Skip to content

Clobetasol Propionate Versus Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser for the Treatment of Lichen Sclerosus

A Randomized Trial of Clobetasol Propionate Versus Fractionated CO2 Laser for the Treatment of Lichen Sclerosus (CuRLS)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02573883
Acronym
CuRLS
Enrollment
52
Registered
2015-10-12
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2019-09-30
Last updated
2021-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus

Keywords

Vulva, Lichen Sclerosus, Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser, Mona Lisa Laser, Clobetasol Propionate, Vulvodynia

Brief summary

This study is being done to compare the effects, good and bad, of fractionated CO2 laser treatment and clobetasol propionate .05% ointment on vulvar lichen sclerosus.

Detailed description

Vulvar lichen sclerosus (LS) is a well-characterized dermatosis resulting in labial atrophy, synechiae and introital narrowing and can often cause dyspareunia, itching and co-existent vulvar pain. Biopsy is necessary to confirm the clinical diagnosis and the mainstay of treatment usually consists of topical steroid therapy (Chi). Clobetasol propionate and mometasone furoate are potent topical steroids that have long been considered gold-standard treatment for vulvar lichen sclerosus and work through anti-inflammatory, anti-mitotic, and immunosuppressive effects. One of the complications of long-term steroid use, however, is potential thinning of the vulvar skin, therefore limiting long-term use. Clobetasol propionate has a range of efficacy from 61-91% depending on the selected outcome criteria. The vulvovaginal SmartXide -V2-LR laser system by DEKA (Calezano, Italy) is a fractionated C02 laser with maximum 40 Watt power and laser energy emission at 10,600 nanometer wavelength which is mainly absorbed by water in the underlying tissue (Salvatore). The SmartXide-V2-LR system was first introduced in 2009 with DOT therapy distributing fractioned CO2 laser in small spots of 200 microns to the vulvar skin or vaginal epithelium, resulting in a portion of the skin remaining intact with less tissue destruction and faster healing (Salvatore). The device is cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for incision, excision, ablation, and coagulation of gynecologic soft tissues. The fractioned therapy has been shown to stimulate fibroblastic growth through activation and biosynthesis of collagen and restoration of the extracellular matrix with collagen fibers. Very little is known about long-term effects of fractionated C02 laser therapy use in the vulva or vagina, although the treatment is widely accepted in plastic and cosmetic surgery and dermatology. Increased marketing for laser vaginal rejuvenation has spawned a proprietary female genital cosmetic surgery industry in the US with very limited published outcome data. SmartXide -V2-LR has some established outcome data for treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), also known as vulvovaginal atrophy (Salvatore). The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of clobetasol propionate .05% ointment to fractionated CO2 laser procedure for the treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus. Women presenting to the urogynecology clinic will be screened for lichen sclerosus. Vulvar biopsy will be performed for confirmation, and, if eligible, the patient will be consented to undergo baseline questionnaires, photodocumentation of vulvar lesions and randomization. A minimum of 2 weeks are required from the time of biopsy to treatment. Patient will be randomized to monthly LASER treatment for 3 months or topical STEROID therapy (clobetasol propionate .05% ointment nightly for one month then three times weekly for 2 additional months) in a 1:1 ratio using a computer generated randomization schedule. Because of the nature of the treatment, it will not be possible to blind patients but the assessor will be blinded to the intervention. Patients may have used clobetasol propionate in past, but must complete 8 week wash out period. Patient questionnaires include multiple validated scales and surveys to provided reproducible measures of vulvar symptoms as primary and secondary outcomes. Questionnaires will be completed at the intake visit, repeated at 6 month and one year follow up. The investigators expect improved subjective and objective results in the LASER group at 6 months compared with the STEROID group. At 6 months, participants are giving the option to crossover to receive the other treatment arm if desired due to continued symptoms. All groups are followed to 12 months for comparison. Sample size calculations were conducted using the absolute change in the Skindex 29 as the primary end point. Out study will reach 80% power to detect a mean difference of 16 points on the Skindex 29 (sd=22 for both groups) between the study groups with 25 patients in each group, or 50 in total based on a one-sided two-sample t-test with alpha=0.05 (He). By accounting for 10% attrition, the investigators propose to recruit 56 patients to the study to be randomized with a 1:1 ratio to each group, with a blocked component for those who used tropical clobetasol in the past. Data will be entered into a secure RedCAPS Database which provides complete auditing for data management processes. De-identified backup data will be kept in locked files at the participating site. Plans for publication will be handled by the investigators at MedStar Washington Hospital Center and will adhere to publication policies. All personnel with access to data collected have completed the Program for Ethics Education in Research training with the appropriate HIPAA certification. Patients will not be compensated for travel and may be accountable for some medical bills for office visits. Study location is Medstar Lafayette Office 1133 21st St NW, Washington, DC 20036.

