Macular Degeneration
Conditions
Keywords
Neovascular age-related macular degeneration, nAMD)
Brief summary
This study aims to evaluate the optimal use, efficacy, and safety of a Treat-and-Extend regimen with aflibercept in subjects with nAMD.
Detailed description
The T&E dosing regimen for nAMD has emerged as a preferred regimen for many treating physicians aiming at maximizing outcomes by proactively treating the subject at each visit and by extending the treatment interval (if extension criteria are met), thus limiting visits, monitoring, and injections. To this day, there is limited evidence available addressing the question of what are useful intervals for treating and monitoring, how do they differ among subjects, and how are retreatment criteria applied to achieve long-term desirable outcomes in real-life practice. This study is designed to evaluate the optimal use, efficacy, and safety of the T&E regimen with intravitreal aflibercept in subjects with nAMD.
Interventions
3 monthly doses followed by individualized treatment intervals of between 8 to16 weeks based on protocol-defined anatomical criteria
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Men and women ≥ 50 years of age. * Active primary subfoveal CNV lesions secondary to nAMD, including juxtafoveal lesions that affect the fovea as evidenced by FA in the study eye. Patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy or retinal angiomatous proliferation are eligible to participate in the study, and their condition should be captured in the eCRF. * ETDRS BCVA of 73 to 25 letters (20/40 to 20/320 Snellen equivalent) in the study eye. * The area of CNV must occupy at least 50% of the total lesion.
Exclusion criteria
* Any prior ocular (in the study eye) or systemic treatment or surgery for nAMD, except dietary supplements or vitamins. * Any prior or concomitant therapy with another investigational agent to treat nAMD in the study eye. * Prior treatment with anti-VEGF agents as follows: * Prior treatment with anti-VEGF therapy in the study eye is not allowed * Prior treatment with anti-VEGF therapy in the fellow eye with an investigational agent (not approved, e.g. bevacizumab) within the last 3 months before the first dose in the study. Such treatment will also not be allowed during the study. Prior treatment with an approved anti-VEGF therapy in the fellow eye is allowed. * Prior systemic anti-VEGF therapy, investigational or approved, within the last 3 months before the first dose in the study, and such treatment will not be allowed during the study. * Total lesion size \>12 disc areas (30.5 mm2, including blood, scars and neovascularization) as assessed by FA in the study eye. * Subretinal hemorrhages that are either 50% or more of the total lesion area, or if the blood is under the fovea and is 1 or more disc areas in size in the study eye. (If the blood is under the fovea, then the fovea must be surrounded by 270 degrees by visible CNV). * Scar or fibrosis making up \>50% of the total lesion in the study eye. * Scar, fibrosis, or atrophy involving the center of the fovea in the study eye. * Presence of retinal pigment epithelial tears or rips involving the macula in the study eye.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in BCVA as Measured by the ETDRS Letter Score | From Week 16 to Week 104 | BCVA (best corrected visual acuity) was measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter score of 73 to 25 (= Acuity of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye at 4 meters; a higher score represents better functioning. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52 | from baseline to Week 52, baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52 | BCVA (best corrected visual acuity) was measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter score of 73 to 25 (= Acuity of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye at 4 meters; a higher score represents better functioning. |
| Percentage of Participants Maintaining Vision (<3 Lines Loss) at Week 52 Compared With Baseline | At week 52 | Participants maintained 3 lines (15 letters) vision loss in BCVA (Best-corrected visual acuity) as measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter. |
| Percentage of Participants Gained 3-line at Week 52 and Week 104 Compared With Baseline | At Week 52 and Week 104 | Participants gained 3 lines (15 letters) in BCVA (Best-corrected visual acuity) as measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter. |
| Percentage of Participants Maintaining Vision (<3 Lines Loss) at Week 104 Compared With Baseline | at Week 104 | Participants maintained 3 lines (15 letters) vision loss in BCVA (Best-corrected visual acuity) as measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter. |
| Number of Study Drug Injections From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104 | At Week 52 and Week 104 | — |
| Duration of Last Treatment Interval | Early-Start T&E: from week 16 up to Week 104 or early termination; Late-Start T&E: From end of Year 1 up to Week 104 or early termination | — |
| Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval | at 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks, 14 weeks, and 16 weeks | — |
| Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) | From baseline to Week 52, baseline to Week 104, Week 16 to Week 52, and Week 16 to Week 104 | CRT were evaluated using spectral domain Optical coherence tomograph (OCT). |
Countries
Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This study was conducted from 19-Nov-2015 (First Patient First Visit) to 26-Apr-2019 (Last Patient Last Visit).
