Skip to content

Stability of the Medial Pivot Total Knee Prosthesis

Stability of the Medial Pivot Total Knee Prosthesis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02577978
Enrollment
61
Registered
2015-10-16
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2023-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis of Knee

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare objective and subjective measures of knee stability following total knee arthroplasty with a medial pivot design vs. a posterior stabilized design.

Detailed description

Several different prostheses are available for use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). These designs aim to replicate the normal kinematics of the knee joint while maintaining stability throughout a full range of motion. The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) contributes to these functions in the native knee, and if preserved it can function similarly in the prosthetic knee. Prostheses in which the PCL is sacrificed, and its function not replaced by other means, have poorer outcomes. However, various problems with preserving the PCL, including PCL deterioration in arthritic knees and difficulties with proper tensioning, have led to the development of alternative ways to emulate normal femoral rollback and sagittal plane stability. These posterior-substituted (PS) designs substitute for the PCL with either a cam and post mechanism or a symmetrical ultra-congruent tibial insert. The cruciate-retaining (CR) and PS designs, together with advances in surgical techniques and component materials, have achieved excellent implant survivorship with rates of \> 90% at 20 years. Reports of functional outcomes, however, have been variable. One potential area for improvement in TKA is optimization of implant design to better approximate native knee kinematics. In the normal knee, the medial condyle remains stable in the sagittal plane, functioning like a ball-and-socket, whereas the lateral condyle translates anterior to posterior during flexion. The designs of the CR and PS knees do not allow for this medial-centered rotation. Analysis has revealed paradoxical anterior sliding of the femur during flexion, abnormal axial rotation, and condylar lift-off. Edge loading and increased sagittal plane motion may predispose to accelerated polyethylene wear. The posterior stabilized design uses a cam-and-post mechanism in which one piece of the prosthesis has a plastic post that fits into a slot in the other piece of the prosthesis. A newer design that attempts to address these issues is the medial pivot knee (MP). This design is characterized by an asymmetrical tibial insert in which the medial compartment is ultra-congruent, providing antero-posterior stability and the lateral compartment allows for rollback around a medial axis of rotation i.e uses a ball-and-socket mechanism. This design more accurately recreates normal knee kinematics, reduces anteroposterior instability, and avoids condylar lift-off. Early studies indicate improved polyethylene wear characteristics. Midterm studies report excellent implant survivorship and clinical outcomes. Several randomized trials have compared the MP knee favorably with other designs. Patients with bilateral TKAs with a different prosthesis on each side preferred their medial pivot knee to a PS, CR, or mobile-bearing (MB) design. A trial comparing the MP and PS designs found greater range of motion (ROM) and better patient-reported outcomes in the MP group at 2 years. There also exists literature reporting poorer outcomes with the MP design. A trial involving 96 patients who had received both an MP knee and an MB knee on contralateral sides found lower ROM, higher complication rates, and worse patient reported outcomes in the MP knee. Given the lack of consensus in the literature, further investigation is warranted to determine the impact of the MP design on outcomes following TKA.

Interventions

DEVICEMedacta GMK posterior stabilized prosthesis
DEVICEMedacta GMK Sphere prosthesis

Sponsors

Northwestern University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-85, regardless of gender, ethnicity, or pathology * Must require a total knee arthroplasty * All subjects must have given signed, informed consent prior to registration in study.

