Skip to content

Cervical Ripening: A Comparison Between Intravaginal Misoprostol Tablet and Intracervical Foley's Catheter and Subsequent Induction of Labor, Safety and Efficacy in Federal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02574338
Enrollment
135
Registered
2015-10-12
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2018-08-31
Last updated
2019-10-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of Foley's catheter and misoprostol in cervical ripening.

Detailed description

This is a randomized clinical study which will be made up of two arms or groups. The first arm or group - 1 will have cervical ripening with intracervical extraamniotic Foley's catheter while group - 2 will have cervical ripening with intravaginal misoprostol. The parturients will be randomly selected by simple lottery and recruited into the two arms of the study. Each parturient will pick by simple lucky dip from a pool of folded papers with inscription group 1 or group 2 in a bag in a double blinded manner and will be recruited into the group picked among the two arms of the study. The Bishop's score of the cervix will be accurately determined and documented before cervical ripening. Bishop's score of ≥6 will be considered ripe. Oxytocin will be used for induction or augmentation of labor as required.

Interventions

intracervical extraamniotic Foley's catheter

DRUGprostaglandin E1 analogue

intravaginal misoprostol

Sponsors

Nwali Matthew Igwe
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Parturients who gave consent * has low bishop score (≤5) * term singleton cephalic presenting fetus * intact membranes * no contraindication to vaginal delivery

Exclusion criteria

* those who refused consent * preterm delivery * vaginal infection * non-cephalic presentation * multiple gestation * low lying placenta/previa, * vaginal bleeding, * previous cesarean section * rupture of membranes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Bishop Score of 6 or more24 hours

Countries

Nigeria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026