Interventions

Vulvar lichen sclerosis will be treated except for the clitoris glans and clitoral hood which will be spared with at least 5mm margin. The procedure will be performed in the outpatient clinic at the National Center for Advanced Pelvic Surgery at MedStar Washington Hospital Center Lafayette Office, 1133 21st St NW, Washington, DC 20036, and include 3 sessions, 4 weeks apart.

Topical Steroid therapy (Clobetasol propionate .05% ointment nightly for one month then three times weekly for 2 additional months) for a total of three months of treatment.

Sponsors

Medstar Health Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Biopsy proven symptomatic vulvar lichen sclerosus * Ability to understand the study, accept randomization and logistically follow-up with scheduled visits * English Speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Known vulvar malignancy * Pregnancy or planning pregnancy or less than 3 months postpartum * Premenopausal * Current or prior diagnosis of any gynecologic malignancy * Previous pelvic radiation therapy * Allergy to topical steroid * Active Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), vulvar infection (candida, herpes, bacterial vaginosis, trichomoniasis or other infection) * Pelvic organ prolapse \> than Stage 2 * Treatment with systemic immunomodulators, topical calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, pimecrolimus), or vaginal hormonal or vulvar topical steroid use within 2 months of enrollment * History of transvaginal mesh implant (excluding sling or sacrocolpopexy mesh) * IUD (Intrauterine Device) * Skindex-29 overall score \<21, below mildly impaired health related quality of life threshold

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in SkinDEX-29 ScoreChange from baseline score to score at six monthsThe Skindex-29 is a validated questionnaire for assessing acute dermatologic symptoms over a 4-week period. The Skindex-29 is a 29 question version of the original SkinDEX questionnaire. Total numeric score is reported ranging from 0-100. Scores reported as a change between six months and baseline with more negative scores indicating greater improvement in symptoms (better outcome).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Considered Satisfied as Assessed by Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) ScoreSix months from treatmentPatient global impression of satisfaction total score on visual analog scale (very satisfied or satisfied) ranging from 1-5 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
Change Vaginal Health Index (VHI) ScoreBaseline to 6 months after treatmentThe Vaginal Health Index is a five item scale with scores ranging from 5-25 with lower scores indicating greater urogenital atrophy. The change in VHI is express with more negative scores indicating greater improvement between study time points.
Change Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreBaseline to 6 months after treatmentPatient subjective scale of symptoms of Lichen Sclerosus. Each item scaled 0-10 with greater severity of symptoms indicated by higher score. Results expressed as change with more negative values indicating greater improvement.
Change in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)Baseline to six monthsSubjective measure of vulvar symptoms of itching, burning, dyspareunia of Lichen Sclerosus. VSQ is a 21-item instrument and scores range from 0 to 20 with increased scores indicating increased vulvovaginal symptom bother. The change in VSQ is reported with more negative scores indicating greater improvement.
Change Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleBaseline to Six months from treatmentProvider scored objective appearance of vulvar Lichen Sclerosus. Each item scaled 0-10 with greater severity of appearance indicated by higher score. Results expressed as change with more negative values indicating greater improvement.
Number of Patients With Adverse OutcomesSix Month to One Year from treatmentTotal number for adverse outcomes (of any severity) to include description of pain, infection, de novo or worsening dyspareunia, contact dermatitis and burns from treatment
Change SkinDEX-29 ScoreSix months to one year from treatmentThe Skindex-29 is a validated questionnaire for assessing acute dermatologic symptoms over a 4-week period. The Skindex-29 is a 29 question version of the original SkinDEX questionnaire. Total numeric score is reported ranging from 0-100. Scores reported as a change between six months and baseline with more negative scores indicating greater improvement.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited from urogynecologic and gynecology academic center office visits with vulvar biopsy-proven lichen sclerosus. Patients underwent block randomization with a 1:1 ratios, with stratification for participants based on prior clobetasol use. Participates stayed in randomized group until six months when they had the option to crossover into other treatment group and receive that treatment or continue to 12 months with current treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser
Patients with biopsy proven lichen sclerosus previously treated with clobetasol propionate Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser: Vulvar lichen sclerosis will be treated except for the clitoris glans and clitoral hood which will be spared with at least 5mm margin. The procedure will be performed in the outpatient clinic at the National Center for Advanced Pelvic Surgery at MedStar Washington Hospital Center Lafayette Office, 1133 21st St NW, Washington, DC 20036, and include 3 sessions, 4 weeks apart.
27
Clobetasol Propionate
Clobetasol Propionate 0.05% ointment Topical Steroid therapy (Clobetasol propionate .05% ointment nightly for one month then three times weekly for 2 additional months) for a total of three months of treatment
25
Total52