Exclusion criteria

* Minors * Any patients that are unable to consent * Patients with active infection or osseous tumor of the operative extremity * Patients undergoing revision surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Score for the Knee Society Score (KSS) Function Component at 1 Year Post-operatively12 months post-operativelyPhysician completed Knee Society Score questionnaire used to measure a patient's functional ability before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA); score range is reported between 0-100 with improvement in outcomes reflected as a higher numerical value (e.g. a 'complete' return to pre-disease functionality would be reported as a score of 100)
Total Score Calculated Using the Forgotten Joint Score in Order to Assess the Subject's Ability to Forget the Artificial Joint in Everyday Life12 months post-operativelyPatient completed questionnaire used to assess the patients' ability to forget about a joint as a result of successful treatment. Every question is scored 1 (never) to 5 (mostly) according to the selected response categories. Thus, the raw score ranges from 12 to 60 where a high score indicates an improved outcome. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale and then reversed to obtain the final score with higher scores indicating improved physical function/reduced impact of symptoms on activity: Final score = 100 - ((sum(item01 to item12) - 12)/48\*100)
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Questionnaire Assessed Through 2 Years Post-opPre-operatively, 6 weeks post-operatively, 3 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, and 2 years post-operatively.The International Knee Documentation Committe (IKDC) Questionnaire is a subjective scale that provides patients with an overall function score based on a summative score for 3 sub categories (knee function, sports activities, pain/symptoms). A score between 0-100 is obtained as the sum of scores for each individual question, with increasing composite scores correlating positively with patient functional status/quality of life.
Score for the Knee Society Score (KSS) Knee Component at 1 Year Post-operatively12 months post-operativelyPhysician completed Knee Society Score questionnaire used to measure a patient's functional ability before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA); score range is reported between 0-100 with improvement in outcomes reflected as a higher numerical value (e.g. a 'complete' return to pre-disease functionality would be reported as a score of 100)
Oxford Knee Score (OKS) Pre-operative Through 2 Years Post-operativePre-operatively on day of surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-operativelyPatient completed Oxford Knee Score questionnaire used to assess the patient's perspective of outcome following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA); score range is reported between 0-48 with improvement in outcomes reflected as a higher numerical value (e.g. a 'complete' return to pre-disease functionality would be reported as a score of 48)
Veteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Mental Composite Score (MCS) Through 2 Years Post OperativePre-operatively, 6 weeks post-operatively, 3 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, and 2 years post-operatively.Veteran's RAND 12 Item Health Survey used to assess health-related quality of life, to estimate disease burden, and to evaluate disease-specific benchmarks. Scores for the Mental Composite Score (MCS) range from 5.2 to 76.3 and are evaluated as a summative T-score with population mean of 50 (Standard Deviation = 10);higher scores indicate improved mental wellness/function as reported by patients.
Veteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS) Through 2 Years Post OperativePre-operatively, 6 weeks post-operatively, 3 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, and 2 years post-operatively.Veteran's RAND 12 Item Health Survey used to assess health-related quality of life, to estimate disease burden, and to evaluate disease-specific benchmarks. Scores for the Physical Composite Score (MCS) range from 6.3 to 71.8 and are evaluated as a summative T-score with population mean of 50 (Standard Deviation = 10);higher scores indicate improved physical wellness/function as reported by patients.
PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Physical Function Through 2 Years Post-operativePre-operatively, 6 weeks post-operatively, 3 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, and 2 years post-operatively.Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures use answers that patients provide to questions to produce numeric values which indicate patients' state of wellbeing or suffering as well as their ability or lack of ability to function. Values are reported as T-scores with a reference population mean of 50 (SD=10); for the Physical Function domain higher scores indicated improved physical function as reported by the patient
PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Interference Through 2 Years Post-operativePre-operatively, 6 weeks post-operatively, 3 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, and 2 years post-operatively.Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures use answers that patients provide to questions to produce numeric values which indicate patients' state of wellbeing or suffering as well as their ability or lack of ability to function. Values are reported as T-scores with a reference population mean of 50 (SD=10); for the Pain Interference domain an increased value indicates greater severity/frequency of pain reported by the patient.
PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Behavior Through 2 Years Post-operativePre-operatively, 6 weeks post-operatively, 3 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, and 2 years post-operatively.Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures use answers that patients provide to questions to produce numeric values which indicate patients' state of wellbeing or suffering as well as their ability or lack of ability to function. Values are reported as T-scores with a reference population mean of 50 (SD=10); for the Pain Behavior domain an increased value indicates greater severity/frequency of pain reported by the patient

