Skip to content

DDI (Effect of Metformin and Furosemide on Rosuvastatin PK)

The Effect of Different Doses of Metformin or Furosemide on Rosuvastatin Pharmacokinetics Following Oral Administration in Healthy Male Subjects (an Open-label, Randomised, Single-dose, Six-way Crossover Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02574845
Enrollment
18
Registered
2015-10-14
Start date
2015-10-12
Completion date
2015-12-14
Last updated
2023-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Brief summary

The primary objective of this trial is to investigate the relative bioavailability of rosuvastatin when given alone (Reference treatment, R) compared to when given together with one of the three different doses of metformin (10 mg, Test treatment 1 (T1); 50 mg (T2); 500 mg (T3)) or one of the two doses of furosemide (1 mg (T4); 5 mg (T5)).

Interventions

DRUGRosuvastatin
DRUGFurosemide

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Healthy male subjects according to the investigators assessment, based on a complete medical history including a physical examination, vital signs (BP, PR), 12-lead ECG, and clinical laboratory tests 2. Age of 18 to 55 years (incl.) 3. BMI of 18.5 to 29.9 kg/m2 (incl.) 4. Signed and dated written informed consent prior to admission to the study in accordance with GCP and local legislation

Exclusion criteria

1. Any finding in the medical examination (including BP, PR or ECG) is deviating from normal and judged as clinically relevant by the investigator 2. Repeated measurement of systolic blood pressure outside the range of 90 to 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure outside the range of 50 to 90 mmHg, or pulse rate outside the range of 45 to 90 bpm 3. Any laboratory value outside the reference range that the investigator considers to be of clinical relevance 4. Any evidence of a concomitant disease judged as clinically relevant by the investigator 5. Gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, respiratory, cardiovascular, metabolic, immunological or hormonal disorders 6. Cholecystectomy and/or surgery of the gastrointestinal tract that could interfere with the pharmacokinetics of the trial medication (except appendectomy and simple hernia repair) 7. Diseases of the central nervous system (including but not limited to any kind of seizures or stroke), and other relevant neurological or psychiatric disorders 8. History of relevant orthostatic hypotension, fainting spells, or blackouts 9. Chronic or relevant acute infections 10. History of relevant allergy or hypersensitivity (including allergy to the trial medication or its excipients) 11. Intake of drugs with a long half-life (more than 24 h) within 30 days or less than 10 half-lives of the respective drug prior to administration of trial medication 12. Within 10 days prior to administration of trial medication, use of drugs that might reasonably influence the results of the trial 13. Participation in another trial where an investigational drug has been administered within 60 days prior to planned administration of trial medication 14. Smoker (more than 10 cigarettes or 3 cigars or 3 pipes per day) 15. Inability to refrain from smoking on specified trial days 16. Alcohol abuse (consumption of more than 30 g per day) 17. Drug abuse or positive drug screening 18. Blood donation of more than 100 mL within 30 days prior to administration of trial medication or intended donation during the trial 19. Intention to perform excessive physical activities within one week prior to administration of trial medication or during the trial 20. Inability to comply with dietary regimen of trial site 21. Subject is assessed as unsuitable for inclusion by the investigator, for instance, because considered not able to understand and comply with study requirements, or has a condition that would not allow safe participation in the study In addition, the following trial-specific

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Area Under the Curve of Rosuvastatin From 0 to the Last Quantifiable Data Point (AUC0-tz)Blood sampling within 3 hours (h) prior to the study drug administration, at the time of administration (0:00) and 30 minutes, 1h, 1:30h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 24h, 34h, and 48h thereafter.This outcome measure presents the area under the concentration-time curve of rosuvastatin in plasma over the time interval from 0 to the last quantifiable data point (AUC0-tz).
Maximum Concentration of Rosuvastatin (Cmax)Blood sampling within 3 hours (h) prior to the study drug administration, at the time of administration (0:00) and 30 minutes, 1h, 1:30h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 24h, 34h, and 48h thereafter.This outcome measure presents the maximum measured concentration of rosuvastatin in plasma (Cmax).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Area Under the Curve of Rosuvastatin From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-∞)Blood sampling within 3 hours (h) prior to the study drug administration, at the time of administration (0:00) and 30 minutes, 1h, 1:30h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 24h, 34h, and 48h thereafter.This outcome measure presents area under the concentration-time curve of rosuvastatin in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞).

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All subjects were screened for eligibility to participate in the study. No run-in or wash-out period was conducted, since the trial was conducted in healthy subjects, that were not expected to take medications regularly. Actual number of subjects enrolled in fact represents randomized subjects due to the study set up.

