Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneously Administered C1 Esterase Inhibitor for the Prevention of Angioedema Attacks in Adolescents and Adults With Hereditary Angioedema

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Two-period, Three-sequence, Partial Crossover Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Administration of 2000 IU of C1 Esterase Inhibitor [Human] Liquid for Injection for the Prevention of Angioedema Attacks in Adolescents and Adults With Hereditary Angioedema

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02584959
Enrollment
75
Registered
2015-10-23
Start date
2015-11-01
Completion date
2017-07-24
Last updated
2021-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous administration of a liquid formulation of C1 esterase inhibitor for the prevention of angioedema attacks in adolescent and adult subjects with hereditary angioedema.

Interventions

DRUGC1 esterase inhibitor [human] liquid

C1 Esterase Inhibitor \[Human\] Liquid administered Subcutaneously as specified on specified days

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo

Sponsors

Shire
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The maximum duration of participation is approximately 9 months. Patients will complete a screening period of up to 21 days. Following screening, eligible patients will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment sequences. Each patient will undergo 2 14-week treatment periods for a total of 28 weeks (Treatment Period 1 and Treatment Period 2). After completing the 2 treatment periods, patients will enter a 1-month follow-up period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time-Normalized Number of Attacks (NNA) for Participants During a Treatment PeriodWeeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2The angioedema attacks were recorded in the electronic patient diary. The investigator completed a separate angioedema eCRF for each attack based on the review of the patients diary. Time-normalized number of angioedema attacks was expressed as the number of attacks per month (ie, 30.4 days) of exposure. NNA=30.4 \* (number of attacks during treatment period) / (days of treatment period).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time-Normalized Number of Attacks (NNA) for Participants During Each Treatment Period Excluding the First 2 Weeks.Weeks 3 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2The angioedema attacks were recorded in the electronic patient diary. The investigator completed a separate angioedema eCRF for each attack based on the review of the patients diary. Time-normalized number of angioedema attacks was expressed as the number of attacks per month (ie, 30.4 days) of exposure. NNA=30.4 \* (number of attacks during treatment period) / (days of treatment period).
Proportion of Participants Meeting at Least a 50% Reduction in NNA (Normalized Number of Angioedema Attacks) During the Experimental Injection Treatment Period Relative to the Placebo Period Excluding the First 2 Weeks of Each Treatment Period.Weeks 3 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2The angioedema attacks were recorded in the electronic patient diary. The investigator completed a separate angioedema eCRF for each attack based on the review of the patients diary. Time-Normalized Number of Attacks was expressed as the number of attacks per month (ie, 30.4 days) of exposure. NNA = 30.4 x (number of attacks during treatment period) / (days of treatment period).
Proportion of Participants Meeting at Least a 50% Reduction in NNA (Normalized Number of Angioedema Attacks) During the Experimental Injection Treatment Period Relative to the Pre-treatment Assessment.Weeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2The angioedema attacks were recorded in the electronic patient diary. The investigator completed a separate angioedema eCRF for each attack based on the review of the patients diary. Time-Normalized Number of Attacks was expressed as the number of attacks per month (ie, 30.4 days) of exposure. NNA = 30.4 x (number of attacks during treatment period) / (days of treatment period).
Cumulative Attack SeverityWeeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2Severity of the angioedema attack sign/symptom was characterized as None: no symptom; Mild: noticeable symptom but easily tolerated by the participant and did not interfere with routine activities; Moderate: symptom interfered with the participant's ability to attend school or participate in family life and social/recreational activities; Severe: symptom significantly limited the participant's ability to attend school or participate in family life and social/recreational activities. Symptom severity score was assigned as Mild = 1, Moderate = 2 and Severe = 3. Cumulative attack severity score was the sum of the maximum symptom severity scores recorded for each angioedema attack in a treatment period. Cumulative attack-severity score normalized per month \[(raw score/number of days of participation in that treatment period)\*30.4\] was reported here. Cumulative attack-severity score normalized per month ranged from 0 to 19.83 and higher scores represent worse symptoms.
Number of Attack-free DaysWeeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2Attack free days were normalized per month.
Number of Angioedema Attacks Requiring Acute TreatmentWeeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2Angioedema attacks were normalized per month.
Response to Icatibant When Administered for an Acute AttackWeeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2The number of Acute Hereditary Angioedema Attacks that required Icatibant as acute therapy is presented by the number of Icatibant injections.
Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Weeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were counted by the treatment most recently taken when the event occurred. Participants were counted once per category per treatment.
Number of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsWeeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2Injection site reactions (Erythema, Swelling, Cutaneous pain, Burning sensation, Itching/Pruritus, Warm sensation) were recorded on a designated eCRF page by the site personnel who monitored the local reaction for 1 hour after IP administration 5 times during each treatment period.
Number of Patients With Positive Anti-C1 INH AntibodiesWeeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2Anti-C1 INH antibodies were measured during study time.
PK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for Functional C1 INH Binding ActivityWithin 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2. In addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.AUC(0-96)=area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to last measurable concentration; AUC(0-t)=area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to the end of the dosing interval tau, where tau is approximately 84 hours (ie, average of every 3 or 4 days) AUC(0-96) = AUC(0-tau).
PK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for C1 INH Antigen ConcentrationsWithin 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2. In addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.AUC(0-96)=area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to last measurable concentration; AUC(0-t)=area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to the end of the dosing interval tau, where tau is approximately 84 hours (ie, average of every 3 or 4 days) AUC(0-96) = AUC(0-tau).
