Skip to content

Effect of Local Steroid Application on a Cervical Plate Versus Intravenous Steroids on Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF)

A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Local Steroid Application on a Cervical Plate Versus Intravenous Steroids on Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02577991
Enrollment
80
Registered
2015-10-16
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2019-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Spine

Brief summary

Local application of steroids in ACDF surgery will lead to decreased incidence of dysphagia compared to intravenous steroids or a control group

Detailed description

Dysphagia is a common complication after ACDF. PSTS is also a natural sequela of ACDF and can lead to airway compromise among other complications. Previous studies have demonstrated that administration of intravenous methylprednisolone (1mg/kg) after anterior cervical spine surgery reduced the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal lesions as identified by nasofibroscopic examination. Lee et al. prospectively evaluated 50 patients and determined that local application of steroids in the retropharyngeal area following ACDF reduced PSTS and odynophagia as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) compared to a control group. Furthermore, there were no adverse events/reactions from local application of steroid on a gel foam sponge in the setting of anterior spinal surgery. There are no studies in the current literature that investigate the incidence of dysphagia with application of local steroids after ACDF, nor are there any studies that stratify the efficacy of local steroids compared to intravenous steroids. There is also no current spine literature that directly compares the efficacy of intravenous steroids versus local steroids in the incidence of dysphagia or dysphonia. Our study will be the first in the literature to assess the efficacy of local steroids in reducing the incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery, and as a result, may improve patient outcomes after ACDF. Dysphagia and dysphonia are common complications after anterior cervical spine surgery. Despite their clinical importance, studies on the treatment and/or prevention of these complications are limited due to the lack of valid and reliable outcome measures. The majority of research is found in the otolaryngology literature and has focused on disease pathophysiology, diagnosis, and therapy. The Bazaz score has been used in the spine literature to evaluate dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). This is a subjective questionnaire that has not been validated in the literature. Additionally, new patient-centered outcome measures, the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) and Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) have recently been developed, and in addition to the Bazaz score, have been shown to have excellent validity and reliability in the ENT patient population. These instruments can be used to document the initial dysphagia or dysphonia severity and monitor the treatment response in people with a wide array of swallowing and voice disorders.

Interventions

10 mg of intraoperative intravenous decadron with gel foam sponge placed on cervical plate

DRUGTriamcinolone

40 mg of triamcinolone on gel foam sponge dabbed on the anterior cervical plate

Sponsors

Northwestern University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients undergoing ACDF (single or multi-level) for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy * All subjects must have given signed, informed consent prior to registration on study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing revision surgery, any operations for trauma, infection, tumor * Patients with general metabolic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, chronic heart and renal diseases.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Opbaseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year.Outcome measure used to measure the incidence and severity of postoperative trouble swallowing. Summative score of 10 questions (range 0-40) with each question scored 0-4 with higher scores indicating greater severity/frequency of difficulty or disability reported by the patient for the indicated activity; EAT-10 \>3 = dysphagia & EAT-10 \>15 = severe dysphagia
Percentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Opbaseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year.Outcome measure used to measure the incidence and severity of postoperative trouble with hoarseness of voice; summative score of 10 questions (range 0-40) with each question scored 0-4 with higher scores indicating greater severity/frequency of disability or handicap reported by the patient. Reported as a percentage of patients in each group reporting an 'abnormal' VHI-10 score defined as a summative score \>11
Neck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpObtained at baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 yearOutcome measure used to measure for neck pain that includes personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. Summative scores for 10 questions (range 0-50) with each question scored 0-5 where higher scores for each question indicates greater extent of disability/difficulty for the associated activity. Reported as a mean percentage + standard deviation of difficulty/disability experienced by the patient.
Median Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpObtained at baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year; analyzed for all time points through 6 months post opMost commonly utilized pain scale; scored 0-10 with higher values indicating increased severity of pain experienced by the patient
Percentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia ScoreEvaluated at baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 yearOutcome measure used to measure the incidence and severity of postoperative trouble swallowing

