Skip to content

The Effects Upon the Bladder of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

The Effects Upon the Bladder of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02573402
Enrollment
19
Registered
2015-10-09
Start date
2016-07-12
Completion date
2017-10-27
Last updated
2018-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injury, Neurogenic Bladder

Keywords

electric stimulation, urodynamic study

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the effects upon the bladder of electric stimulation of the leg's tibial nerve in people with acute spinal cord injury with an intervention called transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS).

Detailed description

In this study, TTNS will be used to help neurogenic bladder in SCI. First, acute SCI subjects which respond to TTNS will be identified as seen on urodynamic studies (USD). Then, responders will be invited to participate in a randomized control trial of a 2-week protocol of TTNS to test for safety and efficacy during inpatient rehabilitation to evaluate bladder changes based upon pre- and post- urodynamic testing, as well as 2-month follow-up.

Interventions

10 sessions over a 2 week period of TTNS for 30 minutes. Electrodes will be placed 2 inch by 4 inch according to anatomic landmarks, with the negative electrode behind the internal malleolus and the positive electrode 10cm superior to the negative electrode, verified with rhythmic flexion of the toes secondary to stimulation of the flexor digitorum and hallicus brevis. Current intensity may vary from patient to patient and will be documented and used in the analysis.

DEVICEControl

10 sessions over a 2 week period of TTNS sham stimulation for 30 minutes. Electrodes will be placed 2 inch by 4 inch according to anatomic landmarks, with the negative electrode behind the internal malleolus and the positive electrode 10cm superior to the negative electrode. Current intensity will be set to zero.

Sponsors

The Institute for Rehabilitation and Research (TIRR)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Baylor College of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Case Western Reserve University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Houston
CollaboratorOTHER
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Enrollment within 6 weeks of injury * Neurologic level rostral to T10 (T9 and above). This is a significant neurologic level because the bladder remains innervated at these levels, without damage to the nerve cell bodies of the bladder within the spinal cord. * Location and transportation available for follow-up appointments

Exclusion criteria

* History of peripheral neuropathy or premorbid symptoms of peripheral neuropathy * Known etiologies that may cause peripheral neuropathy (i.e. diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, autoimmune diseases, alcoholism, hx of chemotherapy, etc.) * History of genitourinary diagnoses (i.e. prostate hypertrophy, overactive bladder, cancer, etc.) * Pregnancy * History of central nervous system disorder (i.e. prior SCI, stroke, brain injury, Parkinson's disease, MS, etc.) * Morbid obesity * Ventilator dependent respiration * Significant autonomic dysreflexia during baseline urodynamic study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Infectionabout 4 weeksAll infections were urinary tract infections (UTIs).
Number of Participants With Skin Irritationabout 4 weeksNumber of participants with skin irritation, which includes cellulitis, burn, or pressure injury. The one instance of skin irritation was pressure injury.
Number of Participants Who Were Unexpectedly Discharged to an Acute Care Hospitalabout 4 weeks
Mean Change in Pain Score as Indicated by Numeric Pain Scale (NPS)baseline, about 30 minutesParticipants received 30 minutes of TTNS (or sham stimulation) on each of 10 days over a 16-day period, and on each of the 10 days, pain was recorded immediately before stimulation (baseline) and at about 30 minutes later at the end of stimulation. For a single subject's mean change in pain score: \[Average of the post-stimulation measurements for all 10 time points\] minus \[Average of baseline measurements for all 10 time points time point\] = \[mean change in pain score\]. The value reported is the mean of all participants' mean change in pain score. The range of possible pain scores on the numeric pain scale is 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating higher level of pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Maximum Detrusor Pressure as Evaluated by Urodynamic Studybaseline
Maximum Bladder Capacity as Evaluated by Urodynamic Studybaseline