Proportion of Participants Meeting at Least a 50% Reduction in NNA (Normalized Number of Angioedema Attacks) During the Experimental Injection Treatment Period Relative to the Placebo Period.Weeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2The angioedema attacks were recorded in the electronic patient diary. The investigator completed a separate angioedema eCRF for each attack based on the review of the patients diary. Time-Normalized Number of Attacks was expressed as the number of attacks per month (ie, 30.4 days) of exposure. NNA = 30.4 x (number of attacks during treatment period) / (days of treatment period).
PK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treatment Placebo)Within 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2. In addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.AUC(0-96)=area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to last measurable concentration; AUC(0-t)=area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to the end of the dosing interval tau, where tau is approximately 84 hours (ie, average of every 3 or 4 days) AUC(0-96) = AUC(0-tau). Participant wise data was reported for this outcome.
PK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for Functional C1 INH Binding ActivityWithin 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2 and in addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.Cmax=maximum observed plasma concentration and Cmin=minimum observed plasma concentration
PK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for C1 INH Antigen ConcentrationsWithin 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2 and in addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2Cmax=maximum observed plasma concentration and Cmin=minimum observed plasma concentration
PK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treatment C1 INH)Within 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2 and in addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.Cmax=maximum observed plasma concentration and Cmin=minimum observed plasma concentration
PK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treatment Placebo)Within 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2 and in addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.Cmax=maximum observed plasma concentration and Cmin=minimum observed plasma concentration. Participant wise data was reported for this outcome.
PK Parameters: TmaxWithin 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2 and in addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.tmax=time of maximum observed plasma concentration
PK Parameters: Tmax for Complement C4 Concentrations (Placebo Group)Within 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2 and in addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.tmax=time of maximum observed plasma concentration. Participant wise data was reported for this outcome.
Assess Disease Activity as Measured by the Angioedema Activity Score (AAS) Normalized Per MonthWeeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2Disease activity was measured using a 98-day Angioedema Activity Score (AAS). The AAS collects information of disease activity in the last 24 hours. The following items are assessed: experience of swelling, severity of the swelling, timing of the swelling, extent of discomfort due to the swelling, extent that the swelling caused limitations in daily life, and feelings of being disfigured by the swelling. The instrument uses a binary response option for the first item and a three-point response scale for the 5 items thereafter. The daily AAS was the sum of the AAS items per day. Total daily ASS scores range between 0 and 15 points. Higher values stand for higher disease activity. The normalized 98-day AAS per month for a participant is calculated by (the sum of daily AAS within a treatment period/the number of days that a subject has AAS records within the treatment period)\*30.4.
Participant Experience With Self-administration: Overall Experience With the SyringeWeek 14 for treatment period 1 and 2Self-administration survey with questions about the overall experience with the syringe was assessed in week 14 (visit 28 and 28b). Visit 28 summarizes treatment period 1 of the experimental/experimental arm and treatment periods 1 and 2 of the experimental/placebo arm and the placebo/experimental arm. Visit 28b summarizes treatment period 2 of the experimental/experimental arm.
Participant Experience With Self-administration: How Many Visits for Confidence With Self-administrationWeek 14 for treatment period 1 and 2The self-administration survey includes the number of visits needed for participants to be able to self-administer investigational product with confidence and all participants could self-administer without supervision. Visit 28 summarizes treatment period 1 of the experimental/experimental arm and treatment periods 1 and 2 of the experimental/placebo arm and the placebo/experimental arm. Visit 28b summarizes treatment period 2 of the experimental/experimental arm.
Participant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationWeek 14 for treatment period 1 and 2The self-administration survey includes the number of visits needed for participants to be able to self-administer investigational product with confidence and all participants could self-administer without supervision. Visit 28 summarizes treatment period 1 of the experimental/experimental arm and treatment periods 1 and 2 of the experimental/placebo arm and the placebo/experimental arm. Visit 28b summarizes treatment period 2 of the experimental/experimental arm.
Mean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Baseline to week 13 for treatment period 1 and 2The AE-QoL is a questionnaire on the quality of life of patients suffering from recurrent angioedema. It consists of 17 specific questions that are associated with work, physical activity, free time, social relations, and food. Each of the 17 questions has a five-point response scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (Very Often). The AE-QoL consists of 4 dimensions (functioning=4 questions(qns) fatigue/mood=5 qns, fears/shame=6 qns, nutrition=2 qns) and a total score (all 17 questions).All scores were calculated by using the following formula: (Σ items - min Σ items / max Σ items - min Σ items) x 100. Σ items=sum of response by participant, min Σ items=minimum response possible, max Σ items=maximum response possible. Scores range from 0 to 100 , with higher scores indicating greater impairment. Absolute change calculated as visit score at week 13 minus score at baseline per period.
PK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treamtment C1 INH)Within 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2. In addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.AUC(0-96)=area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to last measurable concentration; AUC(0-t)=area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to the end of the dosing interval tau, where tau is approximately 84 hours (ie, average of every 3 or 4 days) AUC(0-96) = AUC(0-tau).

