Muscle Tone Abnormalities
Conditions
Keywords
Trigger Points, Dry needling, Torque, H-Reflex
Brief summary
The main objective of this study is to analyze the effect of dry needling of the soleus muscle to modulate muscle tone in healthy non-injured subjects. The secondary objective is to study if effects occur due to changes in the neural or mechanical component (or both). Hypothesis: Deep Dry Needling of the latent medial Myofascial Trigger Point (MTrP) of the soleus muscle produces changes in muscle tone varying the passive resistance torque at a rate of 180º/ s.
Detailed description
Methods: It is a double-blinded randomized clinical trial where subjects are healthy volunteers from the city of Toledo between 18 and 40 years. There will be an intervention group (dry needling into the medial MTrP of soleus muscle) and a control group (dry needling distal to the MTrP but into the taut muscle band of soleus muscle). The intervention will be a unique session. Intervention: Dry needling technique will be performed by locating the taut band and the Myofascial Trigger Point. After that, a thin needle (0,32x40mm) is introduced directly into a Myofascial Trigger Point with the aims to generate a local twitch response that are involuntary contractions of the muscle fibers. This puncture may reproduce patient's symptoms, and causes muscle relaxation to achieve at the same time the relief of muscle tension and pain and also to recover the metabolism of the muscle. Assessment: The mechanical and the neural properties of muscle tone were evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometry and H-reflex test measurement, respectively Isokinetic dynamometric technique is considered a valid biomechanics method to measure muscle tone in non-injured subjects. The H-reflex has been utilized as a probe to study neurophysiological phenomena. This measurement can be used to assess the response of the nervous system to various neurologic conditions, musculoskeletal injuries, application of therapeutic modalities, pain, exercise training, and performance of motor tasks. Outcome measures: Outcome measures will include passive resistive torque to ankle dorsiflexion, dorsiflexion passive range of motion (PROM), maximal isometric voluntary force (MIVF) and H-reflex and M-response measurements and they will be evaluated before, at 10 min and 1 week after the intervention.
Interventions
Deep Dry Needling into the site of the latent medial Myofascial Trigger Point of the soleus muscle. 1 session in soleus muscle moving the needle up and down ten times.
DEVICEControl-Dry Needling
Deep Dry Needling distal to Myofascial Trigger Point but into the same taut band. 1 session in soleus muscle moving the needle up and down ten times.
Sponsors
Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos de Toledo
Universidad San Jorge
University of Castilla-La Mancha
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Age range 18-40 years. * Healthy volunteers. * Presence of a latent medial MTrP of the soleus muscle. * Being able to provide written informed consent. * Being able to follow instructions and realize clinical tests.
Exclusion criteria
* Any history of ipsilateral lower limb severe injury or intervention (e.g. fracture, surgical intervention). * Pain or musculoskeletal injury, ligament injury, tendonitis or plantar fasciitis in the ipsilateral leg for six months previous to the intervention. * Peripheral or central nervous system neurological disease. * Altered sensitivity in the treatment area. * Treatment of a myofascial trigger point in the sural triceps in the six months previous to the intervention. * Changes in physical activity which would have affected muscle tone during the study. * Fear of needles. * No tolerance to pain caused by dry needling. * No continuance commitment.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Ratio Hmax/Mmax. | Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention). | Ratio between maximal H-reflex and maximal M-wave. |
| Change in Dorsiflexion passive range of motion. | Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention). | Soleus muscle extensibility (Dorsiflexion angle of ankle obtained by a force of 200 N and by the maximal tolerated force applied to gastrocnemius muscles). |
| Change in Passive resistive torque to ankle dorsiflexion. | Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention). | Passive resistive torque to ankle dorsiflexion at slow (10º/s) and fast (180º/s) velocities. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in M response. | Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention). | Maximal M wave and M wave threshold. |
| Change in Maximal voluntary isometric force. | Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention). | Maximal voluntary isometric force test of Triceps Surae muscle and Tibialis Anterior muscle. |
| Change in H reflex. | Pre-intervention (Day 1); After intervention (Day 1); Follow up (1 week after intervention). | Maximal H reflex, H reflex threshold and normalized H at 25% Mmax. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pain perception after intervention using Visual analogical scale. | After intervention (Day 1). | Pain perception after intervention using Visual analogical scale (VAS). |
| Number of Local twitch responses. | During intervention (Day 1). | Number of local twitch responses during intervention. |
Countries
Spain
Outcome results
None listed