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
One Year Follow UpLost to Follow-up2100
Six Month Follow UpLost to Follow-up1000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserClobetasol PropionateTotal
Age, Continuous67.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
64.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
Prior Clobetasol Exposure14 Participants11 Participants25 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
23 Participants17 Participants40 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
27 participants25 participants52 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants25 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 270 / 240 / 110 / 100 / 110 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 271 / 240 / 110 / 100 / 110 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 270 / 240 / 110 / 100 / 110 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Change in SkinDEX-29 Score

The Skindex-29 is a validated questionnaire for assessing acute dermatologic symptoms over a 4-week period. The Skindex-29 is a 29 question version of the original SkinDEX questionnaire. Total numeric score is reported ranging from 0-100. Scores reported as a change between six months and baseline with more negative scores indicating greater improvement in symptoms (better outcome).

Time frame: Change from baseline score to score at six months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange in SkinDEX-29 Score-16.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.09
Clobetasol PropionateChange in SkinDEX-29 Score-5.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.81
p-value: 0.007t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)

Subjective measure of vulvar symptoms of itching, burning, dyspareunia of Lichen Sclerosus. VSQ is a 21-item instrument and scores range from 0 to 20 with increased scores indicating increased vulvovaginal symptom bother. The change in VSQ is reported with more negative scores indicating greater improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to six months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)-3.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.12
Clobetasol PropionateChange in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)-0.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.11
p-value: 0.014t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)

Subjective measure of vulvar symptoms of itching, burning, dyspareunia of Lichen Sclerosus. VSQ is a 21-item instrument and scores range from 0 to 20 with increased scores indicating increased vulvovaginal symptom bother. The change in VSQ is reported with more negative scores indicating greater improvement.

Time frame: Six month to one year after treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)0.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.43
Clobetasol PropionateChange in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)-1.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.66
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)-2.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.98
Secondary

Change Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog Scale

Provider scored objective appearance of vulvar Lichen Sclerosus. Each item scaled 0-10 with greater severity of appearance indicated by higher score. Results expressed as change with more negative values indicating greater improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to Six months from treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleCigarette Paper-2.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.92
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleFusion of Labia Minora-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScalePerianal Involvement-0.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.49
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScalePhimosis-1.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleIntroital Narrowing-1.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.82
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleFissure-2.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleLoss of Labial Minora-0.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleErosion-2.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleWhite Plaque-1.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleErosion-0.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.88
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleWhite Plaque-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleCigarette Paper-1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleIntroital Narrowing-0.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScalePerianal Involvement-1.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.35
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleLoss of Labial Minora-0.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.26
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleFusion of Labia Minora0.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.92
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScalePhimosis0.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.04
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleFissure-1.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
Secondary

Change Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog Scale

Provider scored objective appearance of vulvar Lichen Sclerosus. Each item scaled 0-10 with greater severity of appearance indicated by higher score. Results expressed as change with more negative values indicating greater improvement.

