Facet Joint Syndrome
Conditions
Keywords
Radiofrequency ablation, RF-MB, Lumbar RF, Facet joint syndrome, Multifidus twitching, Sensory stimulation
Brief summary
The investigators collected data and chart from the patients who were diagnosed facet joint syndrome and underwent lumbar RF medial branch neurotomy between January 2009 and June 2014. RF was performed using sensory stimulation and multifidus twitching to confirm the position of RF needle. The patients wil be grouped according to the adequacy of RF needle position while performing RF medial branch neurotomy ('complete' when all needles were placed adequately, 'partial' when one of the needles for a facet joint medial branch was placed inadequately, 'none' when there were both needles positioned inadequately for a facet joint) The relationship between the long term effect of RF neurotomy (longer than 6 months) and the groups will be analyzed.
Detailed description
Facet joint syndrome has been described as a common cause of lumbar back pain. To achieve prolonged therapeutic effect in patients with lumbar facet joint syndrome, radiofrequency (RF) medial branch neurotomy is commonly performed. When performing RF neurotomy, needle placement in correct position is very important. For this reason, identification of sensory stimulation and multifidus muscle twitching by using the electrode have been commonly performed. However, there were no previous reports regarding relationship between prognosis of RF neurotomy and multifidus muscle twitching in combination of sensory stimulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of multifidus twitching when sensory stimulation was achieved while performing RF needle neurotomy in patients with lumbar facet syndrome. The investigators have collected data and chart from the patients who were diagnosed facet joint syndrome and underwent lumbar RF medial branch neurotomy between January 2009 and June 2014. RF was performed using sensory stimulation and multifidus twitching to confirm the position of RF needle. When numeric pain intensity score decreased less than half of the initial pain score, the procedure was regarded as effective and the duration was followed and recorded for each patients. When multifidus twitching was observed in a voltage less than 1.0 to 2.0 times of the sensory stimulation (≤ 0.5V), the positioning of the RF needle will be regarded as adequate. The most appropriate cutoff value will be determined by univariate analysis. The patients will be grouped according to the adequacy of RF needle position while performing RF medial branch neurotomy ('complete' when all needles were placed adequately, 'partial' when one of the needles for a facet joint medial branch was placed inadequately, 'none' when there were both needles positioned inadequately for a facet joint) The relationship between the long term effect of RF neurotomy (longer than 6 months) and the groups will be analyzed.
Interventions
PROCEDURERadiofrequency neurotomy of lumbar medial branch
In above L5, The RF needle was placed to contact with bone as close as possible to the course of the target nerve in parallel. For L5 dorsal rami ablation, the needle was positioned in the groove between the S1 articular process and sacral ala. At each level, the electrodes were adjusted to optimize sensory stimulation at a frequency of 50 Hz and maximize multifidus contraction at 2 Hz. A 75 second 80°C lesion was made using an RF generator.
Sponsors
Severance Hospital
Study design
Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* All the patients who were diagnosed facet joint syndrome and underwent lumbar RF medial branch neurotomy between January 2009 and June 2014.
Exclusion criteria
* absence of 12-month follow-up data, the patients who underwent RF medial branch neurotomy on bilateral side or the patients who underwent surgery or other interventional procedures that might affect pain derived from lumbar facet joint during the follow-up period
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Long term effective duration | 1 years | Duration of pain score less than half of initial pain score |
Countries
South Korea
Outcome results
None listed