Countries

Canada, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Romania, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a multicenter study conducted at 33 sites/centers in 7 countries: United States, Canada , Germany, Hungary, Israel, Spain, and Romania .

Pre-assignment details

Of the 81 participants screened, 6 subjects failed to meet the randomization criteria and were not randomly assigned to a treatment sequence . All 75 randomly assigned participants received at least 1 dose of the IP.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental/Placebo
Subjects will be randomized to receive C1 Esterase Inhibitor in the 1st Treatment period and then switch to Placebo in the 2nd treatment period.
31
Placebo/Experimental
Subjects will be randomized to receive a placebo treatment in the 1st Treatment period and then switch to receive C1 Esterase Inhibitor in the 2nd treatment period.
29
Experimental/ Experimental
Subjects will be randomized and receive C1 Esterase Inhibitor in both 1st as well as the 2nd treatment period
15
Total75

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Period 1Withdrawn from study340
Period 2Withdrawn from study612

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimental/PlaceboPlacebo/ExperimentalExperimental/ ExperimentalTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
30 Participants25 Participants13 Participants68 Participants
Age, Continuous40.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.16
40.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.34
44.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4
41.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.58
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
30 Participants27 Participants15 Participants72 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants21 Participants8 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants8 Participants7 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 710 / 57
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 7114 / 57
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 713 / 57

Outcome results

Primary

Time-Normalized Number of Attacks (NNA) for Participants During a Treatment Period

The angioedema attacks were recorded in the electronic patient diary. The investigator completed a separate angioedema eCRF for each attack based on the review of the patients diary. Time-normalized number of angioedema attacks was expressed as the number of attacks per month (ie, 30.4 days) of exposure. NNA=30.4 \* (number of attacks during treatment period) / (days of treatment period).

Time frame: Weeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2

Population: Data were not collected for the Experimental/Experimental Arm for this outcome measure and this represents the full analysis set.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Treatment C1 INHTime-Normalized Number of Attacks (NNA) for Participants During a Treatment Period1.611 Number of attacks
Treatment PlaceboTime-Normalized Number of Attacks (NNA) for Participants During a Treatment Period3.931 Number of attacks
Comparison: The LS means, 95% CIs, and p-values were based on a mixed effect linear model with period, sequence ,use of prophylactic therapy with C1 INH at randomization, and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within sequence as a random effect.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.895, -1.744]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Assess Disease Activity as Measured by the Angioedema Activity Score (AAS) Normalized Per Month

Disease activity was measured using a 98-day Angioedema Activity Score (AAS). The AAS collects information of disease activity in the last 24 hours. The following items are assessed: experience of swelling, severity of the swelling, timing of the swelling, extent of discomfort due to the swelling, extent that the swelling caused limitations in daily life, and feelings of being disfigured by the swelling. The instrument uses a binary response option for the first item and a three-point response scale for the 5 items thereafter. The daily AAS was the sum of the AAS items per day. Total daily ASS scores range between 0 and 15 points. Higher values stand for higher disease activity. The normalized 98-day AAS per month for a participant is calculated by (the sum of daily AAS within a treatment period/the number of days that a subject has AAS records within the treatment period)\*30.4.

Time frame: Weeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2

Population: Data were not collected for the Experimental/Experimental Arm for this outcome measure and this represents the full analysis set.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Treatment C1 INHAssess Disease Activity as Measured by the Angioedema Activity Score (AAS) Normalized Per Month25.433 Score on a scale
Treatment PlaceboAssess Disease Activity as Measured by the Angioedema Activity Score (AAS) Normalized Per Month57.168 Score on a scale
Comparison: The Least Square means, 95% confidence intervals and p-values are based on mixed effect linear model with period, sequence, use of prophylactic therapy with C1 INH at randomization and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within sequence as a random effect.p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-42.696, -20.773]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Cumulative Attack Severity

Severity of the angioedema attack sign/symptom was characterized as None: no symptom; Mild: noticeable symptom but easily tolerated by the participant and did not interfere with routine activities; Moderate: symptom interfered with the participant's ability to attend school or participate in family life and social/recreational activities; Severe: symptom significantly limited the participant's ability to attend school or participate in family life and social/recreational activities. Symptom severity score was assigned as Mild = 1, Moderate = 2 and Severe = 3. Cumulative attack severity score was the sum of the maximum symptom severity scores recorded for each angioedema attack in a treatment period. Cumulative attack-severity score normalized per month \[(raw score/number of days of participation in that treatment period)\*30.4\] was reported here. Cumulative attack-severity score normalized per month ranged from 0 to 19.83 and higher scores represent worse symptoms.

