.41, 15.14]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Induction Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 12

Endoscopic remission at week 12 is defined as achieving a Mayo endoscopic score of 0 at Week 12. Endoscopy Subscore is based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); The total score ranges from 0 to 3 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Induction Period: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 121.6 percentage of participants
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 123.2 percentage of participants
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 123.2 percentage of participants
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 121.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.986Mantel Haenszel
p-value: 0.553Mantel Haenszel
p-value: 0.56Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Induction Period: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Remission at Week 12

Symptomatic remission is defined as a stool frequency score of 0 or 1 and a rectal bleeding score of 0. * Stool Frequency Subscore is based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). * Rectal Bleeding Subscore is based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (no blood) to 3 (blood only passed). The total score ranges from 0 to 1 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease. The percentage of response is calculated by dividing number of participants in the specified category by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Induction Period: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Remission at Week 1220.6 percentage of participants
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Remission at Week 1236.5 percentage of participants
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Remission at Week 1258.1 percentage of participants
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WInduction Period: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Remission at Week 1245.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [1.57, 8.31]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.81, 15.2]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.05495% CI: [0.98, 5.22]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Maintenance Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 52

Endoscopic Improvement defined as achieving an endoscopic findings subscore of 0 or 1. Endoscopy Subscore is based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). The percentage of response is calculated by dividing number of participants in the specified category by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Maintenance period: All randomized participants in maintenance period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo IV Q4WMaintenance Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 5215.4 Percentage of Participants
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WMaintenance Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 5257.4 Percentage of Participants
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WMaintenance Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 5247.8 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.42895% CI: [0.31, 1.65]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Maintenance Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 52

Endoscopic remission at week 52 is defined as achieving a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 at Week 52. Endoscopy Subscore is based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); The total score ranges from 0 to 3 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Maintenance period: All randomized participants in maintenance period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo IV Q4WMaintenance Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 527.7 percentage of participants
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WMaintenance Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 5214.9 percentage of participants
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WMaintenance Period: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 5228.3 percentage of participants
95% CI: [0.8, 6.55]
Secondary

Maintenance Period: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Remission at Week 52

Symptomatic remission is defined as a stool frequency score of 0 or 1 and a rectal bleeding score of 0. * Stool Frequency Subscore , based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal); * Rectal Bleeding Subscore , based on the participant's diary and scored from 0 (no blood) to 3 (blood only passed); * Endoscopy Subscore , based on colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy and scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); * Physician's Global Assessment subscore, based on the physician's overall assessment, and scored from zero (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The total score ranges from 0 to 1 points, with higher scores representing more severe disease. The percentage of response is calculated by dividing number of participants in the specified category by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Maintenance period: All randomized participants in maintenance period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo IV Q4WMaintenance Period: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Remission at Week 5253.8 Percentage of Participants
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WMaintenance Period: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Remission at Week 5276.6 Percentage of Participants
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WMaintenance Period: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Remission at Week 5265.2 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.13195% CI: [0.19, 1.24]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCss, Tau) of Mirikizumab

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCss, tau) of Mirikizumab

Time frame: Induction Period: Day (D) 1, D15 ± 2d, D29 ± 2d, D43 ± 2d, D57 ± 2d, D78-85; Maintenance Period: D85-92,D113± 7d,D141± 7d,D169± 7d,D225 ±7d,D281 ±7d,D337 ±7d,D393± 7d,D448± 7d,D504± 7d,D560± 7d,D616± 7d,D672± 7d,D728± 7d,D784± 7d,D840± 7d

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of mirikizumab in the induction and maintenance period who had evaluable PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo IV Q4WPharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCss, Tau) of Mirikizumab3330 Microgram*hour/milligram(ug*hr/ml)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42.5
50 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WPharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCss, Tau) of Mirikizumab10100 Microgram*hour/milligram(ug*hr/ml)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35
200 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WPharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCss, Tau) of Mirikizumab24900 Microgram*hour/milligram(ug*hr/ml)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.6
600 mg Mirikizumab IV Q4WPharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCss, Tau) of Mirikizumab3700 Microgram*hour/milligram(ug*hr/ml)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.5
200 mg Mirikizumab SC Q12WPharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCss, Tau) of Mirikizumab1270 Microgram*hour/milligram(ug*hr/ml)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026