Skip to content

Acute Mechanical Response to Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy

Acute Mechanical Response to Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02575534
Acronym
AAD and CRT
Enrollment
0
Registered
2015-10-14
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2018-02-27
Last updated
2018-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arrhythmias

Keywords

anti-arrhythmic therapy

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to determine if anti-arrhythmic drugs with a sodium channel-blocking mechanism exert a detrimental electromechanical effect on cardiac function in patients depending upon baseline intraventricular conduction and left ventricular function.

Detailed description

Amiodarone therapy is used frequently for control of ventricular arrhythmias in patients who receive painful shocks from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Data in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients and ICD patients suggest that amiodarone is mortality-neutral; it neither confers increased nor decreased mortality. However, these data are derived from patients largely with normal intraventricular conduction, manifesting as a QRS complex duration on the surface ECG \<120 ms. Amiodarone, in addition to potassium-channel blocking effects, is a sodium channel-blocker. Because sodium channels mediate cardiac depolarization, and a QRS complex \>120 ms is indicative of abnormal depolarization, amiodarone may not be benign in patients with such conduction defects. Patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (CRT-D), who all have abnormal baseline intraventricular conduction, may therefore be adversely affected by amiodarone. Anecdotal clinical data suggest that this may be the case, but the question of amiodarone's cardiac safety profile in CRT patients has never been studied.

Interventions

the procainamide will be infused at 12mcg/kg up to a max of 1 gram at a rate of 20mg/min which will take up to 1 hour to infuse

Sponsors

University of Pittsburgh
CollaboratorOTHER
Evan Adelstein, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Implanted cardiac device requiring generator change and a new device * Able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Current membrane-active anti-arrhythmic * Glomerular filtration rate (GRF)\<30 milliliters (mL)/min * MAP\<60 mmHg * Known intolerance to procainamide * Pregnancy * Age \<18 or \>85 years old * Baseline QT interval \>480 ms (500 ms if paced)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in QRS durationbaseline and 1 hour post infusionthe QRS waveform measurements will be calculated on the EKG prior to and after the procainamide infusion
changes in left ventricular volumes as measured via echocardiogrambaseline and 1 hour post infusionthe left ventricular volume will be calculated via echocardiogram pre and post procainamide infusion
changes in ejection fraction as measured via echocardiogrambaseline and 1hour post infusionejection fraction will be calculated via echocardiogram pre and post procainamide infusion.
changes in RV-LV electrical activation (in CRT patients)baseline and 1 hour post infusionThe RV-LV electrical activation will be assessed during the device interrogation pre and post procainamide infusion.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026