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control Group
No steroid
21
IV Steroid
10 mg of intraoperative intravenous decadron with gel foam sponge placed on cervical plate Decadron: 10 mg of intraoperative intravenous decadron with gel foam sponge placed on cervical plate
25
Local Steroid
40 mg of triamcinolone on gel foam sponge dabbed on the anterior cervical plate Triamcinolone: 40 mg of triamcinolone on gel foam sponge dabbed on the anterior cervical plate
29
Total75

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl GroupIV SteroidLocal SteroidTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants5 Participants6 Participants17 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants20 Participants23 Participants58 Participants
Age, Continuous54 years51.6 years55.6 years53.7 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
21 Participants25 Participants29 Participants75 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
21 Participants25 Participants29 Participants75 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 participants25 participants29 participants75 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants11 Participants14 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants14 Participants15 Participants40 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Median Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op

Most commonly utilized pain scale; scored 0-10 with higher values indicating increased severity of pain experienced by the patient

Time frame: Obtained at baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year; analyzed for all time points through 6 months post op

Population: All discrepancies between analyzed group participant totals and individual time point participant totals are due lack of patient response for follow-up data for the given time point despite multiple contact attempts by the research team

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Control GroupMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (1 yr. Post Op)4.0 Score on a scale
Control GroupMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (1 Day Post Op)7.00 Score on a scale
Control GroupMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (6 mo. Post Op)5.0 Score on a scale
Control GroupMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (Baseline)8.0 Score on a scale
Control GroupMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (2 wk. Post Op)6.00 Score on a scale
Control GroupMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (6 wk. Post Op)5.00 Score on a scale
Control GroupMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (3 mo. Post Op)4.5 Score on a scale
IV SteroidMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (Baseline)8.0 Score on a scale
IV SteroidMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (3 mo. Post Op)3.0 Score on a scale
IV SteroidMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (6 wk. Post Op)4.00 Score on a scale
IV SteroidMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (2 wk. Post Op)4.00 Score on a scale
IV SteroidMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (6 mo. Post Op)4.0 Score on a scale
IV SteroidMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (1 yr. Post Op)2.0 Score on a scale
IV SteroidMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (1 Day Post Op)6.00 Score on a scale
Local SteroidMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (1 yr. Post Op)1.0 Score on a scale
Local SteroidMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (Baseline)7.0 Score on a scale
Local SteroidMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (1 Day Post Op)6.00 Score on a scale
Local SteroidMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (2 wk. Post Op)4.00 Score on a scale
Local SteroidMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (6 wk. Post Op)5.00 Score on a scale
Local SteroidMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (3 mo. Post Op)3.00 Score on a scale
Local SteroidMedian Visual Analog Scale Pain Score for Patients From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpVAS Pain Score (6 mo. Post Op)5.00 Score on a scale
Primary

Neck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op

Outcome measure used to measure for neck pain that includes personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. Summative scores for 10 questions (range 0-50) with each question scored 0-5 where higher scores for each question indicates greater extent of disability/difficulty for the associated activity. Reported as a mean percentage + standard deviation of difficulty/disability experienced by the patient.

Time frame: Obtained at baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year

Population: All discrepancies between analyzed group participant totals and individual time point participant totals are due lack of patient response for follow-up data for the given time point despite multiple contact attempts by the research team