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessing Knee Stability Using the KT-1000 Arthrometer (at 30 Degrees)1 year post-operativelyUsed for grading the stability of the knee in various degrees of flexion according to section 4 of the International Knee Documentation Committee's Knee Ligament Standard Evaluation Form where normal (-1 to 2 mm); nearly normal (3 to 5 mm); abnormal (6 to 10 mm); severely abnormal (\>10 mm)
Get-up-and-Go TestBetween 6 months and 1 year post-operativelyUsed to assess a person's mobility and requires both static and dynamic balance. It uses the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three metres, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
Assessing Knee Stability Using the KT-1000 Arthrometer (at 90 Degrees)1 year post-operativelyUsed for grading the stability of the knee in various degrees of flexion according to section 4 of the International Knee Documentation Committee's Knee Ligament Standard Evaluation Form where normal (-1 to 2 mm); nearly normal (3 to 5 mm); abnormal (6 to 10 mm); severely abnormal (\>10 mm)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Medacta Sphere
Ball-and-socket Medacta GMK Sphere prosthesis
25
Medacta PS
Cam-and-post Medacta GMK posterior stabilized prosthesis
25
Total50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMedacta SphereMedacta PSTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
14 Participants10 Participants24 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants15 Participants26 Participants
Age, Continuous67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
Body Mass Index (BMI)32.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.82
34.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.81
33.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.81
Coronary Artery Disease4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Diabetes Mellitus3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
25 Participants25 Participants50 Participants
History of VTE4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Hypertension20 Participants18 Participants38 Participants
Pre-Operative Ambulatory Status
Cane
10 Participants6 Participants16 Participants
Pre-Operative Ambulatory Status
Unassisted
11 Participants16 Participants27 Participants
Pre-Operative Ambulatory Status
Walker
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Pre-operative Narcotic Use4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
13 Participants15 Participants28 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants10 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants25 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants15 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants10 Participants17 Participants
Tobacco Use3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Questionnaire Assessed Through 2 Years Post-op

The International Knee Documentation Committe (IKDC) Questionnaire is a subjective scale that provides patients with an overall function score based on a summative score for 3 sub categories (knee function, sports activities, pain/symptoms). A score between 0-100 is obtained as the sum of scores for each individual question, with increasing composite scores correlating positively with patient functional status/quality of life.

Time frame: Pre-operatively, 6 weeks post-operatively, 3 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, and 2 years post-operatively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medacta SphereInternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Questionnaire Assessed Through 2 Years Post-opBaseline IKDC Composite35.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.72
Medacta SphereInternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Questionnaire Assessed Through 2 Years Post-op6 mo. IKDC Composite48.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.08
Medacta SphereInternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Questionnaire Assessed Through 2 Years Post-op1 yr. IKDC Composite57.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.79
Medacta SphereInternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Questionnaire Assessed Through 2 Years Post-op6 wk. IKDC Composite42.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.19
Medacta SphereInternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Questionnaire Assessed Through 2 Years Post-op2 yr. IKDC Composite51.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.67
Medacta SphereInternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Questionnaire Assessed Through 2 Years Post-op3 mo. IKDC Composite50.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.44
Medacta PSInternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Questionnaire Assessed Through 2 Years Post-op2 yr. IKDC Composite49.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.56
Medacta PSInternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Questionnaire Assessed Through 2 Years Post-op6 mo. IKDC Composite48.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.73
Medacta PSInternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Questionnaire Assessed Through 2 Years Post-opBaseline IKDC Composite35.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.97
Medacta PSInternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Questionnaire Assessed Through 2 Years Post-op3 mo. IKDC Composite44.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
Medacta PSInternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Questionnaire Assessed Through 2 Years Post-op1 yr. IKDC Composite52.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.23
Medacta PSInternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Questionnaire Assessed Through 2 Years Post-op6 wk. IKDC Composite43.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.68
Primary

Oxford Knee Score (OKS) Pre-operative Through 2 Years Post-operative

Patient completed Oxford Knee Score questionnaire used to assess the patient's perspective of outcome following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA); score range is reported between 0-48 with improvement in outcomes reflected as a higher numerical value (e.g. a 'complete' return to pre-disease functionality would be reported as a score of 48)

Time frame: Pre-operatively on day of surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-operatively

