Skip to content

Managing Neovascular (Known as Wet) Age-related Macular Degeneration Over 2 Years Using Different Treatment Schedules of 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injected in the Eye

Managing Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (nAMD) Over 2 Years With a Treat and Extend (T&E) Regimen of 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept - a Randomized, Open-label, Active-controlled, Parallel-group Phase IV/IIIb Study (ARIES)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02581891
Acronym
ARIES
Enrollment
287
Registered
2015-10-21
Start date
2015-11-19
Completion date
2019-04-26
Last updated
2023-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Macular Degeneration

Keywords

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration, nAMD)

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the optimal use, efficacy, and safety of a Treat-and-Extend regimen with aflibercept in subjects with nAMD.

Detailed description

The T&E dosing regimen for nAMD has emerged as a preferred regimen for many treating physicians aiming at maximizing outcomes by proactively treating the subject at each visit and by extending the treatment interval (if extension criteria are met), thus limiting visits, monitoring, and injections. To this day, there is limited evidence available addressing the question of what are useful intervals for treating and monitoring, how do they differ among subjects, and how are retreatment criteria applied to achieve long-term desirable outcomes in real-life practice. This study is designed to evaluate the optimal use, efficacy, and safety of the T&E regimen with intravitreal aflibercept in subjects with nAMD.

Interventions

DRUGEylea (Intravitreal Aflibercept, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321)

3 monthly doses followed by individualized treatment intervals of between 8 to16 weeks based on protocol-defined anatomical criteria

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women ≥ 50 years of age. * Active primary subfoveal CNV lesions secondary to nAMD, including juxtafoveal lesions that affect the fovea as evidenced by FA in the study eye. Patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy or retinal angiomatous proliferation are eligible to participate in the study, and their condition should be captured in the eCRF. * ETDRS BCVA of 73 to 25 letters (20/40 to 20/320 Snellen equivalent) in the study eye. * The area of CNV must occupy at least 50% of the total lesion.

Exclusion criteria

* Any prior ocular (in the study eye) or systemic treatment or surgery for nAMD, except dietary supplements or vitamins. * Any prior or concomitant therapy with another investigational agent to treat nAMD in the study eye. * Prior treatment with anti-VEGF agents as follows: * Prior treatment with anti-VEGF therapy in the study eye is not allowed * Prior treatment with anti-VEGF therapy in the fellow eye with an investigational agent (not approved, e.g. bevacizumab) within the last 3 months before the first dose in the study. Such treatment will also not be allowed during the study. Prior treatment with an approved anti-VEGF therapy in the fellow eye is allowed. * Prior systemic anti-VEGF therapy, investigational or approved, within the last 3 months before the first dose in the study, and such treatment will not be allowed during the study. * Total lesion size \>12 disc areas (30.5 mm2, including blood, scars and neovascularization) as assessed by FA in the study eye. * Subretinal hemorrhages that are either 50% or more of the total lesion area, or if the blood is under the fovea and is 1 or more disc areas in size in the study eye. (If the blood is under the fovea, then the fovea must be surrounded by 270 degrees by visible CNV). * Scar or fibrosis making up \>50% of the total lesion in the study eye. * Scar, fibrosis, or atrophy involving the center of the fovea in the study eye. * Presence of retinal pigment epithelial tears or rips involving the macula in the study eye.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in BCVA as Measured by the ETDRS Letter ScoreFrom Week 16 to Week 104BCVA (best corrected visual acuity) was measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter score of 73 to 25 (= Acuity of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye at 4 meters; a higher score represents better functioning.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52from baseline to Week 52, baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52BCVA (best corrected visual acuity) was measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter score of 73 to 25 (= Acuity of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye at 4 meters; a higher score represents better functioning.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Vision (<3 Lines Loss) at Week 52 Compared With BaselineAt week 52Participants maintained 3 lines (15 letters) vision loss in BCVA (Best-corrected visual acuity) as measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter.
Percentage of Participants Gained 3-line at Week 52 and Week 104 Compared With BaselineAt Week 52 and Week 104Participants gained 3 lines (15 letters) in BCVA (Best-corrected visual acuity) as measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Vision (<3 Lines Loss) at Week 104 Compared With Baselineat Week 104Participants maintained 3 lines (15 letters) vision loss in BCVA (Best-corrected visual acuity) as measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter.
Number of Study Drug Injections From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104At Week 52 and Week 104
Duration of Last Treatment IntervalEarly-Start T&E: from week 16 up to Week 104 or early termination; Late-Start T&E: From end of Year 1 up to Week 104 or early termination
Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Intervalat 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks, 14 weeks, and 16 weeks
Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)From baseline to Week 52, baseline to Week 104, Week 16 to Week 52, and Week 16 to Week 104CRT were evaluated using spectral domain Optical coherence tomograph (OCT).