Time frame: Six months to One Year from treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScalePhimosis1.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleFusion of Labia Minora0.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.54
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleErosion1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScalePerianal Involvement-0.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.07
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleIntroital Narrowing0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleCigarette Paper0.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleFissure0.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleLoss of Labial Minora0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleWhite Plaque-0.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.29
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleLoss of Labial Minora-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.69
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScalePhimosis-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.69
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleFusion of Labia Minora-0.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleCigarette Paper0.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleWhite Plaque-1.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.49
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleIntroital Narrowing0.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleErosion0.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleFissure0.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Clobetasol PropionateChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScalePerianal Involvement0.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleLoss of Labial Minora0.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleWhite Plaque-0.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.24
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleCigarette Paper-0.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.81
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleIntroital Narrowing-0.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScalePerianal Involvement0.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleFusion of Labia Minora-1.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.59
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScalePhimosis-0.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleFissure-0.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleErosion-0.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScalePhimosis0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScalePerianal Involvement-1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleIntroital Narrowing-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleErosion-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleFissure-1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.32
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleCigarette Paper-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleFusion of Labia Minora-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleLoss of Labial Minora1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange Objective Provider VAS Visual Analog ScaleWhite Plaque-0.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
Secondary

Change SkinDEX-29 Score

The Skindex-29 is a validated questionnaire for assessing acute dermatologic symptoms over a 4-week period. The Skindex-29 is a 29 question version of the original SkinDEX questionnaire. Total numeric score is reported ranging from 0-100. Scores reported as a change between six months and baseline with more negative scores indicating greater improvement.

Time frame: Six months to one year from treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange SkinDEX-29 Score-0.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.94
Clobetasol PropionateChange SkinDEX-29 Score-7.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.13
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange SkinDEX-29 Score-10.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.53
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange SkinDEX-29 Score-1.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Secondary

Change Vaginal Health Index (VHI) Score

The Vaginal Health Index is a five item scale with scores ranging from 5-25 with lower scores indicating greater urogenital atrophy. The change in VHI is express with more negative scores indicating greater improvement between study time points.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 months after treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Vaginal Health Index (VHI) Score1.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.34
Clobetasol PropionateChange Vaginal Health Index (VHI) Score-0.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.62
p-value: 0.46t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change Vaginal Health Index (VHI) Score

The Vaginal Health Index is a five item scale with scores ranging from 5-25 with lower scores indicating greater urogenital atrophy. The change in VHI is express with more negative scores indicating greater improvement between study time points.

Time frame: Six month to one year after treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Vaginal Health Index (VHI) Score-2.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.37
Clobetasol PropionateChange Vaginal Health Index (VHI) Score1.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.45
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange Vaginal Health Index (VHI) Score1.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange Vaginal Health Index (VHI) Score1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Secondary

Change Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

Patient subjective scale of symptoms of Lichen Sclerosus. Each item scaled 0-10 with greater severity of symptoms indicated by higher score. Results expressed as change with more negative values indicating greater improvement in symptoms (better outcome).

