Skip to content

L-Menthol Injection as a Novel Technique During Colonoscopy

L-Menthol Injection as a Novel Technique During Colonoscopy: The MINT-C Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02588248
Acronym
MINT-C
Enrollment
82
Registered
2015-10-27
Start date
2017-04-27
Completion date
2017-05-30
Last updated
2022-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colonic Polyps, Colon Cancer

Keywords

Colon Cancer, Colonic Polyps, L-Menthol, C-Mint

Brief summary

The primary objective of this double-blinded, prospective, randomized placebo-controlled study is to evaluate for change in endoscopic adenoma detection rates (ADR) with the use of peppermint oil solution vs placebo application during colonoscopy. The investigators hypothesize that ADR will be increased with the use of the peppermint oil solution and thus further reduce the risk of colon cancer by means of colonoscopy.

Detailed description

Adult subjects who are undergoing colonoscopy for primary colorectal cancer screening or surveillance. The study will be carried out as a prospective, double-blinded, fully-masked randomized controlled trial. Prior to the trial entry, the participant's labs and medical record will be reviewed in the electronic records system. If the subject meets inclusion/exclusion criteria, he or she will be consented at bedside prior undergoing their scheduled procedure and receive standard care as otherwise. Experimental and placebo solution ingredients will be serially numbered and randomized in a 1:1 ratio using a variable block strategy and provided by the institutional investigational pharmacy. Research staff will draw up experimental or placebo solution in 4 syringes with a total of 20mL in each solution. The solutions are identical in appearance and endoscopic delivery. To prevent olfactory detection of the peppermint oil solution an essential oil diffuser will be used in all endoscopy rooms using the same oil as in the experimental solution. Endoscopists will be instructed to deliver the contents of one syringe sprayed via the endoscope in the cecum and one in the sigmoid colon. The contents of the other two syringes are to be delivered at the discretion of the endoscopist. After the procedure, endoscopists and study participants will be surveyed to determine if blinding was effective and to assess patient comfort levels, respectively. The primary and secondary end points will be determined on an intention to treat basis.

Interventions

During the colonoscopy the Endoscopists will be required to deliver intraluminally 1 syringe at the cecum and 1 syringe in the sigmoid colon. Up to 2 additional doses can be delivered at the discretion of the endoscopist up to a maximum of 4 total doses (max total dose = 640 mg of L-Menthol).

OTHERPlacebo

During the colonoscopy the Endoscopists will be required to deliver intraluminally 1 syringe at the cecum and 1 syringe in the sigmoid colon. Up to 2 additional doses can be delivered at the discretion of the endoscopist up to a maximum of 4 total doses (max total dose = 80 ml of Solution B, also has 0 mg of L-Menthol).

Sponsors

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. At least 50 years of age in Caucasians or 45 years of age in African-Americans. 2. Patients undergoing primary screening colonoscopy (either average risk or increased-risk) or surveillance colonoscopy after prior screening/surveillance colonoscopy. 3. Capable of understanding instructions, adhering to study schedules and requirements, and willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. History of colectomy, partial or complete 2. Symptoms suggesting possible colorectal stenosis or cancer 3. Inflammatory bowel disease 4. Familial polyposis syndromes 5. History of, or current diagnosis of colorectal cancer 6. American Society of Anesthesia Physical Stats (ASA PS) score of IV or greater 7. Non-correctable coagulopathy 8. Currently receiving anti-thrombotic therapy, with an INR \> 1.5 9. Poor prep, total BBPS score \< 6, or any part of the colon \< 2. 10. Patients with known allergy to peppermint oil or peppermint containing products. 11. Patients taking calcium channel blockers (Amlodipine, Nifedipine, Verapamil, Diltiazem, Dihydropyridine, Felodipine, etc).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adenoma Detection Rates2 weeksEvaluate for changes in adenoma detection rates with the use of intraluminal peppermint oil application vs sterile water application during colonoscopy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Polyp Detection Rates1 week .Evaluate for changes in Polyp detection rates.
Procedure TimeimmediateEvaluate for changes in total procedure time, cecal intubation time, and withdrawal time with the use of intraluminal peppermint oil application vs sterile water application during colonoscopy.
Advanced Adenoma Detection Rates2 weeksEvaluate for changes in advanced adenoma detection rates with the use of intraluminal peppermint oil application vs placebo during coloscopy. Advanced adenoma will be define as an adenoma with significant villous features (\>25%), size of 1.0 cm or more, high-grade dysplasia, or early invasive cancer.
Cancer Detection Rates2 weeksEvaluate for changes in cancer detection rates with the use of intraluminal peppermint oil application vs placebo during colonoscopy.
Patient Comfort Level Recorded on Post-procedure Survey1 dayEvaluate for changes in reported patient comfort levels with the use of intraluminal peppermint oil application vs placebo during colonoscopy.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Day1 - patients undergoing screening and surveillance colonoscopy are pre-screened to evaluate if they meet inclusion criteria. Once identified patient is approached by study personnel to determine their willingness. If willing to participate will undergo written consent for participation. Patients will be followed up by telephone for adverse reactions at 24-48 hr, one week and one month after colonoscopy.