Pre-assignment details
A total of 443 participants were screened in this study. Of these, 156 participants were screening failures and did not enter the treatment period. Of the 287 treated participants, 16 were treated during the initiation phase, but were not randomized to a treatment arm after the initiation phase.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Early-start T&E Arm All participants during the initiation phase received Aflibercept (Eylea, BAY86-5321) 3 doses at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 followed by one dose 2Q8 (2 mg administered every 8 weeks) at Week 16. From Week 16 to Week 104 participants randomized to Early-start T&E arm (Treat and Extend arm) received treatment in individualized intervals of between 8 to16 weeks based on anatomical criteria. | 135 |
| Late-start T&E Arm All participants during the initiation phase received Aflibercept (Eylea, BAY86-5321) 3 doses at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 followed by one dose 2Q8 (2 mg administered every 8 weeks) at Week 16. From Week 16 participants randomized to Late-start T&E arm received four 2Q8 injections. In Year 2 starting at Week 48, participants received treatment in individualized intervals of between 8 to16 weeks based on anatomical criteria. | 136 |
| Total | 271 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 4 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Death | 3 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Discontinued during followup | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Other Reasons | 3 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 5 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Late-start T&E Arm | Early-start T&E Arm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 76.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 | 76 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 | 76.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 |
| Baseline BCVA letters scores (study eye) | 61.3 letters STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 | 60.2 letters STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 | 60.8 letters STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 |
| Baseline CRT | 448.3 μm STANDARD_DEVIATION 133.1 | 443.7 μm STANDARD_DEVIATION 120 | 446.0 μm STANDARD_DEVIATION 126.4 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 7 Participants | 3 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 122 Participants | 126 Participants | 248 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 7 Participants | 6 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 8 Participants | 1 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 127 Participants | 131 Participants | 258 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 73 Participants | 81 Participants | 154 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 63 Participants | 54 Participants | 117 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 3 / 135 | 4 / 136 | 0 / 16 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 93 / 135 | 80 / 136 | 10 / 16 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 29 / 135 | 35 / 136 | 3 / 16 |
Outcome results
Change in BCVA as Measured by the ETDRS Letter Score
BCVA (best corrected visual acuity) was measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter score of 73 to 25 (= Acuity of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye at 4 meters; a higher score represents better functioning.
Time frame: From Week 16 to Week 104
Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early-start T&E Arm | Change in BCVA as Measured by the ETDRS Letter Score | -2.1 Letters correctly read | Standard Deviation 11.4 |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Change in BCVA as Measured by the ETDRS Letter Score | -0.4 Letters correctly read | Standard Deviation 8.4 |
Change in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52
BCVA (best corrected visual acuity) was measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter score of 73 to 25 (= Acuity of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye at 4 meters; a higher score represents better functioning.
Time frame: from baseline to Week 52, baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52
Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early-start T&E Arm | Change in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52 | From baseline to Week 52 | 7.8 Letters | Standard Deviation 9.4 |
| Early-start T&E Arm | Change in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52 | From baseline to Week 104 | 4.3 Letters | Standard Deviation 13.4 |
| Early-start T&E Arm | Change in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52 | Week 16 | 66.7 Letters | Standard Deviation 13 |
| Early-start T&E Arm | Change in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52 | From Week 16 to Week 52 | 1.3 Letters | Standard Deviation 6.4 |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Change in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52 | From Week 16 to Week 52 | 2.0 Letters | Standard Deviation 5.3 |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Change in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52 | From baseline to Week 52 | 10.2 Letters | Standard Deviation 9.3 |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Change in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52 | Week 16 | 69.6 Letters | Standard Deviation 11.6 |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Change in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52 | From baseline to Week 104 | 7.9 Letters | Standard Deviation 11.9 |
Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)
CRT were evaluated using spectral domain Optical coherence tomograph (OCT).
