Adenoma, Liver Cell
Conditions
Keywords
Optimized Dosimetry versus standard Dosimetry, Internal Radiation Therapy
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a treatment with Therasphere which is optimized is more efficient compared to a standard treatment for patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinomas.
Detailed description
For patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma, a palliative treatment can be proposed if tumor expansion is limited to the liver. One of palliative treatment is the the Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) with Therasphere®. This treatment is made secure by performing a diagnostic angiogram coupled with a hepatic perfusion scintigraph with which patients at risk of complications are identified and excluded. The treatment objective, with the standard dosimetric approach, is to deliver an absorbed dose of 120 ± 20 Gy to the treated hepatic volume, most often one lobe. Recent retrospective trials show that an optimized dosimetric approach, considering the dose absorbed by the tumor, is technically achievable and would probably make it possible to obtain a better effectiveness. In our experience, treatment personalisation have been described to be used for 60% of the patients with a tumor larger than 7 cm underlying the clinical impact of this new approach.
Interventions
RADIATIONOptimized Internal Radiation Therapy
Injection of yttrium-90 microspheres (TheraSphere®) is performed during the therapeutic angiogram, directly into the hepatic artery (left or right, or even segmental). Optimized dosimetry arm: the activity to be administered is calculated so as to deliver predictive dosimetry: * An absorbed dose to the tumor of at least ≥ 205 Gy and if possible exceeding 250 Gy or even 300 Gy * A dose at the treated healthy liver \< 120 Gy in case of lobar treatment * Dose to the treated healthy liver can exceed 120 Gy in case of segmental treatment and hepatic reserve \> 30% * A pulmonary dose \< 30 Gy for one treatment and \< 50 Gy in cumulative dose in case of multiple treatments.
RADIATIONStandard Internal Radiation Therapy
Injection of yttrium-90 microspheres (TheraSphere®) is performed during the therapeutic angiogram, directly into the hepatic artery (left or right, or even segmental).Standard dosimetry arm: the activity to be administered is calculated so as predictive dosimetry: * An absorbed dose of 120 ± 20 Gy to the treated volume (whatever the tumor absorbed dose) * A pulmonary dose \< 30 Gy for one treatment and \< 50 Gy in cumulative dose in case of multiple treatments.
Sponsors
Center Eugene Marquis
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age ≥ 18, * Written free and informed consent, * Histologically demonstrated Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), not a candidate for surgery or local ablative treatment (radio frequency, etc.) * Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification A, B or C, * At least one lesion ≥ 7 cm, * Hepatic reserve (hepatic parenchyma not treated) after the first SIRT ≥ 30%, * Unilateral involvement, minimal bilateral involvement allowed only with a hepatic reserve ≥ 30% after SIRT * Child A classification only, or B but with bilirubinemia \<35 micromol/L, * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1, * Patients whose biological parameters meet the following criteria: * Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL, * Granulocytes ≥ 1500/mm3, * Platelets ≥ 50,000/mm3, * Bilirubinemia \<35 micromol per liter, * Transaminases ≤ five times the upper limit of normal, * Creatininemia ≤ 1.5 times the normal upper limit, * Expected survival over 12 weeks, * Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing age, * If sorafenib has been taken the diagnostic angiogram must follow it by at least four weeks after its stop.
Exclusion criteria
* HCC operable or accessible to a local ablative treatment (radio frequency), * Hepatectomy history unless a segmental treatment is considered, with a hepatic reserve ≥ 30% after SIRT, * Prior treatment with sorafenib unless stopped at least four weeks earlier, * History of chemo-embolization of the principal lesion, except in case of nodular residual lesion measuring at least 7 cm or in case of progression after initial response, * Bilateral disease requiring a whole liver injection or with a hepatic reserve \< 30% after SIRT * Treatment of another cancer less than one year earlier, * Extra-hepatic metastases other than adenopathies of the hilum smaller than 2 cm, * \>70% tumor invasion of the liver, * Bilirubinemia ≥ 35 µmol/L, * A Severe underlying biliary pathology: * Bile duct anomaly (stent, dilation) Cirrhosis of biliary origin, * Women of childbearing age without contraception * Pregnant or nursing women
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary endpoint is to compare the response rate of the treated lesion at the first radioembolization, evaluated using European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria of yttrium-90 marked glass microspheres SIRT | 3 months after treatment administration |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Progression Free Survival | Up to 12 months | — |
| Overall survival | Up to 30 months after inclusion of the 1st patient | — |
| Related Adverse Events in both arms as assessed by National Cancer Institute criteria (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, (NCI CTCAE) version 4). | Up to 12 months | — |
| Progression free survival not accessible to SIRT | Up to 12 months after treatment administration | — |
| Post-therapeutic dosimetry measured by Positron emission tomography-computed tomography PET / CT | Day one of treatment administration | Dose delivered to the treated liver, the tumors, healthy liver and lings |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed