Skip to content

Gut Microbiome and p-Inulin in Hemodialysis

A Multi-center Study to Characterize the Gut Microbiome of Individuals With End-stage Renal Disease Treated With Maintenance Hemodialysis, and to Explore Effects of P-inulin on the Gut Microbiome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02572882
Enrollment
13
Registered
2015-10-09
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2019-01-31
Last updated
2022-10-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

End-Stage Renal Disease, Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis

Keywords

hemodialysis, p-inulin, gut microbiome

Brief summary

The Microbiome trial is a non-randomized, open-label, sequential, multi-center study of p-inulin for patients with hemodialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease.

Detailed description

This primary objective of this exploratory study is to characterize the safety and tolerability of p-inulin (Prebiotin®, provided by JGI Medical) in altering the composition and function of the human gut microbiome, thereby reducing the generation of gut-derived uremic toxins, improving gut barrier function and attenuating systemic inflammation in patients treated with maintenance hemodialysis. The study also aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a full-scale trial of p-inulin. The primary efficacy parameters of the trial will be intra- and inter-participant variability in gut metabolites and bacterial composition. Secondary parameters of interest include tolerability and safety of p-inulin, willingness of hemodialysis patients to enroll in a study requiring repeated collection of stool samples, and participant adherence to agent treatment and specimen collection schedules.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTp-inulin

12 week self-administered treatment phase

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
Brigham and Women's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
George Washington University
CollaboratorOTHER
Vanderbilt University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Washington
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a sequential trial that included three sequential phases: 1. Pre-treatment phase: 8 weeks during which no treatment was administered 2. p-Inulin phase: 12 weeks during which p-inulin was administered 8g orally twice daily 3. Post-treatment phase: 8 weeks during which no treatment was administered. Eleven of the 13 participants in the p-inulin phase entered the post-treatment phase. The other two withdrew prior to the post-treatment phase.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Maintenance hemodialysis therapy for end-stage renal disease * At least 18 years of age * At least 90 days since hemodialysis initiation * Self-reported average stool frequency of at least 1 every other day * For women of childbearing potential, willingness to use a highly effective method of birth control for up to 4 weeks after the last dose of p-inulin. * Ability to provide consent

Exclusion criteria

* Use of prebiotics or probiotics during the past 8 weeks * Consumption of probiotic yogurt during the past 2 weeks * Use of antibiotics within the past 8 weeks * Presence of HIV infection, chronic wound infection, osteomyelitis, or current hemodialysis * Inflammatory bowel disease, chronic diarrhea, current C. difficile infection * Cirrhosis or chronic active hepatitis * Anticipated kidney transplantation, change to peritoneal dialysis, or transfer to another dialysis unit within 9 months * Expected survival less than 9 months * Pregnancy, anticipated pregnancy, or breastfeeding * Incarceration * Participation in another intervention study * Severe anemia defined as hemoglobin \<9.0 g/dl within the past 4 weeks as documented in the dialysis unit patient record

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Within Participant Variability in Microbiome Composition by Treatment Phase28 weeksThe weighted UniFrac distance was used to compute the distances for each sample. Weighted UniFrac distance uses species abundance information and weights the branch length with abundance difference. Weighted UniFrac distance is most sensitive to detect change in abundant lineages since it uses absolute abundance difference in its definition.
Within Participant Variability in Stool Metabolome by Treatment Phase28 weeksThe Euclidean distance was used to compute the distances for each sample. The Euclidean distance is defined as the distance between two points. Differences between samples were determined on the basis of distances from the initial measurements to account for participant-level differences in initial abundance of microorganisms.
Within Participant Variability in Plasma Metabolome by Treatment Phase28 weeks (8 weeks pre-treatment, 12 weeks of treatment, 8 weeks post-treatment)The Euclidean distance was used to compute the distances for each sample. The Euclidean distance is defined as the distance between two points. Differences between samples were determined on the basis of distances from the initial measurements to account for participant-level differences in initial abundance of microorganisms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety Outcome)28 weeks-Adverse events per participant related to treatment as coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Coding System
Number of Serious Adverse Events (Safety Outcome)28 weeksSerious adverse events categorized by body systems, related to treatment as coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Coding System
Rate of Enrollment Refusal (Feasibility Outcome)1 yearEnrollment refusal rate
Change in Score of Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) (Safety Outcome)GSRS was assessed at Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 28.Gastrointestinal symptoms as measure by the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). The GSRS total score is the sum of 15 0-3 items where 0 indicates absence and 3 an extreme degree of the symptom. A higher score indicates worse outcome. The minimum score is 0, the maximum score is 45.
Blood Specimen Collection Proportion - Protocol Adherence (Feasibility Outcome)28 weeksProportion of completed blood sample collections
Adherence Rate of P-inulin Use (Feasibility Outcome)12 weeksProportion of p-inulin packets used
Rate of Study Withdrawal (Feasibility Outcome)28 weeksNumber of withdrawals during each phase of the study
Stool Specimen Collection Proportion - Protocol Adherence (Feasibility Outcome)28 weeksPercent of expected completed protocol-specified stool sample collections
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Use of P-inulin (Tolerability Outcome)12 weeks-Early discontinuation of p-inulin
Number of Participants Who Reduce the Dose of P-inulin (Tolerability Outcome)12 weeks-Reduction in p-inulin dose

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The protocol allowed for enrollment of up to 20 individuals with the goal or having 10 participants complete the first 20 weeks of the study with satisfactory completeness of biosample collection.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
This is a sequential study in which participants are observed (no intervention) for 8 weeks (pre-treatment), then participants self-administer p-inulin 8g orally twice daily for 12 weeks (treatment phase), and then observed for a final 8 weeks during which no treatment was administered (post-treatment).
13
Total13

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyParticipant received kidney transplant1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants
Age, Continuous48.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 110 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 132 / 110 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 130 / 111 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Within Participant Variability in Microbiome Composition by Treatment Phase

The weighted UniFrac distance was used to compute the distances for each sample. Weighted UniFrac distance uses species abundance information and weights the branch length with abundance difference. Weighted UniFrac distance is most sensitive to detect change in abundant lineages since it uses absolute abundance difference in its definition.

Time frame: 28 weeks

Population: Two participants withdrew at the beginning of the second phase of the trial. One participant with antibiotic use was not included in the microbiome composition analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Full Study CohortWithin Participant Variability in Microbiome Composition by Treatment Phasetreatment0.175 weighted unifrac distrance
Full Study CohortWithin Participant Variability in Microbiome Composition by Treatment Phasepost-treatment0.210 weighted unifrac distrance
Full Study CohortWithin Participant Variability in Microbiome Composition by Treatment Phasepre-treatment0.165 weighted unifrac distrance
Primary

Within Participant Variability in Plasma Metabolome by Treatment Phase

The Euclidean distance was used to compute the distances for each sample. The Euclidean distance is defined as the distance between two points. Differences between samples were determined on the basis of distances from the initial measurements to account for participant-level differences in initial abundance of microorganisms.

Time frame: 28 weeks (8 weeks pre-treatment, 12 weeks of treatment, 8 weeks post-treatment)

Population: Two participants withdrew at the beginning of the second phase of the trial. One participant with antibiotic use was not included in the microbiome composition analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Full Study CohortWithin Participant Variability in Plasma Metabolome by Treatment Phasepre-treatment9.48 Euclidean distance
Full Study CohortWithin Participant Variability in Plasma Metabolome by Treatment Phasetreatment9.47 Euclidean distance
Full Study CohortWithin Participant Variability in Plasma Metabolome by Treatment Phasepost-treatment9.72 Euclidean distance
Primary

Within Participant Variability in Stool Metabolome by Treatment Phase

The Euclidean distance was used to compute the distances for each sample. The Euclidean distance is defined as the distance between two points. Differences between samples were determined on the basis of distances from the initial measurements to account for participant-level differences in initial abundance of microorganisms.

Time frame: 28 weeks

Population: Two participants withdrew at the beginning of the second phase of the trial. One participant with antibiotic use was not included in the microbiome composition analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Full Study CohortWithin Participant Variability in Stool Metabolome by Treatment Phasepre-treatment14.49 Euclidean distance
Full Study CohortWithin Participant Variability in Stool Metabolome by Treatment Phasetreatment15.70 Euclidean distance
Full Study CohortWithin Participant Variability in Stool Metabolome by Treatment Phasepost-treatment16.77 Euclidean distance
Secondary

Adherence Rate of P-inulin Use (Feasibility Outcome)

Proportion of p-inulin packets used

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: This is a sequential trial. The 13 participants from the pre-treatment phase moved to the p-inulin phase. Eleven of the 13 participants entered the post-treatment phase. Two participants withdrew prior to the post-treatment phase.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Full Study CohortAdherence Rate of P-inulin Use (Feasibility Outcome)0 percent
Week 4Adherence Rate of P-inulin Use (Feasibility Outcome)89.5 percent
Week 8Adherence Rate of P-inulin Use (Feasibility Outcome)0 percent
Secondary

Blood Specimen Collection Proportion - Protocol Adherence (Feasibility Outcome)

