Skip to content

Comparison of Smart-Shear Wave Elastography and Transient Elastography

Applicability, Reliability and Accuracy for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis: Comparison of Smart-Shear Wave Elastography and Transient Elastography

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02569567
Acronym
SMART
Enrollment
105
Registered
2015-10-07
Start date
2015-11-30
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2015-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibrosis, Liver

Keywords

Smart-Shear Wave(SSW), Transient Elastography(TE), Liver cirrhosis

Brief summary

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the applicability and diagnostic performances of Smart-Shear wave(SSW) imaging, in comparison with Transient elastography(TE) for the staging of liver fibrosis using pathologic results as the reference standard.

Interventions

PROCEDURESmart-Shear Wave(SSW) imaging

1. All Smart-Shear Wave(SSW) imaging examinations will be performed by one operator. 2. The right lobe of the liver is examined through the intercostal view with the patient lying in a supine or semi-decubitus position with the right arm in maximal abduction. 3. Once the optimal sizes of the regions of interest is chosen, they are fixed for subsequent measurement in each subject. Special attention is paid to avoid any focal lesion, vessels, biliary tracts, or artifacts from nearby lung gas or cardiac movement.

PROCEDURETransient elastography(TE)

1. Using the M probe in patients with BMI \<30 kg/m2. 2. Liver measurement is taken at either the seventh or eighth intercostal space of each subject over the right lobe of the liver. The measuring depth ranges from 2.5 to 6.5 cm below the skin surface. 3. Examinations are performed by a sonographer blinded to S-shear wave elastography, and biological results.

Sponsors

Asan Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with liver disease: plan to undergo liver surgery 2. Potential liver donors 3. Smart-Shear wave & transient elastography were performed within one month from liver surgery 4. Aged between 20 to 80 years 5. Compliance with scheduled visits, evaluation plans and other study procedures

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous history of hepatic surgery 2. Previous history of transarterial chemoembolization 3. Huge or infiltrative tumor in the right lobe of the liver 4. Bile duct dilatation in the right lobe of the liver 5. Older than 80 years 6. The opinion of the investigator would make the patient unsuitable for enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Non-inferiority of Smart-Shear Wave(SSW) imaging compared to Transient elastography(TE) in diagnosis for hepatic fibrosis.1 yearApplicability rate between Smart-Shear Wave(SSW) and Transient elastography(TE) will be compared to prove non-inferiority. Applicability rate = {\[Total cases- (failure cases + non-reliable measurement cases)\]/total case} \* 100 (%)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy to predict the degree of hepatic fibrosis.1 yearAreas under the receiver operating curve (AUROCs) of the two techniques will be compared to estimate the probability of correctly predicting the degree of hepatic fibrosis. Substantial discordance between US elastography techniques and histologic staging will also be explored. It is defined as a difference in fibrosis stage by at least 2 points.
The correlation between two US elastography techniques1 yearThe correlation between the two US elastography techniques will be tested using the Spearman's correlation coefficient.
Reliability of Smart-Shear Wave(SSW) comparing diagnostic performance according to the reliable measurement index(RMI) results1 yearReliable measurement index (RMI) is an reliability index that computes the reliability of the calculated stiffness by analyzing the changes in shapes of propagated shear waves. The diagnostic performance of Smart-Shear wave will be assessed by comparing the RMI result.
Precision of Smart-Shear Wave(SSW)1 yearPrecision of Smart-Shear Wave(SSW) will be assessed using the composite factors, including intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), within subject SD(wSD), repeatability coefficient(RC), and within subject CV(wCV).

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactSo Yeon Kim, Dr
sykim.radiology@gmail.com82-2-3010-5980
Backup ContactSo Hyun Park, Dr
nnoleeter@naver.com82-2-3010-1497

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026