Pre-assignment details

Patients will be questioned regarding their allergy status specific to peppermint oil and this will be documented in the consent form and in the RedCap database. The patient must meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria and willing to participate in informed consent.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Solution B) Placebo solution Ingredients: 1. 0.4mL of Tween® 80 (i.e. Polysorbate 80) - this is a commonly used food additive that acts as a surfactant to bring the peppermint oil into solution 2. 1L prepackage sterile water 3. 2.6mL of undyed simethicone Instructions to prepare: 4. Add tween and simethicone to sterile water. Then, shake vigorously. 5. Once solution has settled, and patient has been randomized, draw 20mL of solution into a plastic syringe Placebo: During the colonoscopy the Endoscopists will be required to deliver intraluminally 1 syringe at the cecum and 1 syringe in the sigmoid colon. Up to 2 additional doses can be delivered at the discretion of the endoscopist up to a maximum of 4 total doses (max total dose = 80 ml of Solution B ; with 0 mg of L-Methol).
38
Peppermint Oil
Solution A) Peppermint oil solution (1.6% peppermint oil, which is 0.8% L-menthol) Ingredients: 1. 16mL of peppermint oil (provided by the NowFoods® company) 2. 0.4mL of Tween® 80 (i.e. Polysorbate 80) - this is a commonly used food additive that acts as a surfactant to bring the peppermint oil into solution 3. 1L prepackage sterile water 4. 2.6mL of undyed simethicone Peppermint Oil: During the colonoscopy the Endoscopists will be required to deliver intraluminally 1 syringe at the cecum and 1 syringe in the sigmoid colon. Up to 2 additional doses can be delivered at the discretion of the endoscopist up to a maximum of 4 total doses (max total dose = 640mg L-Menthol).
37
Total75

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPeppermint OilTotalPlacebo
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants17 Participants10 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
30 Participants58 Participants28 Participants
Age, Continuous67.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
60.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.77
60.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.75
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
37 Participants75 Participants38 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants46 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants29 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 370 / 38
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 378 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 370 / 38

Outcome results

Primary

Adenoma Detection Rates

Evaluate for changes in adenoma detection rates with the use of intraluminal peppermint oil application vs sterile water application during colonoscopy.

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Peppermint OilAdenoma Detection RatesAdenoma Detected Yes Yes Adenoma Detected19 Participants
Peppermint OilAdenoma Detection RatesAdenoma Detected No18 Participants
PlaceboAdenoma Detection RatesAdenoma Detected Yes Yes Adenoma Detected20 Participants
PlaceboAdenoma Detection RatesAdenoma Detected No18 Participants
Secondary

