Skip to content

Effect of Robot-assisted Gait Training on Brain Reorganization in Hemiplegic Patients

Effect of Robot-assisted Gait Training on Brain Reorganization in Hemiplegic Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02569190
Enrollment
10
Registered
2015-10-06
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2016-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of robotic gait therapy for brain reorganization in hemiplegia patients.

Detailed description

This study designed an interventional pre-post compared clinical study. The subjects received conventional physical therapy with Walkbot training (3 sessions per week for 7 weeks, 20 session). Before and after intervention all subjects evaluated using diffusion tensor imaging and clinical outcome measurements.

Interventions

DEVICEWalkbot

Robot assisted gait training

Sponsors

Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* First stroke attack * Within 3 months after stroke onset * Supratentorial stroke * Unilateral stroke

Exclusion criteria

* Bilateral stroke * infratentorial stroke * Cognitive disabilities or serious psychiatric illness. * Difficulty in walking due to orthopedic problems.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline fraction anisotropy of corticoreticular tract in Diffusion tensor imaging 8 weeks after the first day of interventionat the first day of intervention and 8 weeks after the first day

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional ambulation categoryat the first day of intervention, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after the first dayThe functional ambulation category was designed to examine the levels of assistance required during a 15m walk. Six categories are included in the functional ambulation category: 0 (non-ambulatory), 1 (needs continuous support from one person), 2 (needs intermittent support from one person), 3 (needs only verbal supervision), 4 (help is required on stairs and uneven surfaces), and 5 (can walk independently anywhere).
Fugl-meyer assessmentat the first day of intervention, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after the first day
Medical research councilat the first day of intervention, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after the first dayThe medical research council was designed to examine the muscle strength. Six categories are included in the medical research council: 5 (muscle contracts normally against full resistance), 4 (muscle strength is reduced but muscle contraction can still move joint against resistance), 3 (muscle strength is further reduced such that the joint can be moved only against gravity with the examiner's resistance completely removed. As an example, the elbow can be moved from full extension to full flexion starting with the arm hanging down at the side), 2 (muscle can move only if the resistance of gravity is removed. As an example, the elbow can be fully flexed only if the arm is maintained in a horizontal plane), 1 (only a trace or flicker of movement is seen or felt in the muscle or fasciculations are observed in the muscle) and 0 (no movement is observed)
Trunk control testat the first day of intervention, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after the first day

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026