Time frame: Weeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2

Population: Data were not collected for the Experimental/Experimental Arm for this outcome measure and this represents the full analysis set.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Treatment C1 INHCumulative Attack Severity3.159 Score on a scale
Treatment PlaceboCumulative Attack Severity8.041 Score on a scale
Comparison: The LS means, 95% CIs, and p-values were based on a mixed effect linear model with period, sequence ,use of prophylactic therapy with C1 INH at randomization, and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within sequence as a random effect.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-6.113, -3.649]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13

The AE-QoL is a questionnaire on the quality of life of patients suffering from recurrent angioedema. It consists of 17 specific questions that are associated with work, physical activity, free time, social relations, and food. Each of the 17 questions has a five-point response scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (Very Often). The AE-QoL consists of 4 dimensions (functioning=4 questions(qns) fatigue/mood=5 qns, fears/shame=6 qns, nutrition=2 qns) and a total score (all 17 questions).All scores were calculated by using the following formula: (Σ items - min Σ items / max Σ items - min Σ items) x 100. Σ items=sum of response by participant, min Σ items=minimum response possible, max Σ items=maximum response possible. Scores range from 0 to 100 , with higher scores indicating greater impairment. Absolute change calculated as visit score at week 13 minus score at baseline per period.

Time frame: Baseline to week 13 for treatment period 1 and 2

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Fear/Shame-12.50 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 21.46
Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Functioning-9.25 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 21.29
Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13AE-QoL Total-10.35 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 17.75
Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Nutrition-11.00 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 22.45
Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Fatigue/Mood-8.40 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 21.94
Treatment PlaceboMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Functioning6.11 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 20.62
Treatment PlaceboMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Fear/Shame5.19 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 12.06
Treatment PlaceboMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13AE-QoL Total4.77 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 12.14
Treatment PlaceboMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Nutrition6.67 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 19.7
Treatment PlaceboMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Fatigue/Mood2.44 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 14.2
Placebo/Experimental Arm - Treatment PlaceboMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Functioning-10.56 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 17.23
Placebo/Experimental Arm - Treatment PlaceboMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Fear/Shame-1.67 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 10.62
Placebo/Experimental Arm - Treatment PlaceboMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Nutrition-9.44 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 25.55
Placebo/Experimental Arm - Treatment PlaceboMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Fatigue/Mood-9.11 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 10.16
Placebo/Experimental Arm - Treatment PlaceboMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13AE-QoL Total-6.86 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 10.72
Placebo/Experimental Arm - Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Fatigue/Mood-10.10 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 13.42
Placebo/Experimental Arm - Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13AE-QoL Total-12.10 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 9.83
Placebo/Experimental Arm - Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Functioning-23.33 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 19.45
Placebo/Experimental Arm - Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Fear/Shame-5.40 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 10.67
Placebo/Experimental Arm - Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Nutrition-14.76 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 17.5
Experimental/Experimental Arm - Period 1 Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Fear/Shame-9.67 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 11.91
Experimental/Experimental Arm - Period 1 Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13AE-QoL Total-11.65 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 9.87
Experimental/Experimental Arm - Period 1 Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Nutrition-8.00 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 16.19
Experimental/Experimental Arm - Period 1 Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Functioning-20.50 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 14.62
Experimental/Experimental Arm - Period 1 Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Fatigue/Mood-8.40 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 12.29
Experimental/Experimental Arm - Period 2 Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13AE-QoL Total-0.52 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 6.58
Experimental/Experimental Arm - Period 2 Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Fear/Shame-1.85 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 11.19
Experimental/Experimental Arm - Period 2 Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Functioning-2.78 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 10.34
Experimental/Experimental Arm - Period 2 Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Nutrition-1.11 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 7.82
Experimental/Experimental Arm - Period 2 Treatment C1 INHMean Change in Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores From Baseline to Week 13Fatigue/Mood3.11 Mean change in AE-QoL scoresStandard Deviation 9.33
Secondary

Number of Angioedema Attacks Requiring Acute Treatment

Angioedema attacks were normalized per month.

Time frame: Weeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2

Population: Data were not collected for the Experimental/Experimental Arm for this outcome measure and this represents the full analysis set.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Angioedema Attacks Requiring Acute Treatment1.454 Number of attacks
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Angioedema Attacks Requiring Acute Treatment3.628 Number of attacks
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.75, -1.599]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Attack-free Days

Attack free days were normalized per month.

Time frame: Weeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2

Population: Data were not collected for the Experimental/Experimental Arm for this outcome measure and this represents the full analysis set.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Attack-free Days26.788 Days
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Attack-free Days21.353 Days
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.981, 6.889]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions

Injection site reactions (Erythema, Swelling, Cutaneous pain, Burning sensation, Itching/Pruritus, Warm sensation) were recorded on a designated eCRF page by the site personnel who monitored the local reaction for 1 hour after IP administration 5 times during each treatment period.