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medacta SphereOxford Knee Score (OKS) Pre-operative Through 2 Years Post-operative6 mo. Post Op Oxford Knee Score33.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
Medacta SphereOxford Knee Score (OKS) Pre-operative Through 2 Years Post-operativeBaseline Oxford Knee Score16.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.66
Medacta SphereOxford Knee Score (OKS) Pre-operative Through 2 Years Post-operative1 yr. Post Op Oxford Knee Score39.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.97
Medacta SphereOxford Knee Score (OKS) Pre-operative Through 2 Years Post-operative3 mo. Post Op Oxford Knee Score32.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.35
Medacta SphereOxford Knee Score (OKS) Pre-operative Through 2 Years Post-operative2 yr. Post Op Oxford Knee Score40.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.56
Medacta SphereOxford Knee Score (OKS) Pre-operative Through 2 Years Post-operative6 wk. Post Op Oxford Knee Score29.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.64
Medacta PSOxford Knee Score (OKS) Pre-operative Through 2 Years Post-operative2 yr. Post Op Oxford Knee Score38.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
Medacta PSOxford Knee Score (OKS) Pre-operative Through 2 Years Post-operative6 wk. Post Op Oxford Knee Score28.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.77
Medacta PSOxford Knee Score (OKS) Pre-operative Through 2 Years Post-operative3 mo. Post Op Oxford Knee Score32.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.47
Medacta PSOxford Knee Score (OKS) Pre-operative Through 2 Years Post-operative6 mo. Post Op Oxford Knee Score36.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.58
Medacta PSOxford Knee Score (OKS) Pre-operative Through 2 Years Post-operative1 yr. Post Op Oxford Knee Score35.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.33
Medacta PSOxford Knee Score (OKS) Pre-operative Through 2 Years Post-operativeBaseline Oxford Knee Score19.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.39
Primary

PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Behavior Through 2 Years Post-operative

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures use answers that patients provide to questions to produce numeric values which indicate patients' state of wellbeing or suffering as well as their ability or lack of ability to function. Values are reported as T-scores with a reference population mean of 50 (SD=10); for the Pain Behavior domain an increased value indicates greater severity/frequency of pain reported by the patient

Time frame: Pre-operatively, 6 weeks post-operatively, 3 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, and 2 years post-operatively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Behavior Through 2 Years Post-operativeBaseline PROMIS Pain Behavior60.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.22
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Behavior Through 2 Years Post-operative3 mo. PROMIS Pain Behavior54.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.78
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Behavior Through 2 Years Post-operative2 yr. PROMIS Pain Behavior42.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.09
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Behavior Through 2 Years Post-operative6 wk. PROMIS Pain Behavior56.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.27
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Behavior Through 2 Years Post-operative1 yr. PROMIS Pain Behavior45.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.31
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Behavior Through 2 Years Post-operative6 mo. PROMIS Pain Behavior53.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.72
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Behavior Through 2 Years Post-operative2 yr. PROMIS Pain Behavior46.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.36
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Behavior Through 2 Years Post-operative1 yr. PROMIS Pain Behavior47.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.43
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Behavior Through 2 Years Post-operativeBaseline PROMIS Pain Behavior60.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.88
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Behavior Through 2 Years Post-operative6 wk. PROMIS Pain Behavior58.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Behavior Through 2 Years Post-operative3 mo. PROMIS Pain Behavior53.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.41
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Behavior Through 2 Years Post-operative6 mo. PROMIS Pain Behavior51.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.27
Primary

PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Interference Through 2 Years Post-operative

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures use answers that patients provide to questions to produce numeric values which indicate patients' state of wellbeing or suffering as well as their ability or lack of ability to function. Values are reported as T-scores with a reference population mean of 50 (SD=10); for the Pain Interference domain an increased value indicates greater severity/frequency of pain reported by the patient.

Time frame: Pre-operatively, 6 weeks post-operatively, 3 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, and 2 years post-operatively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Interference Through 2 Years Post-operative6 wk. PROMIS Pain Interference58.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.59
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Interference Through 2 Years Post-operativeBaseline PROMIS Pain Interference66.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.73
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Interference Through 2 Years Post-operative3 mo. PROMIS Pain Interference55.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.48
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Interference Through 2 Years Post-operative6 mo. PROMIS Pain Interference52.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.31
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Interference Through 2 Years Post-operative1 yr. PROMIS Pain Interference46.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.22
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Interference Through 2 Years Post-operative2 yr. PROMIS Pain Interference44.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.63
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Interference Through 2 Years Post-operative1 yr. PROMIS Pain Interference49.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.22
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Interference Through 2 Years Post-operative3 mo. PROMIS Pain Interference55.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Interference Through 2 Years Post-operative6 mo. PROMIS Pain Interference53.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.35
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Interference Through 2 Years Post-operativeBaseline PROMIS Pain Interference65.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.39
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Interference Through 2 Years Post-operative6 wk. PROMIS Pain Interference58.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.62
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Interference Through 2 Years Post-operative2 yr. PROMIS Pain Interference46.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.96
Primary

PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Physical Function Through 2 Years Post-operative