Time frame: Six months to one year after treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreItching-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.76
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreDysuria-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.77
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreTearing of vulvar skin-0.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreBurning-0.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.43
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScorePainful defecation0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.21
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreIrritation or tearing-0.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.03
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScorePain with sex-1.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.26
Clobetasol PropionateChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreDysuria-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.97
Clobetasol PropionateChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScorePain with sex0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Clobetasol PropionateChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreIrritation or tearing-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.54
Clobetasol PropionateChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreTearing of vulvar skin-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
Clobetasol PropionateChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScorePainful defecation-0.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.98
Clobetasol PropionateChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreBurning-1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.87
Clobetasol PropionateChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreItching-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.03
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScorePain with sex-1.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.25
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreItching-1.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.06
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreBurning-0.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.45
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreIrritation or tearing-1.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.69
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreTearing of vulvar skin-2.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.14
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreDysuria-1.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScorePainful defecation-0.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.38
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreIrritation or tearing0.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.71
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScorePainful defecation-0.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.36
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreDysuria-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreBurning-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreItching0.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.76
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreTearing of vulvar skin-0.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.99
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScorePain with sex-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Secondary

Change Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

Patient subjective scale of symptoms of Lichen Sclerosus. Each item scaled 0-10 with greater severity of symptoms indicated by higher score. Results expressed as change with more negative values indicating greater improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 months after treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreIrritation-4.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.04
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreTearing of vulvar skin-1.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.55
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreBurning-2.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.76
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreDysuria-2.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.47
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScorePain with sex-0.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.95
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScorePain defecation-1.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreItching-3.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.75
Clobetasol PropionateChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScorePain defecation-0.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
Clobetasol PropionateChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreItching-1.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
Clobetasol PropionateChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreBurning-1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.21
Clobetasol PropionateChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreIrritation-1.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.84
Clobetasol PropionateChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScorePain with sex-0.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.35
Clobetasol PropionateChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreTearing of vulvar skin-1.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.07
Clobetasol PropionateChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreDysuria-0.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.37
Secondary

Number of Participants Considered Satisfied as Assessed by Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Score

Patient global impression of satisfaction total score on visual analog scale (very satisfied or satisfied) ranging from 1-5 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

Time frame: Six months from treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserNumber of Participants Considered Satisfied as Assessed by Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Score21 Participants
Clobetasol PropionateNumber of Participants Considered Satisfied as Assessed by Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Score9 Participants
p-value: 0.011Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants Considered Satisfied as Assessed by Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Score

Patient global impression of satisfaction total score on visual analog scale (very satisfied or satisfied) ranging from 1-5 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

Time frame: 1 year from treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserNumber of Participants Considered Satisfied as Assessed by Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Score14 Participants
Clobetasol PropionateNumber of Participants Considered Satisfied as Assessed by Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Score4 Participants
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverNumber of Participants Considered Satisfied as Assessed by Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Score9 Participants
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverNumber of Participants Considered Satisfied as Assessed by Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Score10 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Adverse Outcomes

Total number for adverse outcomes (of any severity) to include description of pain, infection, de novo or worsening dyspareunia, contact dermatitis and burns from treatment

Time frame: Six Month to One Year from treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserNumber of Patients With Adverse Outcomes0 Participants
Clobetasol PropionateNumber of Patients With Adverse Outcomes0 Participants
Clobetasol Propionate to Laser CrossoverNumber of Patients With Adverse Outcomes0 Participants
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol CrossoverNumber of Patients With Adverse Outcomes0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Adverse Outcomes

Total number for adverse outcomes (of any severity) to include description of pain, infection, de novo or worsening dyspareunia, contact dermatitis and burns from treatment.

Time frame: 12 Weeks to Six months from treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserNumber of Patients With Adverse Outcomes0 Participants
Clobetasol PropionateNumber of Patients With Adverse Outcomes0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Adverse Outcomes

Total number for adverse outcomes (of any severity) to include description of pain, infection, de novo or worsening dyspareunia, contact dermatitis and burns from treatment.

Time frame: 12 Weeks from treatment

Population: Please see adverse events section for description of adverse events.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide LaserNumber of Patients With Adverse Outcomes1 Participants
Clobetasol PropionateNumber of Patients With Adverse Outcomes1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026