Time frame: Weeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsAny injection site reaction42 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsAny severe injection site reaction2 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsAny mild injection site reaction42 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsAny moderate injection site reaction14 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsAny moderate injection site reaction1 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsAny injection site reaction15 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsAny mild injection site reaction15 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsAny severe injection site reaction0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were counted by the treatment most recently taken when the event occurred. Participants were counted once per category per treatment.

Time frame: Weeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any TEAE42 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious TEAE2 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Severe TEAE4 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE within 24 hours of IP administration10 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious TEAE within 24 hours of IP administration0 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related TEAE within 24 hrs of IP admin.3 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related SAE within 24 hrs of IP admin.0 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE within 24 hrs IP admin. leading to withdrawal1 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Deaths due to TEAE0 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE leading to withdrawal1 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related TEAE5 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related SAE0 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related severe TEAE0 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related TEAE leading to withdrawal1 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Hospitalizations due to TEAE2 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE within 24 hrs IP admin. leading to withdrawal0 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any TEAE32 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related severe TEAE0 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious TEAE3 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Deaths due to TEAE0 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Severe TEAE3 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Hospitalizations due to TEAE3 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE within 24 hours of IP administration7 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related SAE0 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious TEAE within 24 hours of IP administration0 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE leading to withdrawal2 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related TEAE within 24 hrs of IP admin.2 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related TEAE leading to withdrawal0 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related SAE within 24 hrs of IP admin.0 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related TEAE4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Positive Anti-C1 INH Antibodies

Anti-C1 INH antibodies were measured during study time.

Time frame: Weeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Patients With Positive Anti-C1 INH AntibodiesPositive anti-C1 INH antibodies prior treatment0 Participants
Treatment C1 INHNumber of Patients With Positive Anti-C1 INH AntibodiesPositive anti-C1 INH antibodies developed0 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Patients With Positive Anti-C1 INH AntibodiesPositive anti-C1 INH antibodies prior treatment0 Participants
Treatment PlaceboNumber of Patients With Positive Anti-C1 INH AntibodiesPositive anti-C1 INH antibodies developed0 Participants
Secondary

Participant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred Administration

The self-administration survey includes the number of visits needed for participants to be able to self-administer investigational product with confidence and all participants could self-administer without supervision. Visit 28 summarizes treatment period 1 of the experimental/experimental arm and treatment periods 1 and 2 of the experimental/placebo arm and the placebo/experimental arm. Visit 28b summarizes treatment period 2 of the experimental/experimental arm.

Time frame: Week 14 for treatment period 1 and 2

Population: Visit 28b summarizes only treatment period 2 of the Experimental/Experimental arm. Therefore no participants were analyzed in the placebo group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28: SC better long term option57 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28b: SC better long term option12 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28b: IV better long term option0 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28b: SC preferred administration11 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28b: IV preferred administration1 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28b: Preference for admin - very strong11 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28b: Preference for admin - fairly strong0 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28b: Preference for admin - not very strong1 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28: IV better long term option2 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28: SC preferred administration56 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28: IV preferred administration3 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28: Preference for admin - very strong47 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28: Preference for admin - fairly strong12 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28: Preference for admin - not very strong0 Participants
Treatment PlaceboParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28: SC better long term option39 Participants
Treatment PlaceboParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28: Preference for admin - fairly strong6 Participants
Treatment PlaceboParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28: IV better long term option1 Participants
Treatment PlaceboParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28: Preference for admin - very strong33 Participants
Treatment PlaceboParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28: SC preferred administration40 Participants
Treatment PlaceboParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28: Preference for admin - not very strong1 Participants
Treatment PlaceboParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Better Long-term Option and Preferred AdministrationVisit 28: IV preferred administration0 Participants
Secondary

Participant Experience With Self-administration: How Many Visits for Confidence With Self-administration

The self-administration survey includes the number of visits needed for participants to be able to self-administer investigational product with confidence and all participants could self-administer without supervision. Visit 28 summarizes treatment period 1 of the experimental/experimental arm and treatment periods 1 and 2 of the experimental/placebo arm and the placebo/experimental arm. Visit 28b summarizes treatment period 2 of the experimental/experimental arm.

Time frame: Week 14 for treatment period 1 and 2

Population: Visit 28b summarizes only treatment period 2 of the Experimental/Experimental arm. Therefore no participants were analyzed in the placebo group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: How Many Visits for Confidence With Self-administrationVisit 281.8 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 1.7
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: How Many Visits for Confidence With Self-administrationVisit 28b1.8 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 1.22
Treatment PlaceboParticipant Experience With Self-administration: How Many Visits for Confidence With Self-administrationVisit 282.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 2.49
Secondary

Participant Experience With Self-administration: Overall Experience With the Syringe

Self-administration survey with questions about the overall experience with the syringe was assessed in week 14 (visit 28 and 28b). Visit 28 summarizes treatment period 1 of the experimental/experimental arm and treatment periods 1 and 2 of the experimental/placebo arm and the placebo/experimental arm. Visit 28b summarizes treatment period 2 of the experimental/experimental arm.

