Renal Transplantation
Conditions
Keywords
biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, graft survival
Brief summary
This is a retrospective analysis of two different cohorts of patients that has undergone renal transplantation. This is a matched pair analysis of 100 patients treated with generic tacrolimus that will be compared with 100 matched controls treated with Prograf. Data will be obtained from patients' charts, from the Swedish National Kidney Registry and from a local registry at Transplantationscentrum. Patients included in the study are patients receiving a first single kidney transplant from a deceased or a living donor, treated with Prograf or Tacni and transplanted between transplanted January 2012 and August 2014. The 1-year-outcome of patients following renal transplantation, including BPAR, serious adverse effects and graft survival will be analysed.
Interventions
Generic tacrolimus
Prograf, the original tacrolimus
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients receiving a first single kidney transplant from a deceased or a living donor. * Patients treated with Prograf or or generic tacrolimus * Patients transplanted between 1 October 2012 and 1 August 2014
Exclusion criteria
* Multi-organ transplants * Re-transplantations
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) | 1 year |
| Graft loss | 1 year |
| Death | 1 year |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Tacrolimus dose at day of discharge | day of discharge, approx 7 days |
| Compare the following parameters in the two groups • Graft survival at 6 and 12 months • BPAR at 6 and 12 months • Calculated GFR at 12 months | 6 months, and 1 year |
| Tacrolimus levels at day of discharge | day of discharge, approx 7 days |
| Compare serious adverse events at 12 months in the two groups | 1 year |
| Compare the the cost of admissions for rejection treatment in the two groups | 1 year |
Countries
Sweden