Pre-assignment details

All subjects were screened for eligibility to participate in the trial. Subjects attended specialist sites which would then ensure that they (the subjects) met all strictly implemented inclusion/exclusion criteria. Subjects were not to be randomised to trial treatment if any one of the specific entry criteria were violated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment (T) 1-T3-Reference (REF)-T5-T2-T4
The subjects received test treatment 1 (T1) which is 10 milligram (mg) metformin hydrochloride (oral solution, brand name: MetfoLiquid GeriaSan) together with the reference treatment (REF) which is rosuvastatin (film-coated, brand name: Crestor) followed by test treatment 3 (T3) which is 500mg metformin hydrochloride together with REF followed by REF alone followed by test treatment 5 (T5) which is 5 mg furosemide (oral solution, brand name: Lasix liquidum) together with REF followed by test treatment 2 (T2) which is 50 mg of metformin hydrochloride together with REF followed by test treatment 4 (T4) which is 1mg of furosemide together with REF. Trial medication was administered as a single oral dose in the fasted state in each treatment period. The six single dose treatment periods were separated from each other by a wash-out period of at least 6 days between the drug administrations.
3
T2-REF-T4-T1-T5-T3
The subjects received T2, followed by REF alone, followed by T4, followed by T1, followed by T5 and followed by T3. Trial medication was administered as a single oral dose in the fasted state in each treatment period. The six single dose treatment periods were separated from each other by a wash-out period of at least 6 days between the drug administrations.
3
T3-T5-T1-T4-REF-T2
The subjects received T3, followed by T5, followed by T1, followed by T4, followed by REF alone and followed by T2. Trial medication was administered as a single oral dose in the fasted state in each treatment period. The six single dose treatment periods were separated from each other by a wash-out period of at least 6 days between the drug administrations.
3
T4-T2-T5-REF-T3-T1
The subjects received T4, followed by T2, followed by T5, followed by REF alone, followed by T3 and followed by T1. Trial medication was administered as a single oral dose in the fasted state in each treatment period. The six single dose treatment periods were separated from each other by a wash-out period of at least 6 days between the drug administrations.
3
T5-T4-T3-T2-T1-REF
The subjects received T5, followed by T4, followed by T3, followed by T2, followed by T1 and followed by REF alone. Trial medication was administered as a single oral dose in the fasted state in each treatment period. The six single dose treatment periods were separated from each other by a wash-out period of at least 6 days between the drug administrations.
3
REF-T1-T2-T3-T4-T5
The subjects received REF alone, followed by T1, followed by T2, followed by T3, followed by T4 and followed by T5. Trial medication was administered as a single oral dose in the fasted state in each treatment period. The six single dose treatment periods were separated from each other by a wash-out period of at least 6 days between the drug administrations.
3
Total18

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyAdverse Event010001
Overall StudyConsent withdrawn further participation000010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment (T) 1-T3-Reference (REF)-T5-T2-T4T2-REF-T4-T1-T5-T3T3-T5-T1-T4-REF-T2T4-T2-T5-REF-T3-T1T5-T4-T3-T2-T1-REFREF-T1-T2-T3-T4-T5Total
Age, Continuous28.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
33.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
39.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
32.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
22.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
37.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
31.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 164 / 152 / 172 / 153 / 152 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 160 / 150 / 170 / 150 / 150 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Area Under the Curve of Rosuvastatin From 0 to the Last Quantifiable Data Point (AUC0-tz)

This outcome measure presents the area under the concentration-time curve of rosuvastatin in plasma over the time interval from 0 to the last quantifiable data point (AUC0-tz).

Time frame: Blood sampling within 3 hours (h) prior to the study drug administration, at the time of administration (0:00) and 30 minutes, 1h, 1:30h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 24h, 34h, and 48h thereafter.

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter set (PKS) includes all randomised subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and provided at least one primary or secondary PK parameter that was not excluded from analysis due to non-evaluability or protocol violation relevant for the evaluation of the pharmacokinetics.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
REF AloneArea Under the Curve of Rosuvastatin From 0 to the Last Quantifiable Data Point (AUC0-tz)81.5 nanomol (nmol) * hour (h) / Litre (L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 50.9
Treatment 1Area Under the Curve of Rosuvastatin From 0 to the Last Quantifiable Data Point (AUC0-tz)87.8 nanomol (nmol) * hour (h) / Litre (L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 54.5
Treatment 2Area Under the Curve of Rosuvastatin From 0 to the Last Quantifiable Data Point (AUC0-tz)88.7 nanomol (nmol) * hour (h) / Litre (L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 62.4
Treatment 3Area Under the Curve of Rosuvastatin From 0 to the Last Quantifiable Data Point (AUC0-tz)126 nanomol (nmol) * hour (h) / Litre (L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 66.7
Treatment 4Area Under the Curve of Rosuvastatin From 0 to the Last Quantifiable Data Point (AUC0-tz)91.5 nanomol (nmol) * hour (h) / Litre (L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 55.4
Treatment 5Area Under the Curve of Rosuvastatin From 0 to the Last Quantifiable Data Point (AUC0-tz)97.2 nanomol (nmol) * hour (h) / Litre (L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.7
Comparison: This statistical analysis assess the effect of coadministration of 10 mg metformin hydrochloride on the primary outcome measure of the REF treatment.90% CI: [89.49, 116.15]ANOVA
Comparison: This statistical analysis assess the effect of coadministration of 50 mg metformin hydrochloride on the primary outcome measure of the REF treatment.90% CI: [96.12, 117.11]ANOVA
Comparison: This statistical analysis assess the effect of coadministration of 500 mg metformin hydrochloride on the primary outcome measure of the REF treatment.90% CI: [135.12, 171.41]ANOVA
Comparison: This statistical analysis assess the effect of coadministration of 1 mg furosemide on the primary outcome measure of the REF treatment.90% CI: [94.34, 121.3]ANOVA
Comparison: This statistical analysis assess the effect of coadministration of 5 mg furosemide on the primary outcome measure of the REF treatment.90% CI: [101.93, 131.82]ANOVA
Primary