Advanced Adenoma Detection Rates

Evaluate for changes in advanced adenoma detection rates with the use of intraluminal peppermint oil application vs placebo during coloscopy. Advanced adenoma will be define as an adenoma with significant villous features (\>25%), size of 1.0 cm or more, high-grade dysplasia, or early invasive cancer.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: The data was not entered in the database in a format that would allow it to be collated according to the definition above. Also, some subjects did show more than one advanced adenoma.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Peppermint OilAdvanced Adenoma Detection RatesTubular Adenoma19 participants
Peppermint OilAdvanced Adenoma Detection RatesTubulovillous Adenoma0 participants
Peppermint OilAdvanced Adenoma Detection RatesVillous Adenoma0 participants
Peppermint OilAdvanced Adenoma Detection RatesSerrated Adenoma1 participants
Peppermint OilAdvanced Adenoma Detection RatesCancer1 participants
Peppermint OilAdvanced Adenoma Detection RatesNo Adenoma18 participants
PlaceboAdvanced Adenoma Detection RatesCancer1 participants
PlaceboAdvanced Adenoma Detection RatesTubular Adenoma19 participants
PlaceboAdvanced Adenoma Detection RatesSerrated Adenoma4 participants
PlaceboAdvanced Adenoma Detection RatesTubulovillous Adenoma0 participants
PlaceboAdvanced Adenoma Detection RatesNo Adenoma18 participants
PlaceboAdvanced Adenoma Detection RatesVillous Adenoma0 participants
Secondary

Cancer Detection Rates

Evaluate for changes in cancer detection rates with the use of intraluminal peppermint oil application vs placebo during colonoscopy.

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Peppermint OilCancer Detection RatesCancer detected Yes1 Participants
Peppermint OilCancer Detection RatesCancer detected No36 Participants
PlaceboCancer Detection RatesCancer detected No37 Participants
PlaceboCancer Detection RatesCancer detected Yes1 Participants
Secondary

Patient Comfort Level Recorded on Post-procedure Survey

Evaluate for changes in reported patient comfort levels with the use of intraluminal peppermint oil application vs placebo during colonoscopy.

Time frame: 1 day

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Peppermint OilPatient Comfort Level Recorded on Post-procedure SurveySlight Discomfort15 Participants
Peppermint OilPatient Comfort Level Recorded on Post-procedure SurveySevere0 Participants
Peppermint OilPatient Comfort Level Recorded on Post-procedure SurveyModerate(bothersome)5 Participants
Peppermint OilPatient Comfort Level Recorded on Post-procedure SurveyNot available0 Participants
Peppermint OilPatient Comfort Level Recorded on Post-procedure SurveyNo Discomfort17 Participants
PlaceboPatient Comfort Level Recorded on Post-procedure SurveyNot available3 Participants
PlaceboPatient Comfort Level Recorded on Post-procedure SurveyNo Discomfort19 Participants
PlaceboPatient Comfort Level Recorded on Post-procedure SurveySlight Discomfort15 Participants
PlaceboPatient Comfort Level Recorded on Post-procedure SurveyModerate(bothersome)1 Participants
PlaceboPatient Comfort Level Recorded on Post-procedure SurveySevere0 Participants
Secondary

Polyp Detection Rates

Evaluate for changes in Polyp detection rates.

Time frame: 1 week .

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Peppermint OilPolyp Detection RatesPolyp detected Yes30 Participants
Peppermint OilPolyp Detection RatesPolyp detected No7 Participants
PlaceboPolyp Detection RatesPolyp detected Yes29 Participants
PlaceboPolyp Detection RatesPolyp detected No9 Participants
Secondary

Procedure Time

Evaluate for changes in total procedure time, cecal intubation time, and withdrawal time with the use of intraluminal peppermint oil application vs sterile water application during colonoscopy.

Time frame: immediate

Population: Note that total procedure time was not collected

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Peppermint OilProcedure TimeCecal Intubation time in minutes12.4 minutes
Peppermint OilProcedure TimeWithdraw Time in minutes20.5 minutes
PlaceboProcedure TimeCecal Intubation time in minutes12.9 minutes
PlaceboProcedure TimeWithdraw Time in minutes17.2 minutes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026