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures use answers that patients provide to questions to produce numeric values which indicate patients' state of wellbeing or suffering as well as their ability or lack of ability to function. Values are reported as T-scores with a reference population mean of 50 (SD=10); for the Physical Function domain higher scores indicated improved physical function as reported by the patient

Time frame: Pre-operatively, 6 weeks post-operatively, 3 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, and 2 years post-operatively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Physical Function Through 2 Years Post-operativeBaseline PROMIS Physical Function32.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.44
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Physical Function Through 2 Years Post-operative6 wk. PROMIS Physical Function38.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.95
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Physical Function Through 2 Years Post-operative3 mo. PROMIS Physical Function42.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.14
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Physical Function Through 2 Years Post-operative6 mo. PROMIS Physical Function43.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.26
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Physical Function Through 2 Years Post-operative1 yr. PROMIS Physical Function48.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.22
Medacta SpherePROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Physical Function Through 2 Years Post-operative2 yr. PROMIS Physical Function49.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.84
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Physical Function Through 2 Years Post-operative3 mo. PROMIS Physical Function41.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.76
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Physical Function Through 2 Years Post-operativeBaseline PROMIS Physical Function31.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.27
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Physical Function Through 2 Years Post-operative1 yr. PROMIS Physical Function48.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.25
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Physical Function Through 2 Years Post-operative6 wk. PROMIS Physical Function39.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.45
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Physical Function Through 2 Years Post-operative2 yr. PROMIS Physical Function46.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.97
Medacta PSPROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Physical Function Through 2 Years Post-operative6 mo. PROMIS Physical Function45.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.09
Primary

Score for the Knee Society Score (KSS) Function Component at 1 Year Post-operatively

Physician completed Knee Society Score questionnaire used to measure a patient's functional ability before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA); score range is reported between 0-100 with improvement in outcomes reflected as a higher numerical value (e.g. a 'complete' return to pre-disease functionality would be reported as a score of 100)

Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medacta SphereScore for the Knee Society Score (KSS) Function Component at 1 Year Post-operatively81.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9
Medacta PSScore for the Knee Society Score (KSS) Function Component at 1 Year Post-operatively77.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
Primary

Score for the Knee Society Score (KSS) Knee Component at 1 Year Post-operatively

Physician completed Knee Society Score questionnaire used to measure a patient's functional ability before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA); score range is reported between 0-100 with improvement in outcomes reflected as a higher numerical value (e.g. a 'complete' return to pre-disease functionality would be reported as a score of 100)

Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medacta SphereScore for the Knee Society Score (KSS) Knee Component at 1 Year Post-operatively88.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Medacta PSScore for the Knee Society Score (KSS) Knee Component at 1 Year Post-operatively86.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
Primary

Total Score Calculated Using the Forgotten Joint Score in Order to Assess the Subject's Ability to Forget the Artificial Joint in Everyday Life

Patient completed questionnaire used to assess the patients' ability to forget about a joint as a result of successful treatment. Every question is scored 1 (never) to 5 (mostly) according to the selected response categories. Thus, the raw score ranges from 12 to 60 where a high score indicates an improved outcome. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale and then reversed to obtain the final score with higher scores indicating improved physical function/reduced impact of symptoms on activity: Final score = 100 - ((sum(item01 to item12) - 12)/48\*100)

Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medacta SphereTotal Score Calculated Using the Forgotten Joint Score in Order to Assess the Subject's Ability to Forget the Artificial Joint in Everyday Life57.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.6
Medacta PSTotal Score Calculated Using the Forgotten Joint Score in Order to Assess the Subject's Ability to Forget the Artificial Joint in Everyday Life54.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 41.6
Primary

Veteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Mental Composite Score (MCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative

Veteran's RAND 12 Item Health Survey used to assess health-related quality of life, to estimate disease burden, and to evaluate disease-specific benchmarks. Scores for the Mental Composite Score (MCS) range from 5.2 to 76.3 and are evaluated as a summative T-score with population mean of 50 (Standard Deviation = 10);higher scores indicate improved mental wellness/function as reported by patients.