Time frame: Week 14 for treatment period 1 and 2

Population: Visit 28b summarizes only treatment period 2 of the Experimental/Experimental arm. Therefore no participants were analyzed in the placebo group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Overall Experience With the SyringeVisiti 28b: Difficult to use0 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Overall Experience With the SyringeVisit 28b: Easy to use11 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Overall Experience With the SyringeVisit 28b: Somewhat difficult to use1 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Overall Experience With the SyringeVisit 28: Easy to use48 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Overall Experience With the SyringeVisit 28: Somewhat difficult to use11 Participants
Treatment C1 INHParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Overall Experience With the SyringeVisiti 28: Difficult to use0 Participants
Treatment PlaceboParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Overall Experience With the SyringeVisit 28: Easy to use36 Participants
Treatment PlaceboParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Overall Experience With the SyringeVisiti 28: Difficult to use0 Participants
Treatment PlaceboParticipant Experience With Self-administration: Overall Experience With the SyringeVisit 28: Somewhat difficult to use4 Participants
Secondary

PK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for C1 INH Antigen Concentrations

AUC(0-96)=area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to last measurable concentration; AUC(0-t)=area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to the end of the dosing interval tau, where tau is approximately 84 hours (ie, average of every 3 or 4 days) AUC(0-96) = AUC(0-tau).

Time frame: Within 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2. In addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.

Population: All participants included who have taken at least one dose of investigational product and for whom the primary PK data are considered sufficient and interpretable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for C1 INH Antigen ConcentrationsAUC (0-96)6882 mcg*h/mLStandard Deviation 4586
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for C1 INH Antigen ConcentrationsAUC (0-t)6902 mcg*h/mLStandard Deviation 4574
Treatment PlaceboPK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for C1 INH Antigen ConcentrationsAUC (0-96)1849 mcg*h/mLStandard Deviation 426.36
Treatment PlaceboPK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for C1 INH Antigen ConcentrationsAUC (0-t)1849 mcg*h/mLStandard Deviation 426.09
Secondary

PK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treamtment C1 INH)

AUC(0-96)=area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to last measurable concentration; AUC(0-t)=area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to the end of the dosing interval tau, where tau is approximately 84 hours (ie, average of every 3 or 4 days) AUC(0-96) = AUC(0-tau).

Time frame: Within 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2. In addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.

Population: All participants included who have taken at least one dose of investigational product and for whom the primary PK data are considered sufficient and interpretable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treamtment C1 INH)AUC (0-96)16690 mg*h/LStandard Deviation 803.6
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treamtment C1 INH)AUC (0-t)16780 mg*h/LStandard Deviation 895.63
Secondary

PK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treatment Placebo)

AUC(0-96)=area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to last measurable concentration; AUC(0-t)=area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to the end of the dosing interval tau, where tau is approximately 84 hours (ie, average of every 3 or 4 days) AUC(0-96) = AUC(0-tau). Participant wise data was reported for this outcome.

Time frame: Within 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2. In addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.

Population: All participants included who have taken at least one dose of investigational product and for whom the primary PK data are considered sufficient and interpretable. No summary analysis was done and participant wise data are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treatment Placebo)AUC (0-96) - Participant 18840 mg*h/L
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treatment Placebo)AUC (0-96) - Participant 22150 mg*h/L
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treatment Placebo)AUC (0-t) - Participant 18840 mg*h/L
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treatment Placebo)AUC (0-t) - Participant 22150 mg*h/L
Secondary

PK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for Functional C1 INH Binding Activity

AUC(0-96)=area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to last measurable concentration; AUC(0-t)=area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to the end of the dosing interval tau, where tau is approximately 84 hours (ie, average of every 3 or 4 days) AUC(0-96) = AUC(0-tau).

Time frame: Within 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2. In addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.

Population: All participants included who have taken at least one dose of investigational product and for whom the primary PK data are considered sufficient and interpretable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for Functional C1 INH Binding ActivityAUC (0-96)31070 mU*h/mLStandard Deviation 17396
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for Functional C1 INH Binding ActivityAUC (0-t)31190 mU*h/mLStandard Deviation 17389
Treatment PlaceboPK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for Functional C1 INH Binding ActivityAUC (0-96)13860 mU*h/mLStandard Deviation 7269
Treatment PlaceboPK Parameters: AUC (0-96) and AUC (0-t) for Functional C1 INH Binding ActivityAUC (0-t)13860 mU*h/mLStandard Deviation 7268.3
Secondary

PK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for C1 INH Antigen Concentrations

Cmax=maximum observed plasma concentration and Cmin=minimum observed plasma concentration

Time frame: Within 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2 and in addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2

Population: All participants included who have taken at least one dose of investigational product and for whom the primary PK data are considered sufficient and interpretable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for C1 INH Antigen ConcentrationsCmax77.680 µg/mLStandard Deviation 52.4375
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for C1 INH Antigen ConcentrationsCmin65.562 µg/mLStandard Deviation 45.9331
Treatment PlaceboPK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for C1 INH Antigen ConcentrationsCmax21.257 µg/mLStandard Deviation 5.1647
Treatment PlaceboPK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for C1 INH Antigen ConcentrationsCmin17.913 µg/mLStandard Deviation 4.4316
Secondary

PK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treatment C1 INH)

Cmax=maximum observed plasma concentration and Cmin=minimum observed plasma concentration

Time frame: Within 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2 and in addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.