Time frame: From baseline to Week 52, baseline to Week 104, Week 16 to Week 52, and Week 16 to Week 104
Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early-start T&E Arm | Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) | From baseline to Week 104 | -161.6 μm | Standard Deviation 135.6 |
| Early-start T&E Arm | Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) | From Week 16 to Week 52 | -28.5 μm | Standard Deviation 56.3 |
| Early-start T&E Arm | Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) | Week 16 | 321.4 μm | Standard Deviation 93.4 |
| Early-start T&E Arm | Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) | From Week 16 to Week 104 | -25.1 μm | Standard Deviation 68.9 |
| Early-start T&E Arm | Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) | From baseline to Week 52 | -164.9 μm | Standard Deviation 117.3 |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) | From Week 16 to Week 104 | -20.2 μm | Standard Deviation 70 |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) | From baseline to Week 52 | -167.1 μm | Standard Deviation 117.1 |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) | From baseline to Week 104 | -158.6 μm | Standard Deviation 125.1 |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) | Week 16 | 322.5 μm | Standard Deviation 104 |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) | From Week 16 to Week 52 | -28.7 μm | Standard Deviation 54 |
Duration of Last Treatment Interval
Time frame: Early-Start T&E: from week 16 up to Week 104 or early termination; Late-Start T&E: From end of Year 1 up to Week 104 or early termination
Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early-start T&E Arm | Duration of Last Treatment Interval | 11.5 Weeks | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Duration of Last Treatment Interval | 11.4 Weeks | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
Number of Study Drug Injections From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104
Time frame: At Week 52 and Week 104
Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early-start T&E Arm | Number of Study Drug Injections From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104 | Week 52 | 7.1 injections | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Early-start T&E Arm | Number of Study Drug Injections From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104 | Week 104 | 12.0 injections | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Number of Study Drug Injections From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104 | Week 52 | 8.0 injections | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Number of Study Drug Injections From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104 | Week 104 | 13.0 injections | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
Percentage of Participants Gained 3-line at Week 52 and Week 104 Compared With Baseline
Participants gained 3 lines (15 letters) in BCVA (Best-corrected visual acuity) as measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter.
Time frame: At Week 52 and Week 104
Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Gained 3-line at Week 52 and Week 104 Compared With Baseline | Week 52 | 19.8 Percentage |
| Early-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Gained 3-line at Week 52 and Week 104 Compared With Baseline | Week 104 | 18.9 Percentage |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Gained 3-line at Week 52 and Week 104 Compared With Baseline | Week 52 | 27.9 Percentage |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Gained 3-line at Week 52 and Week 104 Compared With Baseline | Week 104 | 22.1 Percentage |
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Vision (<3 Lines Loss) at Week 104 Compared With Baseline
Participants maintained 3 lines (15 letters) vision loss in BCVA (Best-corrected visual acuity) as measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter.
Time frame: at Week 104
Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Early-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Maintaining Vision (<3 Lines Loss) at Week 104 Compared With Baseline | 93.4 Percentage |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Maintaining Vision (<3 Lines Loss) at Week 104 Compared With Baseline | 96.2 Percentage |
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Vision (<3 Lines Loss) at Week 52 Compared With Baseline
Participants maintained 3 lines (15 letters) vision loss in BCVA (Best-corrected visual acuity) as measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter.
Time frame: At week 52
Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Early-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Maintaining Vision (<3 Lines Loss) at Week 52 Compared With Baseline | 100.0 Percentage |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Maintaining Vision (<3 Lines Loss) at Week 52 Compared With Baseline | 100.0 Percentage |
Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval
Time frame: at 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks, 14 weeks, and 16 weeks
Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval | >16 weeks | 4.7 percentage |
| Early-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval | <8 weeks | 5.7 percentage |
| Early-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval | 8 weeks | 27.4 percentage |
| Early-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval | 10 weeks | 19.8 percentage |
| Early-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval | 12 weeks | 8.5 percentage |
| Early-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval | 14 weeks | 8.5 percentage |
| Early-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval | 16 weeks | 25.5 percentage |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval | >16 weeks | 1.9 percentage |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval | 12 weeks | 13.5 percentage |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval | <8 weeks | 7.7 percentage |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval | 16 weeks | 25.0 percentage |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval | 8 weeks | 29.8 percentage |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval | 14 weeks | 11.5 percentage |
| Late-start T&E Arm | Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval | 10 weeks | 10.6 percentage |