Maximum Concentration of Rosuvastatin (Cmax)

This outcome measure presents the maximum measured concentration of rosuvastatin in plasma (Cmax).

Time frame: Blood sampling within 3 hours (h) prior to the study drug administration, at the time of administration (0:00) and 30 minutes, 1h, 1:30h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 24h, 34h, and 48h thereafter.

Population: PKS

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
REF AloneMaximum Concentration of Rosuvastatin (Cmax)9.04 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 52.4
Treatment 1Maximum Concentration of Rosuvastatin (Cmax)9.59 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 60.5
Treatment 2Maximum Concentration of Rosuvastatin (Cmax)9.94 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 69.4
Treatment 3Maximum Concentration of Rosuvastatin (Cmax)14.0 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 71.2
Treatment 4Maximum Concentration of Rosuvastatin (Cmax)9.90 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 62
Treatment 5Maximum Concentration of Rosuvastatin (Cmax)10.8 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 62.7
Comparison: This statistical analysis assess the effect of coadministration of 10 mg metformin hydrochloride on the primary outcome measure of the REF treatment.90% CI: [87.19, 120.42]ANOVA
Comparison: This statistical analysis assess the effect of coadministration of 50 mg metformin hydrochloride on the primary outcome measure of the REF treatment.90% CI: [92.54, 123.69]ANOVA
Comparison: This statistical analysis assess the effect of coadministration of 500 mg metformin hydrochloride on the primary outcome measure of the REF treatment.90% CI: [131.7, 180.24]ANOVA
Comparison: This statistical analysis assess the effect of coadministration of 1 mg furosemide on the primary outcome measure of the REF treatment.90% CI: [91.78, 124.3]ANOVA
Comparison: This statistical analysis assess the effect of coadministration of 5 mg furosemide on the primary outcome measure of the REF treatment.90% CI: [98.27, 141.65]ANOVA
Secondary

Area Under the Curve of Rosuvastatin From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-∞)

This outcome measure presents area under the concentration-time curve of rosuvastatin in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞).

Time frame: Blood sampling within 3 hours (h) prior to the study drug administration, at the time of administration (0:00) and 30 minutes, 1h, 1:30h, 2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 24h, 34h, and 48h thereafter.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
REF AloneArea Under the Curve of Rosuvastatin From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-∞)99.7 nmol*h/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39
Treatment 1Area Under the Curve of Rosuvastatin From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-∞)105 nmol*h/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 48
Treatment 2Area Under the Curve of Rosuvastatin From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-∞)102 nmol*h/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 55
Treatment 3Area Under the Curve of Rosuvastatin From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-∞)149 nmol*h/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 49.8
Treatment 4Area Under the Curve of Rosuvastatin From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-∞)108 nmol*h/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 47.9
Treatment 5Area Under the Curve of Rosuvastatin From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-∞)115 nmol*h/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42
Comparison: This statistical analysis assess the effect of coadministration of 10 mg metformin hydrochloride on the primary outcome measure of the REF treatment.90% CI: [89.23, 114.82]ANOVA
Comparison: This statistical analysis assess the effect of coadministration of 50 mg metformin hydrochloride on the primary outcome measure of the REF treatment.90% CI: [97.65, 117.81]ANOVA
Comparison: This statistical analysis assess the effect of coadministration of 500 mg metformin hydrochloride on the primary outcome measure of the REF treatment.90% CI: [135.21, 158.62]ANOVA
Comparison: This statistical analysis assess the effect of coadministration of 1 mg furosemide on the primary outcome measure of the REF treatment.90% CI: [92.2, 121]ANOVA
Comparison: This statistical analysis assess the effect of coadministration of 5 mg furosemide on the primary outcome measure of the REF treatment.90% CI: [106.75, 130.67]ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026