Population: All participants included who have taken at least one dose of investigational product and for whom the primary PK data are considered sufficient and interpretable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treatment C1 INH)Cmin158 mg/LStandard Deviation 13.04
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treatment C1 INH)Cmax200 mg/LStandard Deviation 30.82
Secondary

PK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treatment Placebo)

Cmax=maximum observed plasma concentration and Cmin=minimum observed plasma concentration. Participant wise data was reported for this outcome.

Time frame: Within 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2 and in addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.

Population: All participants included who have taken at least one dose of investigational product and for whom the primary PK data are considered sufficient and interpretable. No summary analysis was done and participant wise data are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treatment Placebo)Cmin - Participant 182 mg/L
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treatment Placebo)Cmax - Participant 1120 mg/L
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treatment Placebo)Cmax - Participant 227 mg/L
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for Complement C4 Concentrations (Treatment Placebo)Cmin - Participant 218 mg/L
Secondary

PK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for Functional C1 INH Binding Activity

Cmax=maximum observed plasma concentration and Cmin=minimum observed plasma concentration

Time frame: Within 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2 and in addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.

Population: All participants included who have taken at least one dose of investigational product and for whom the primary PK data are considered sufficient and interpretable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for Functional C1 INH Binding ActivityCmax396.20 mU/mLStandard Deviation 273.013
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for Functional C1 INH Binding ActivityCmin258.15 mU/mLStandard Deviation 138.232
Treatment PlaceboPK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for Functional C1 INH Binding ActivityCmax159.50 mU/mLStandard Deviation 82.982
Treatment PlaceboPK Parameters: Cmax and Cmin for Functional C1 INH Binding ActivityCmin125.90 mU/mLStandard Deviation 62.329
Secondary

PK Parameters: Tmax

tmax=time of maximum observed plasma concentration

Time frame: Within 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2 and in addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.

Population: All participants included who have taken at least one dose of investigational product and for whom the primary PK data are considered sufficient and interpretable. For Complement C4 Concentration no summary analysis was done for participants in the placebo group and participant wise data for 2 participants are reported in Outcome measure #19.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: TmaxFunctional C1 INH Binding Activity31.597 hoursStandard Deviation 12.7038
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: TmaxC1 INH Antigen Concentration31.656 hoursStandard Deviation 24.6912
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: TmaxComplement C4 Concentration33.417 hoursStandard Deviation 36.5183
Treatment PlaceboPK Parameters: TmaxFunctional C1 INH Binding Activity55.689 hoursStandard Deviation 49.4851
Treatment PlaceboPK Parameters: TmaxC1 INH Antigen Concentration47.578 hoursStandard Deviation 47.3106
Secondary

PK Parameters: Tmax for Complement C4 Concentrations (Placebo Group)

tmax=time of maximum observed plasma concentration. Participant wise data was reported for this outcome.

Time frame: Within 15 min prior dosing at week 1, week 2, week 8, week 16, week 24, week 27/28 and 48 (± 3) hours after dose in week 27/28 in period 1 and 2 and in addition 24 (±3) hours, 72 (±6) hours and 96 (±6) hours post dose in week 28 for period 2.

Population: All participants included who have taken at least one dose of investigational product and for whom the primary PK data are considered sufficient and interpretable. No summary analysis was done and participant wise data are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: Tmax for Complement C4 Concentrations (Placebo Group)tmax - Participant 194.62 mg/L
Treatment C1 INHPK Parameters: Tmax for Complement C4 Concentrations (Placebo Group)tmax - Participant 248.12 mg/L
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Meeting at Least a 50% Reduction in NNA (Normalized Number of Angioedema Attacks) During the Experimental Injection Treatment Period Relative to the Placebo Period.

The angioedema attacks were recorded in the electronic patient diary. The investigator completed a separate angioedema eCRF for each attack based on the review of the patients diary. Time-Normalized Number of Attacks was expressed as the number of attacks per month (ie, 30.4 days) of exposure. NNA = 30.4 x (number of attacks during treatment period) / (days of treatment period).

Time frame: Weeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2

Population: Analysis done on participants from the crossover sequences (Experimental/Placebo, Placebo/Experimental) who were dosed in both treatment periods. As the measure is implicitly a within subject comparison of the two arms the full analysis set is reported here. Participants with 0 attacks in the placebo period were excluded as %-reduct. not calculated

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment C1 INHProportion of Participants Meeting at Least a 50% Reduction in NNA (Normalized Number of Angioedema Attacks) During the Experimental Injection Treatment Period Relative to the Placebo Period.38 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Meeting at Least a 50% Reduction in NNA (Normalized Number of Angioedema Attacks) During the Experimental Injection Treatment Period Relative to the Placebo Period Excluding the First 2 Weeks of Each Treatment Period.

