Skip to content

Effect of PEEP and Trendelenburg on Ultrasound Size of Internal Jugular and Subclavian Veins

Effect of PEEP and Trendelenburg on Ultrasound Size of Internal Jugular and Subclavian Veins: A Cross-over Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02569424
Acronym
PEEPUS
Enrollment
42
Registered
2015-10-06
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2016-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Management of the Expiratory End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) and Body Position, Ventilated Patient in Intensive Care

Keywords

PEEP level, Trendelenburg position, cross-sectional area of the jugular and subclavian veins, central venous catheter

Brief summary

There is no recommendation for the management of the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during setting of a central venous catheter (CVC) in a ventilated patient. Several non-randomized studies have investigated the cross-sectional area (AST) ultrasound minor axis for different pressure levels by evaluating a single vessel every time or by not displaying the right or left side in the evaluation. Another study showed that there could be unpredictable size differences between the 2 subclavian veins. In ventilated patient, the PEEP, which is intrathoracic, will result in a decrease of venous return and thus possibly a superior vena cava dilation, located outside the pleura, depending on their capacitance. Different pressure levels showed an increase of AST with the increase of intra-thoracic pressure on certain veins, in a heterogeneous and not randomized manner. The primary purpose of the study is to measure the effect of PEEP (0, 5, 10 or 15 cm H2O) and the patient's position (supine or Trendelenburg strict -15-20 °) on the cross-sectional area of the jugular and subclavian veins.

Detailed description

There is no recommendation for the management of the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during setting of a central venous catheter (CVC) in a ventilated patient. Several non-randomized studies have investigated the cross-sectional area (AST) ultrasound minor axis for different pressure levels by evaluating a single vessel every time or by not displaying the right or left side in the evaluation. Another study showed that there could be unpredictable size differences between the 2 subclavian veins. In ventilated patient, the PEEP, which is intrathoracic, will result in a decrease of venous return and thus possibly a superior vena cava dilation, located outside the pleura, depending on their capacitance. Different pressure levels showed an increase of AST with the increase of intra-thoracic pressure on certain veins, in a heterogeneous and not randomized manner. The primary purpose of the study is to measure the effect of PEEP (0, 5, 10 or 15 cm H2O) and the patient's position (supine or Trendelenburg strict -15-20 °) on the cross-sectional area of the jugular and subclavian veins.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPatient's position

Supine or Trendelenburg strict -20°)

Sponsors

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any patient ventilated in intensive care is eligible. * Age ≥ 18 years * Patient with stable hemodynamic status and Mean Blood Pressure (\< 65 mmHg) * Patient with registered social security number

Exclusion criteria

* clinical sign for a central venous thrombosis (unilateral edema ...).during echography screening before inclusion * presence of a central line for more than 48 hours. * Anechoic patient (checked during echography screening) * History of cervical spine surgery. * IntraCranial HyperTension * patient in shock with hemodynamic instability and not stabilized * patient treated by noradrenaline \> 1 µg/kg/min * patient or relative's refusal * protected patients ≥ 18 years, minors, pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The cross-sectional area of the jugular veins ( in cm2)at baselineThe cross-sectional area of the jugular veins ( in cm2) at the end of the intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The cross-sectional area of the subclavian veins ( in cm2)at baselineThe cross-sectional area of the subclavian veins ( in cm2) at the end of the intervention
The antero-posterior diameter of the jugular veins (in mm)at baselineThe antero-posterior diameter of the jugular veins (in mm) at the end of the intervention
The antero-posterior diameter of the subclavian veins (in mm)at baselineThe antero-posterior diameter of the subclavian veins (in mm) at the end of the intervention
The distance between posterior and pleural lining of the jugular veins (in mm)at baselineThe distance between posterior and pleural lining of the jugular veins (in mm) at the end of the intervention
The distance between posterior and pleural lining of the subclavian veins (in mm)at baselineThe distance between posterior and pleural lining of the subclavian veins (in mm) at the end of the intervention

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026