Countries

Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted from 19-Nov-2015 (First Patient First Visit) to 26-Apr-2019 (Last Patient Last Visit).

Pre-assignment details

A total of 443 participants were screened in this study. Of these, 156 participants were screening failures and did not enter the treatment period. Of the 287 treated participants, 16 were treated during the initiation phase, but were not randomized to a treatment arm after the initiation phase.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Early-start T&E Arm
All participants during the initiation phase received Aflibercept (Eylea, BAY86-5321) 3 doses at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 followed by one dose 2Q8 (2 mg administered every 8 weeks) at Week 16. From Week 16 to Week 104 participants randomized to Early-start T&E arm (Treat and Extend arm) received treatment in individualized intervals of between 8 to16 weeks based on anatomical criteria.
135
Late-start T&E Arm
All participants during the initiation phase received Aflibercept (Eylea, BAY86-5321) 3 doses at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 followed by one dose 2Q8 (2 mg administered every 8 weeks) at Week 16. From Week 16 participants randomized to Late-start T&E arm received four 2Q8 injections. In Year 2 starting at Week 48, participants received treatment in individualized intervals of between 8 to16 weeks based on anatomical criteria.
136
Total271

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event46
Overall StudyDeath34
Overall StudyDiscontinued during followup10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyOther Reasons31
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject45

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLate-start T&E ArmEarly-start T&E ArmTotal
Age, Continuous76.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
76 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
76.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
Baseline BCVA letters scores (study eye)61.3 letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
60.2 letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
60.8 letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Baseline CRT448.3 μm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 133.1
443.7 μm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 120
446.0 μm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 126.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
122 Participants126 Participants248 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants1 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
127 Participants131 Participants258 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
73 Participants81 Participants154 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
63 Participants54 Participants117 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 1354 / 1360 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
93 / 13580 / 13610 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
29 / 13535 / 1363 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Change in BCVA as Measured by the ETDRS Letter Score

BCVA (best corrected visual acuity) was measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter score of 73 to 25 (= Acuity of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye at 4 meters; a higher score represents better functioning.

Time frame: From Week 16 to Week 104

Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early-start T&E ArmChange in BCVA as Measured by the ETDRS Letter Score-2.1 Letters correctly readStandard Deviation 11.4
Late-start T&E ArmChange in BCVA as Measured by the ETDRS Letter Score-0.4 Letters correctly readStandard Deviation 8.4
p-value: 0.016295% CI: [-4.747, 0.7073]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52

BCVA (best corrected visual acuity) was measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter score of 73 to 25 (= Acuity of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye at 4 meters; a higher score represents better functioning.

Time frame: from baseline to Week 52, baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52

Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early-start T&E ArmChange in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52From baseline to Week 527.8 LettersStandard Deviation 9.4
Early-start T&E ArmChange in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52From baseline to Week 1044.3 LettersStandard Deviation 13.4
Early-start T&E ArmChange in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52Week 1666.7 LettersStandard Deviation 13
Early-start T&E ArmChange in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52From Week 16 to Week 521.3 LettersStandard Deviation 6.4
Late-start T&E ArmChange in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52From Week 16 to Week 522.0 LettersStandard Deviation 5.3
Late-start T&E ArmChange in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52From baseline to Week 5210.2 LettersStandard Deviation 9.3
Late-start T&E ArmChange in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52Week 1669.6 LettersStandard Deviation 11.6
Late-start T&E ArmChange in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52, Baseline to Week 104, and Week 16 to Week 52From baseline to Week 1047.9 LettersStandard Deviation 11.9
Secondary

Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)

CRT were evaluated using spectral domain Optical coherence tomograph (OCT).