The angioedema attacks were recorded in the electronic patient diary. The investigator completed a separate angioedema eCRF for each attack based on the review of the patients diary. Time-Normalized Number of Attacks was expressed as the number of attacks per month (ie, 30.4 days) of exposure. NNA = 30.4 x (number of attacks during treatment period) / (days of treatment period).

Time frame: Weeks 3 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2

Population: Analysis done on participants from the crossover sequences (Experimental/Placebo, Placebo/Experimental) who were dosed in both treatment periods. As the measure is implicitly a within subject comparison of the two arms the full analysis set is reported here. Participants with 0 attacks in the placebo period were excluded as %-reduct. not calculated

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment C1 INHProportion of Participants Meeting at Least a 50% Reduction in NNA (Normalized Number of Angioedema Attacks) During the Experimental Injection Treatment Period Relative to the Placebo Period Excluding the First 2 Weeks of Each Treatment Period.36 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Meeting at Least a 50% Reduction in NNA (Normalized Number of Angioedema Attacks) During the Experimental Injection Treatment Period Relative to the Pre-treatment Assessment.

The angioedema attacks were recorded in the electronic patient diary. The investigator completed a separate angioedema eCRF for each attack based on the review of the patients diary. Time-Normalized Number of Attacks was expressed as the number of attacks per month (ie, 30.4 days) of exposure. NNA = 30.4 x (number of attacks during treatment period) / (days of treatment period).

Time frame: Weeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2

Population: Full analysis set from the crossover sequences (Experimental/Placebo arm and Placebo/Experimental arm) was used for analysis of this outcome measure.Participants with zero attacks in the placebo period were excluded because a percent reduction could not be calculated. Analysis was done on participants with pretreatment and post-treatment NNA values

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment C1 INHProportion of Participants Meeting at Least a 50% Reduction in NNA (Normalized Number of Angioedema Attacks) During the Experimental Injection Treatment Period Relative to the Pre-treatment Assessment.41 Participants
Treatment PlaceboProportion of Participants Meeting at Least a 50% Reduction in NNA (Normalized Number of Angioedema Attacks) During the Experimental Injection Treatment Period Relative to the Pre-treatment Assessment.13 Participants
Secondary

Response to Icatibant When Administered for an Acute Attack

The number of Acute Hereditary Angioedema Attacks that required Icatibant as acute therapy is presented by the number of Icatibant injections.

Time frame: Weeks 1 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2

Population: For treatment with C1 INH (Overall treatment with C1 INH group) all participants who received C1 INH in each of the randomized arms (experimental/placebo, placebo/experimental and experimental/experimental) are included.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Treatment C1 INHResponse to Icatibant When Administered for an Acute Attackrequiring 1 injection129 Attacks requiring Icatibant
Treatment C1 INHResponse to Icatibant When Administered for an Acute Attackrequiring 2 injections38 Attacks requiring Icatibant
Treatment C1 INHResponse to Icatibant When Administered for an Acute Attackrequiring 3 injections13 Attacks requiring Icatibant
Treatment C1 INHResponse to Icatibant When Administered for an Acute Attackrequiring >= 4 injections1 Attacks requiring Icatibant
Treatment PlaceboResponse to Icatibant When Administered for an Acute Attackrequiring >= 4 injections28 Attacks requiring Icatibant
Treatment PlaceboResponse to Icatibant When Administered for an Acute Attackrequiring 1 injection306 Attacks requiring Icatibant
Treatment PlaceboResponse to Icatibant When Administered for an Acute Attackrequiring 3 injections30 Attacks requiring Icatibant
Treatment PlaceboResponse to Icatibant When Administered for an Acute Attackrequiring 2 injections89 Attacks requiring Icatibant
Secondary

Time-Normalized Number of Attacks (NNA) for Participants During Each Treatment Period Excluding the First 2 Weeks.

The angioedema attacks were recorded in the electronic patient diary. The investigator completed a separate angioedema eCRF for each attack based on the review of the patients diary. Time-normalized number of angioedema attacks was expressed as the number of attacks per month (ie, 30.4 days) of exposure. NNA=30.4 \* (number of attacks during treatment period) / (days of treatment period).

Time frame: Weeks 3 to 14 for treatment period 1 and 2

Population: Data were not collected for the Experimental/Experimental Arm for this outcome measure and this represents the full analysis set.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Treatment C1 INHTime-Normalized Number of Attacks (NNA) for Participants During Each Treatment Period Excluding the First 2 Weeks.1.524 Number of Attacks
Treatment PlaceboTime-Normalized Number of Attacks (NNA) for Participants During Each Treatment Period Excluding the First 2 Weeks.3.847 Number of Attacks
Comparison: The LS means, 95% CIs, and p-values were based on a mixed effect linear model with period, sequence ,use of prophylactic therapy with C1 INH at randomization, and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within sequence as a random effect.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.969, -1.677]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026