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op3 mo. Post Op NDI14.6 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 40
Control GroupNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op2 wk. Post Op NDI31 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 20
Control GroupNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op6 wk. Post Op NDI23 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 19
Control GroupNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op1 yr. Post Op NDI22.2 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 33.6
Control GroupNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op6 mo. Post Op NDI23 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 19
Control GroupNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op1 Day Post Op NDI27 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 14
Control GroupNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpBaseline NDI40 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 19
IV SteroidNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op2 wk. Post Op NDI24 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 15
IV SteroidNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpBaseline NDI34 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 18
IV SteroidNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op1 Day Post Op NDI28 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 16
IV SteroidNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op6 wk. Post Op NDI21 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 15
IV SteroidNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op3 mo. Post Op NDI11.1 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 23.3
IV SteroidNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op6 mo. Post Op NDI21 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 15
IV SteroidNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op1 yr. Post Op NDI4.0 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 18
Local SteroidNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op3 mo. Post Op NDI10 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 23.5
Local SteroidNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post OpBaseline NDI35 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 19
Local SteroidNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op1 yr. Post Op NDI6.0 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 26
Local SteroidNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op6 mo. Post Op NDI24 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 19
Local SteroidNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op6 wk. Post Op NDI24 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 19
Local SteroidNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op1 Day Post Op NDI27 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 18
Local SteroidNeck Disability Index (NDI) Mean Percentage Score From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op2 wk. Post Op NDI20 percentage of disability/difficultyStandard Deviation 16
Primary

Percentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op

Outcome measure used to measure the incidence and severity of postoperative trouble with hoarseness of voice; summative score of 10 questions (range 0-40) with each question scored 0-4 with higher scores indicating greater severity/frequency of disability or handicap reported by the patient. Reported as a percentage of patients in each group reporting an 'abnormal' VHI-10 score defined as a summative score \>11

Time frame: baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year.

Population: All discrepancies between analyzed group participant totals and individual time point participant totals are due lack of patient response for follow-up data for the given time point despite multiple contact attempts by the research team

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op2 wk. Post Op Abnormal VHI-1010.00 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 yr. Post Op Abnormal VHI-1010.53 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op3 mo. Post Op Abnormal VHI-1010.00 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 wk. Post Op Abnormal VHI-109.52 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 Day Post Op Abnormal VHI-104.76 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-OpBaseline Abnormal VHI-109.52 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 mo. Post Op Abnormal VHI-1010.53 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 mo. Post Op Abnormal VHI-108.33 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-OpBaseline Abnormal VHI-108.00 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 Day Post Op Abnormal VHI-104.00 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op2 wk. Post Op Abnormal VHI-1020.00 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 wk. Post Op Abnormal VHI-108.69 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op3 mo. Post Op Abnormal VHI-104.34 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 yr. Post Op Abnormal VHI-108.33 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 yr. Post Op Abnormal VHI-100.00 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op3 mo. Post Op Abnormal VHI-100.00 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 Day Post Op Abnormal VHI-103.57 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 mo. Post Op Abnormal VHI-103.44 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-OpBaseline Abnormal VHI-103.44 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 wk. Post Op Abnormal VHI-103.44 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Abnormal Vocal Handicap Measured by the VHI-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op2 wk. Post Op Abnormal VHI-100.00 percentage of patients
Primary

Percentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op

Outcome measure used to measure the incidence and severity of postoperative trouble swallowing. Summative score of 10 questions (range 0-40) with each question scored 0-4 with higher scores indicating greater severity/frequency of difficulty or disability reported by the patient for the indicated activity; EAT-10 \>3 = dysphagia & EAT-10 \>15 = severe dysphagia

Time frame: baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year.

Population: All discrepancies between analyzed group participant totals and individual time point participant totals are due lack of patient response for follow-up data for the given time point despite multiple contact attempts by the research team