Time frame: Pre-operatively, 6 weeks post-operatively, 3 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, and 2 years post-operatively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medacta SphereVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Mental Composite Score (MCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative6 mo. VR-12 MCS53.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.79
Medacta SphereVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Mental Composite Score (MCS) Through 2 Years Post OperativeBaseline VR-12 MCS44.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.13
Medacta SphereVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Mental Composite Score (MCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative6 wk. VR-12 MCS49.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.69
Medacta SphereVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Mental Composite Score (MCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative3 mo. VR-12 MCS51.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.74
Medacta SphereVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Mental Composite Score (MCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative2 yr. VR-12 MCS54.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.54
Medacta SphereVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Mental Composite Score (MCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative1 yr. VR-12 MCS53.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.22
Medacta PSVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Mental Composite Score (MCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative2 yr. VR-12 MCS54.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.27
Medacta PSVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Mental Composite Score (MCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative3 mo. VR-12 MCS53.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.71
Medacta PSVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Mental Composite Score (MCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative6 mo. VR-12 MCS53.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.75
Medacta PSVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Mental Composite Score (MCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative1 yr. VR-12 MCS54.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.47
Medacta PSVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Mental Composite Score (MCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative6 wk. VR-12 MCS59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.18
Medacta PSVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Mental Composite Score (MCS) Through 2 Years Post OperativeBaseline VR-12 MCS54.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.35
Primary

Veteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative

Veteran's RAND 12 Item Health Survey used to assess health-related quality of life, to estimate disease burden, and to evaluate disease-specific benchmarks. Scores for the Physical Composite Score (MCS) range from 6.3 to 71.8 and are evaluated as a summative T-score with population mean of 50 (Standard Deviation = 10);higher scores indicate improved physical wellness/function as reported by patients.

Time frame: Pre-operatively, 6 weeks post-operatively, 3 months post-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively, and 2 years post-operatively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medacta SphereVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative2 yr. VR-12 PCS42.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.08
Medacta SphereVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative6 wk. VR-12 PCS34.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
Medacta SphereVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative1 yr. VR-12 PCS46.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.22
Medacta SphereVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative3 mo. VR-12 PCS38.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.58
Medacta SphereVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS) Through 2 Years Post OperativeBaseline VR-12 PCS26.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Medacta SphereVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative6 mo. VR-12 PCS39.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.23
Medacta PSVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative6 mo. VR-12 PCS42.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.25
Medacta PSVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative1 yr. VR-12 PCS42.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.54
Medacta PSVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative2 yr. VR-12 PCS46.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.85
Medacta PSVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS) Through 2 Years Post OperativeBaseline VR-12 PCS23.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.71
Medacta PSVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative6 wk. VR-12 PCS34.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
Medacta PSVeteran's RAND 12 (VR-12) Physical Composite Score (PCS) Through 2 Years Post Operative3 mo. VR-12 PCS35.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.28
Secondary

Assessing Knee Stability Using the KT-1000 Arthrometer (at 30 Degrees)

Used for grading the stability of the knee in various degrees of flexion according to section 4 of the International Knee Documentation Committee's Knee Ligament Standard Evaluation Form where normal (-1 to 2 mm); nearly normal (3 to 5 mm); abnormal (6 to 10 mm); severely abnormal (\>10 mm)

Time frame: 1 year post-operatively

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medacta SphereAssessing Knee Stability Using the KT-1000 Arthrometer (at 30 Degrees)5.6 millimetersStandard Deviation 1.9
Medacta PSAssessing Knee Stability Using the KT-1000 Arthrometer (at 30 Degrees)10.2 millimetersStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Assessing Knee Stability Using the KT-1000 Arthrometer (at 90 Degrees)

Used for grading the stability of the knee in various degrees of flexion according to section 4 of the International Knee Documentation Committee's Knee Ligament Standard Evaluation Form where normal (-1 to 2 mm); nearly normal (3 to 5 mm); abnormal (6 to 10 mm); severely abnormal (\>10 mm)

Time frame: 1 year post-operatively

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medacta SphereAssessing Knee Stability Using the KT-1000 Arthrometer (at 90 Degrees)4.1 millimetersStandard Deviation 2
Medacta PSAssessing Knee Stability Using the KT-1000 Arthrometer (at 90 Degrees)5.6 millimetersStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

Get-up-and-Go Test

Used to assess a person's mobility and requires both static and dynamic balance. It uses the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three metres, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.

Time frame: Between 6 months and 1 year post-operatively

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medacta SphereGet-up-and-Go Test10.2 secondsStandard Deviation 3.7
Medacta PSGet-up-and-Go Test10.5 secondsStandard Deviation 5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026