Skip to content

Evolocumab Compared to LDL-C Apheresis in Patients Receiving LDL-C Apheresis Prior to Study Enrollment

A Randomized, Actively Controlled, Open-label, Multicenter Study of Efficacy and Safety of Evolocumab Compared With Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Apheresis, Followed by Single-Arm Evolocumab Administration in Subjects Receiving LDL-C Apheresis Prior to Study Enrollment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02585895
Enrollment
39
Registered
2015-10-26
Start date
2015-12-21
Completion date
2017-01-20
Last updated
2022-11-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolemia

Keywords

LDL-C Apheresis, Hypercholesterolemia, Elevated Cholesterol, High Cholesterol, PCSK9 mutations, Severe Familial Hypercholesterolemia, evolocumab, Repatha

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) evolocumab, compared to regularly scheduled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) apheresis, on reducing the need for future apheresis.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALEvolocumab

Administered by subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks

PROCEDURELow-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Apheresis

Participants received apheresis for LDL-C according the their physician's prescription and local custom.

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, ≥ 18 years of age * Subject has been receiving regular apheresis for LDL-C lowering for at least 3 months immediately prior to lipid screening and has a treatment goal of LDL-C \< 100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L), and has been receiving LDL-C apheresis during the last ≥ 4 weeks prior to lipid screening at regular QW or Q2W schedule and with no changes in apheresis type * Subject is receiving lipid-lowering pharmacological background therapy which includes a high-intensity statin dose (moderate-intensity statin dose with attestation that a higher dose is not appropriate for the subject) unless the subject has a history of statin intolerance * Lipid-lowering therapy status (ie, any therapy for lowering lipids, including apheresis type and frequency) must be unchanged for ≥ 4 weeks prior to LDL-C screening * Pre-apheresis LDL-C is ≥ 100 mg/dL (≥ 2.6 mmol/L) and ≤ 190 mg/dL (≤ 4.9 mmol/L) at screening * Fasting triglycerides ≤ 400 mg/dL (4.5 mmol/L) at screening.

Exclusion criteria

* Known homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia * Missing any apheresis session is medically contraindicated or inappropriate * Stopping apheresis would be inappropriate in the opinion of the investigator even if LDL-C is controlled to \< 100 mg/dL with other therapies * Myocardial infarction, unstable angina, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or stroke within 3 months prior to randomization. * Uncontrolled hypertension

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Apheresis Avoidance at the End of Randomized TherapyWeek 5 and week 6Avoidance of apheresis at end of randomized therapy was defined as no apheresis at week 5 and week 6. Aperesis at weeks 5 or 6 was based on LDL-C level at week 4: participants with LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL at week 4 received apheresis at week 5 (participants who received apheresis QW before study entry) or week 6 (participants who received apheresis Q2W prior to study entry). If LDL-C was \< 100 mg/dL at week 4, no apheresis was performed at week 5 or week 6, irrespective of assigned treatment group. Participants who ended the study prior to week 6 were considered as not achieving apheresis avoidance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein CholesterolBaseline and week 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-high-density Lipoprotein-CholesterolBaseline and Week 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol/High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol RatioBaseline and Week 4

Countries

Australia, Czechia, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 15 centers in the following 8 countries: Australia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Participants were enrolled from 21 December 2015 to 21 July 2016.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to continue apheresis on the same schedule as before study entry, or to stop apheresis and receive evolocumab. Randomization was stratified by screening low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (\< 160 mg/dL \[4.1 mmol/L\] vs ≥ 160 mg/dL).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Apheresis
Participants continued apheresis at the same schedule, every week (QW) or every two weeks (Q2W), as prior to study entry, for the first 6 weeks. Starting at week 6 (beginning of the post-primary period), participants received 140 mg evolocumab Q2W up to week 24.
20
Evolocumab
Participants received 140 mg evolocumab every 2 weeks (Q2W) administered by subcutaneous injection for 6 weeks during the primary period of the study. Starting at week 6 (beginning of the post-primary period), participants received 140 mg evolocumab Q2W up to week 24.
19
Total39

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalApheresisEvolocumab
Age, Continuous62.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
59.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
65.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
Age, Customized
< 65 years
21 participants14 participants7 participants
Age, Customized
≥ 65 years
18 participants6 participants12 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
37 Participants20 Participants17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
LDL-C Concentration151.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.3
150.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.6
152.4 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.2
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
38 participants20 participants18 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants7 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants13 Participants10 Participants
Stratification Factor: Screening LDL-C Level
< 160 mg/dL
22 participants11 participants11 participants
Stratification Factor: Screening LDL-C Level
≥ 160 mg/dL
17 participants9 participants8 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 45 / 1610 / 196 / 208 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 42 / 160 / 190 / 202 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Apheresis Avoidance at the End of Randomized Therapy

Avoidance of apheresis at end of randomized therapy was defined as no apheresis at week 5 and week 6. Aperesis at weeks 5 or 6 was based on LDL-C level at week 4: participants with LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL at week 4 received apheresis at week 5 (participants who received apheresis QW before study entry) or week 6 (participants who received apheresis Q2W prior to study entry). If LDL-C was \< 100 mg/dL at week 4, no apheresis was performed at week 5 or week 6, irrespective of assigned treatment group. Participants who ended the study prior to week 6 were considered as not achieving apheresis avoidance.

Time frame: Week 5 and week 6

Population: All randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ApheresisPercentage of Participants With Apheresis Avoidance at the End of Randomized Therapy10.0 percentage of participants
EvolocumabPercentage of Participants With Apheresis Avoidance at the End of Randomized Therapy84.2 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [44.6, 86.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Time frame: Baseline and week 4

Population: Randomized participants with non-missing data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ApheresisPercent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol2.61 percent changeStandard Error 3.97
EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-50.13 percent changeStandard Error 4.03
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-64.18, -41.3]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-high-density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Randomized participants with non-missing data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ApheresisPercent Change From Baseline in Non-high-density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol1.80 percent changeStandard Error 3.29
EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in Non-high-density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol-44.58 percent changeStandard Error 3.34
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-55.85, -36.9]Repeated measures linear effects model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol/High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Randomized participants with non-missing data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ApheresisPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol/High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio0.15 percent changeStandard Error 2.65
EvolocumabPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol/High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio-35.65 percent changeStandard Error 2.67
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-43.39, -28.21]Repeated measures linear effects model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026