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 mo. Post Op Severe Dysphagia0.00 percentage
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 wk. Post Op Dysphagia38.09 percentage
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 Day Post Op Severe Dysphagia38.09 percentage
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 yr. Post Op Severe Dysphagia10.52 percentage
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op2 wk. Post Op Severe Dysphagia20.00 percentage
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op2 wk. Post Op Dysphagia50.00 percentage
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 wk. Post Op Severe Dysphagia28.57 percentage
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-OpBaseline Dysphagia9.52 percentage
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op3 mo. Post Op Dysphagia20.00 percentage
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 mo. Post Op Dysphagia21.05 percentage
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-OpBaseline Severe Dysphagia0 percentage
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 yr. Post Op Dysphagia21.05 percentage
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op3 mo. Post Op Severe Dysphagia10.00 percentage
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 Day Post Op Dysphagia76.19 percentage
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 yr. Post Op Dysphagia0.00 percentage
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 yr. Post Op Severe Dysphagia0.00 percentage
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-OpBaseline Dysphagia16.00 percentage
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-OpBaseline Severe Dysphagia0 percentage
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 Day Post Op Dysphagia68.00 percentage
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 Day Post Op Severe Dysphagia32.00 percentage
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op2 wk. Post Op Dysphagia48.00 percentage
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op2 wk. Post Op Severe Dysphagia16.00 percentage
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 wk. Post Op Severe Dysphagia0.00 percentage
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op3 mo. Post Op Dysphagia8.69 percentage
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op3 mo. Post Op Severe Dysphagia0.00 percentage
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 mo. Post Op Dysphagia8.33 percentage
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 mo. Post Op Severe Dysphagia0.00 percentage
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 wk. Post Op Dysphagia34.78 percentage
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 wk. Post Op Severe Dysphagia0.00 percentage
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 yr. Post Op Dysphagia6.89 percentage
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op3 mo. Post Op Dysphagia6.89 percentage
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-OpBaseline Severe Dysphagia0 percentage
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 yr. Post Op Severe Dysphagia0.00 percentage
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op3 mo. Post Op Severe Dysphagia0.00 percentage
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-OpBaseline Dysphagia10.34 percentage
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op2 wk. Post Op Dysphagia27.58 percentage
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 Day Post Op Severe Dysphagia17.85 percentage
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 mo. Post Op Severe Dysphagia0.00 percentage
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op2 wk. Post Op Severe Dysphagia0.00 percentage
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op1 Day Post Op Dysphagia61.90 percentage
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 wk. Post Op Dysphagia17.24 percentage
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Dysphagia/Severe Dysphagia Through EAT-10 From Baseline Through 1 Year Post-Op6 mo. Post Op Dysphagia13.79 percentage
Primary

Percentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score

Outcome measure used to measure the incidence and severity of postoperative trouble swallowing

Time frame: Evaluated at baseline, post op day 1, post op 2 weeks, post op 6 weeks, post op 3 months, post op 6 months, and post op 1 year

Population: All discrepancies between analyzed group participant totals and individual time point participant totals are due lack of patient response for follow-up data for the given time point despite multiple contact attempts by the research team

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score6 mo. Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)15.78 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score2 wk. Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)15.00 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score1 Day Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)61.90 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score3 mo. Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)15.00 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score6 wk. Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)28.57 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia ScoreBaseline Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)0.00 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score3 mo. Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)15.00 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score6 wk. Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)23.80 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score6 mo. Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)5.26 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score1 Day Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)33.33 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score1 yr. Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)5.26 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia ScoreBaseline Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)4.76 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score2 wk. Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)30.00 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score1 yr. Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)15.78 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score6 mo. Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)8.33 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia ScoreBaseline Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)0.00 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia ScoreBaseline Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)0.00 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score1 Day Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)44.00 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score1 Day Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)24.00 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score2 wk. Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)16.00 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score2 wk. Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)16.00 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score6 wk. Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)17.39 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score6 wk. Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)8.69 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score3 mo. Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)13.04 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score3 mo. Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)0.00 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score6 mo. Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)0.00 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score1 yr. Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)0.00 percentage of patients
IV SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score1 yr. Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)0.00 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score1 yr. Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)3.44 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score3 mo. Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)0.00 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score2 wk. Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)13.79 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score1 Day Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)7.14 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score6 mo. Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)13.79 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score1 Day Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)50.00 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia ScoreBaseline Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)6.89 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score6 mo. Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)0.00 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia ScoreBaseline Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)0.00 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score6 wk. Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)0.00 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score6 wk. Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)6.89 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score1 yr. Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)3.44 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score3 mo. Post Op Bazaz Score (Mild or Greater)13.79 percentage of patients
Local SteroidPercentage of Patients Reporting Mild/Moderate/Severe Dysphagia From Baseline Through 1 Year Post Op Measured With Bazaz Dysphagia Score2 wk. Post Op Bazaz Score (Moderate-Severe)0.00 percentage of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026