Time frame: From baseline to Week 52, baseline to Week 104, Week 16 to Week 52, and Week 16 to Week 104

Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early-start T&E ArmChange in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)From baseline to Week 104-161.6 μmStandard Deviation 135.6
Early-start T&E ArmChange in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)From Week 16 to Week 52-28.5 μmStandard Deviation 56.3
Early-start T&E ArmChange in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)Week 16321.4 μmStandard Deviation 93.4
Early-start T&E ArmChange in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)From Week 16 to Week 104-25.1 μmStandard Deviation 68.9
Early-start T&E ArmChange in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)From baseline to Week 52-164.9 μmStandard Deviation 117.3
Late-start T&E ArmChange in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)From Week 16 to Week 104-20.2 μmStandard Deviation 70
Late-start T&E ArmChange in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)From baseline to Week 52-167.1 μmStandard Deviation 117.1
Late-start T&E ArmChange in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)From baseline to Week 104-158.6 μmStandard Deviation 125.1
Late-start T&E ArmChange in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)Week 16322.5 μmStandard Deviation 104
Late-start T&E ArmChange in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)From Week 16 to Week 52-28.7 μmStandard Deviation 54
Secondary

Duration of Last Treatment Interval

Time frame: Early-Start T&E: from week 16 up to Week 104 or early termination; Late-Start T&E: From end of Year 1 up to Week 104 or early termination

Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early-start T&E ArmDuration of Last Treatment Interval11.5 WeeksStandard Deviation 3.7
Late-start T&E ArmDuration of Last Treatment Interval11.4 WeeksStandard Deviation 3.7
Secondary

Number of Study Drug Injections From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104

Time frame: At Week 52 and Week 104

Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early-start T&E ArmNumber of Study Drug Injections From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104Week 527.1 injectionsStandard Deviation 0.8
Early-start T&E ArmNumber of Study Drug Injections From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104Week 10412.0 injectionsStandard Deviation 2.3
Late-start T&E ArmNumber of Study Drug Injections From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104Week 528.0 injectionsStandard Deviation 0.2
Late-start T&E ArmNumber of Study Drug Injections From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104Week 10413.0 injectionsStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gained 3-line at Week 52 and Week 104 Compared With Baseline

Participants gained 3 lines (15 letters) in BCVA (Best-corrected visual acuity) as measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter.

Time frame: At Week 52 and Week 104

Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Early-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Gained 3-line at Week 52 and Week 104 Compared With BaselineWeek 5219.8 Percentage
Early-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Gained 3-line at Week 52 and Week 104 Compared With BaselineWeek 10418.9 Percentage
Late-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Gained 3-line at Week 52 and Week 104 Compared With BaselineWeek 5227.9 Percentage
Late-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Gained 3-line at Week 52 and Week 104 Compared With BaselineWeek 10422.1 Percentage
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Maintaining Vision (<3 Lines Loss) at Week 104 Compared With Baseline

Participants maintained 3 lines (15 letters) vision loss in BCVA (Best-corrected visual acuity) as measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter.

Time frame: at Week 104

Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Early-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Maintaining Vision (<3 Lines Loss) at Week 104 Compared With Baseline93.4 Percentage
Late-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Maintaining Vision (<3 Lines Loss) at Week 104 Compared With Baseline96.2 Percentage
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Maintaining Vision (<3 Lines Loss) at Week 52 Compared With Baseline

Participants maintained 3 lines (15 letters) vision loss in BCVA (Best-corrected visual acuity) as measured by the ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) letter.

Time frame: At week 52

Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Early-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Maintaining Vision (<3 Lines Loss) at Week 52 Compared With Baseline100.0 Percentage
Late-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Maintaining Vision (<3 Lines Loss) at Week 52 Compared With Baseline100.0 Percentage
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval

Time frame: at 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks, 14 weeks, and 16 weeks

Population: PPS (Per-protocol set): all participants in the FAS (full analysis set) without any major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Early-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval>16 weeks4.7 percentage
Early-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval<8 weeks5.7 percentage
Early-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval8 weeks27.4 percentage
Early-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval10 weeks19.8 percentage
Early-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval12 weeks8.5 percentage
Early-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval14 weeks8.5 percentage
Early-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval16 weeks25.5 percentage
Late-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval>16 weeks1.9 percentage
Late-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval12 weeks13.5 percentage
Late-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval<8 weeks7.7 percentage
Late-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval16 weeks25.0 percentage
Late-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval8 weeks29.8 percentage
Late-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval14 weeks11.5 percentage
Late-start T&E ArmPercentage of Participants Requiring Retreatment at 8 Weeks, 10 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 14 Weeks, and 16 Weeks as the Last Treatment Interval10 weeks10.6 percentage

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026