Skip to content

Establishing the Language Network With Independent Component Analysis of Resting State MRI

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02577757
Acronym
ICA Langage
Enrollment
120
Registered
2015-10-16
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2016-05-31
Last updated
2015-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Languages

Keywords

Languages network, Functional MRI

Brief summary

Proceed to an analysis of sensitivity and specificity results of the fMRI language network obtained in two ways: by providing a conventional language test and independent component analysis. These two methods will be compared to the reference method what the cortical intraoperative mapping.

Detailed description

Patients with brain tumors including malignant gliomas located in eloquent areas have long been considered inoperable because of median survival and predictable postoperative sequelae. The improved prognosis with chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection as complete as possible questioned this attitude. The goal is to operate those patients without additional disabilities. The cortical electrostimulation intraoperative mapping in awake surgery can meet the eloquent areas. Identifying with fMRI these same areas to better specify in advance the way initially and shortened the time to awake exploratory surgery which improves patient comfort. However anxiety induced by the review in a pre-operative setting, a debutante aphasia often make problematic the realization of a formal language test. The analysis in the low frequency of spontaneous oscillations of large neuronal networks can help isolate network of language at rest without particular language test at the group analysis. This methodology, however, needs to be validated at the individual level before it can be applied to pathology. Proceed to an analysis of sensitivity and specificity results of the fMRI language network obtained in two ways: by providing a conventional language test and independent component analysis. These two methods will be compared to the reference method what the cortical intraoperative mapping.

Interventions

DEVICEMRI

MRI

Sponsors

University Hospital, Angers
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Persons major and minor. * Having given their written consent, or whose parents have given their written consent for minors. * Affiliated with the social security system * All patients eligible adults in awake surgery * Affiliated with the social security system * patient given their written consent

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to MRI * Pregnant or breastfeeding women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
MRI data obtained by comparing a formal language test to data obtained by a session of rest independent component analyzed in patients and volunteers1 hour

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactARAM TER MINASSIAN, physician
ArTerMinassian@chu-angers.fr+33.2.41.35.52.31

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026