Skip to content

Medial Plica Syndrome of the Knee: Conservative Treatment Versus Arthroscopic Plica Resection - a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02578589
Enrollment
72
Registered
2015-10-19
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2017-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Plica Mediopatellaris

Brief summary

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the effect of conservative treatment in comparison to arthroscopic resection of pathological medial plicae of the knee for patients with medial plica syndrome. The investigators expect conservative treatment to be significantly superior to arthroscopic plica resection with regard to symptom remission and return to prior functional level.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPlica resection vs conservative treatment

Plica resection vs conservative treatment

Sponsors

Regionshospitalet Silkeborg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged over 18 years * History of antermedial knee pain * Palpable medial band in clinical examination or medial plica appearence on MRI * Absence of all of the following diagnoses: Osteoarthritis, osteochondritis dissecans, meniscal injury, patella subluxation, pes anserinus bursit, patellofemoral pain syndrome * Given declaration of consent * Joining a fitness centre for the duration of minimum 3 months at their own expense.

Exclusion criteria

Aged under 18 years * Presence of one or more of the following diagnoses: Osteoarthritis, osteochondritis dissecans, meniscal injury, patella subluxation, pes anserinus bursit, patellofemoral pain syndrome * Prior surgical intervention, infection, fracture or patellar luxation concerning the relevant knee * Not willing to join a fitness centre for the duration of minimum 3 months at their own expense

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lysholm-Scale (Units on a scale)2 yearsDifference of minimum 5 points concerning the average scoring outcome on the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scala in favor of patients undergoing conservative treatment in comparison to patients undergoing arthroscopic plica resection at 2 year follow up. Units of measure (Units on a scale)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kujala-Scale (Units on a scale)2 yearsSecondary endpoints: Higher average scoring outcome on the Anterior Knee Pain Scala (Kujala) in favor of patients undergoing conservative treatment in comparison to patients undergoing arthroscopic plica resection at 2 year follow up. Lower average results on Visual Anologue Scale concerning knee pain while walking indicated by patients undergoing conservative treatment in comparison to patients undergoing arthroscopic plica resection at 2 year follow up. Units of measure (Units on a scale)
QOL-Scale (Units on a scale)2 yearsHigher average scoring outcome on the Quality of Life Scala (extracted from KOOS) in favor of patients undergoing conservative treatment in comparison to patients undergoing arthroscopic plica resection at 2 year follow up. Units of measure (Units on a scale)
VAS-Scale (Visual Analog Scale for pain) (Units on a scale)2 yearsLower average results on Visual Anologue Scale concerning knee pain while walking indicated by patients undergoing conservative treatment in comparison to patients undergoing arthroscopic plica resection at 2 year follow up. Units of measure (Units on a scale)

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactSteffen Sauer, MD
sauer_steven@web.de004531560149

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026