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (TTNS) applied to subjects for 2-week protocol. Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation: 10 sessions over a 2 week period of TTNS for 30 minutes. Electrodes will be placed 2 inch by 4 inch according to anatomic landmarks, with the negative electrode behind the internal malleolus and the positive electrode 10cm superior to the negative electrode, verified with rhythmic flexion of the toes secondary to stimulation of the flexor digitorum and hallicus brevis. Current intensity may vary from patient to patient and will be documented and used in the analysis.
12
Control
Control (Sham stimulation). Control: 10 sessions over a 2 week period of TTNS sham stimulation for 30 minutes. Electrodes will be placed 2 inch by 4 inch according to anatomic landmarks, with the negative electrode behind the internal malleolus and the positive electrode 10cm superior to the negative electrode. Current intensity will be set to zero.
7
Total19

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTranscutaneous Tibial Nerve StimulationControlTotal
Admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM) bladder item1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
Admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM) cognition subscale27.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
29.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
28.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
Admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor subscale16.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
16.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
16.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
Age, Continuous36.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
48.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
40.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grade B2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grade C2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grade D0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Neurologic Level Number7.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
8.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
7.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
Number of Days from Injury20.8 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
19.9 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
20.5 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Number of Participants with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A8 Participants3 Participants11 Participants
Number of Participants with Tetraplegia6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 Participants7 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants2 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 123 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change in Pain Score as Indicated by Numeric Pain Scale (NPS)

Participants received 30 minutes of TTNS (or sham stimulation) on each of 10 days over a 16-day period, and on each of the 10 days, pain was recorded immediately before stimulation (baseline) and at about 30 minutes later at the end of stimulation. For a single subject's mean change in pain score: \[Average of the post-stimulation measurements for all 10 time points\] minus \[Average of baseline measurements for all 10 time points time point\] = \[mean change in pain score\]. The value reported is the mean of all participants' mean change in pain score. The range of possible pain scores on the numeric pain scale is 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating higher level of pain.

Time frame: baseline, about 30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve StimulationMean Change in Pain Score as Indicated by Numeric Pain Scale (NPS)-0.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
ControlMean Change in Pain Score as Indicated by Numeric Pain Scale (NPS)-0.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.13
Primary

Number of Participants Who Were Unexpectedly Discharged to an Acute Care Hospital

Time frame: about 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve StimulationNumber of Participants Who Were Unexpectedly Discharged to an Acute Care Hospital0 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants Who Were Unexpectedly Discharged to an Acute Care Hospital0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Infection

All infections were urinary tract infections (UTIs).

Time frame: about 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve StimulationNumber of Participants With Infection4 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Infection3 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Skin Irritation

Number of participants with skin irritation, which includes cellulitis, burn, or pressure injury. The one instance of skin irritation was pressure injury.

Time frame: about 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve StimulationNumber of Participants With Skin Irritation0 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Skin Irritation1 Participants
Secondary

Maximum Bladder Capacity as Evaluated by Urodynamic Study

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: One subject declined to repeat the post-TTNS urodynamic study, leaving 11 remaining in the TTNS group for the urodynamic measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve StimulationMaximum Bladder Capacity as Evaluated by Urodynamic Study552.6 mLStandard Deviation 110
ControlMaximum Bladder Capacity as Evaluated by Urodynamic Study459.6 mLStandard Deviation 156.4
Secondary

Maximum Bladder Capacity as Evaluated by Urodynamic Study

Time frame: baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve StimulationMaximum Bladder Capacity as Evaluated by Urodynamic Study580 mLStandard Deviation 45.7
ControlMaximum Bladder Capacity as Evaluated by Urodynamic Study571 mLStandard Deviation 81.3
Secondary

Maximum Detrusor Pressure as Evaluated by Urodynamic Study

Time frame: baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve StimulationMaximum Detrusor Pressure as Evaluated by Urodynamic Study30.6 cm H2OStandard Deviation 21
ControlMaximum Detrusor Pressure as Evaluated by Urodynamic Study33 cm H2OStandard Deviation 11.1
Secondary

Maximum Detrusor Pressure as Evaluated by Urodynamic Study

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: One subject declined to repeat the post-TTNS urodynamic study, leaving 11 remaining in the TTNS group for the urodynamic measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve StimulationMaximum Detrusor Pressure as Evaluated by Urodynamic Study38.1 cm H2OStandard Deviation 21.4
ControlMaximum Detrusor Pressure as Evaluated by Urodynamic Study44.4 cm H2OStandard Deviation 21.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026