Proportion of completed blood sample collections

Time frame: 28 weeks

Population: This is a sequential trial. The 13 participants from the pre-treatment phase moved to the p-inulin phase. Eleven of the 13 participants entered the post-treatment phase. Two participants withdrew prior to the post-treatment phase.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Full Study CohortBlood Specimen Collection Proportion - Protocol Adherence (Feasibility Outcome)99 percentage of expected
Week 4Blood Specimen Collection Proportion - Protocol Adherence (Feasibility Outcome)100 percentage of expected
Week 8Blood Specimen Collection Proportion - Protocol Adherence (Feasibility Outcome)94 percentage of expected
Secondary

Change in Score of Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) (Safety Outcome)

Gastrointestinal symptoms as measure by the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). The GSRS total score is the sum of 15 0-3 items where 0 indicates absence and 3 an extreme degree of the symptom. A higher score indicates worse outcome. The minimum score is 0, the maximum score is 45.

Time frame: GSRS was assessed at Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 28.

Population: Two participants withdrew at the beginning of the second phase of the trial.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Full Study CohortChange in Score of Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) (Safety Outcome)5.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.35
Week 4Change in Score of Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) (Safety Outcome)6.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.65
Week 8Change in Score of Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) (Safety Outcome)3.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.36
Week 12Change in Score of Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) (Safety Outcome)4.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.75
Week 16Change in Score of Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) (Safety Outcome)6.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.47
Week 20Change in Score of Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) (Safety Outcome)5.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.37
Week 24Change in Score of Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) (Safety Outcome)3.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
Week 28Change in Score of Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) (Safety Outcome)3.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.59
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Use of P-inulin (Tolerability Outcome)

-Early discontinuation of p-inulin

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: This outcome is only relevant during the p-inulin phase.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Full Study CohortNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Use of P-inulin (Tolerability Outcome)0 Participants
Week 4Number of Participants Who Discontinued Use of P-inulin (Tolerability Outcome)0 Participants
Week 8Number of Participants Who Discontinued Use of P-inulin (Tolerability Outcome)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Reduce the Dose of P-inulin (Tolerability Outcome)

-Reduction in p-inulin dose

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Three participants reduced their p-inulin dose. This analysis only applies to the 12 week treatment arm.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Full Study CohortNumber of Participants Who Reduce the Dose of P-inulin (Tolerability Outcome)0 Participants
Week 4Number of Participants Who Reduce the Dose of P-inulin (Tolerability Outcome)3 Participants
Week 8Number of Participants Who Reduce the Dose of P-inulin (Tolerability Outcome)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety Outcome)

-Adverse events per participant related to treatment as coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Coding System

Time frame: 28 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Full Study CohortNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety Outcome)1 participants
Week 4Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety Outcome)2 participants
Week 8Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety Outcome)0 participants
Secondary

Number of Serious Adverse Events (Safety Outcome)

Serious adverse events categorized by body systems, related to treatment as coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Coding System

Time frame: 28 weeks

Population: This is a sequential trial. The 13 participants from the pre-treatment phase moved to the p-inulin phase. Eleven of the 13 participants entered the post-treatment phase. Two participants withdrew prior to the post-treatment phase.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Full Study CohortNumber of Serious Adverse Events (Safety Outcome)3 Serious Adverse Events
Week 4Number of Serious Adverse Events (Safety Outcome)0 Serious Adverse Events
Week 8Number of Serious Adverse Events (Safety Outcome)1 Serious Adverse Events
Secondary

Rate of Enrollment Refusal (Feasibility Outcome)

Enrollment refusal rate

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Data not collected

Secondary

Rate of Study Withdrawal (Feasibility Outcome)

Number of withdrawals during each phase of the study

Time frame: 28 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Full Study CohortRate of Study Withdrawal (Feasibility Outcome)0 Participants
Week 4Rate of Study Withdrawal (Feasibility Outcome)2 Participants
Week 8Rate of Study Withdrawal (Feasibility Outcome)0 Participants
Secondary

Stool Specimen Collection Proportion - Protocol Adherence (Feasibility Outcome)

Percent of expected completed protocol-specified stool sample collections

Time frame: 28 weeks

Population: This is a sequential trial. The 13 participants from the pre-treatment phase moved to the p-inulin phase. Eleven of the 13 participants entered the post-treatment phase. Two participants withdrew prior to the post-treatment arm.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Full Study CohortStool Specimen Collection Proportion - Protocol Adherence (Feasibility Outcome)97 percentage of expected
Week 4Stool Specimen Collection Proportion - Protocol Adherence (Feasibility Outcome)100 percentage of expected
Week 8Stool Specimen Collection Proportion - Protocol Adherence (Feasibility Outcome)97 percentage of expected

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026