Skip to content

Stem Cell Transplantation From HLA Partially-Matched Related Donors for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

A Two Step Approach to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation From HLA Partially-Matched Related Donors for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02566395
Enrollment
10
Registered
2015-10-02
Start date
2014-12-31
Completion date
2022-02-14
Last updated
2022-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Hodgkin Lymphoma

Keywords

Stem Cell Transplantation, Haploidentical Donors

Brief summary

This clinical pilot trial is intended to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-mismatched related donors for children and young adults with hematologic malignancies who lack a suitably matched related or unrelated donor. The methodology will be one that has been successfully utilized in adult patients at Thomas Jefferson University.

Detailed description

Allogeneic HSCT is a potentially curative therapy for a number of malignancies. A barrier to the institution of this potentially curative strategy in hematologic malignancies is the availability of donors. Only 30% of patients in North America or Europe who may benefit from allogeneic HSCT will have an available HLA matched sibling donor. The ability to find a matched sibling donor is proportional to the number of children in the family. Because of the decreasing size of nuclear families, it is becoming less likely for patients to have an HLA identical matched sibling. Registries can provide a matched unrelated allogeneic stem cell graft for an additional 30% of patients. However this is not an option for patients who do not have a match in the registry, or whose disease status precludes them from waiting to identify an appropriate unrelated donor. The ability of finding a well matched unrelated donor is even more limited for segments of the population with mixed race ancestry as well as for African Americans who, because of a higher degree of HLA diversity, will be unlikely to find an unrelated donor who matches their HLA type. In these settings it is easier and faster to identify a partially HLA-matched (or haploidentical) family member as a stem cell donor. The use of haploidentical donors broadens the application of HSCT because it is not as limited by family size or racial/ethnic HLA diversity. Because parents and children, as well as siblings can be used as haploidentical donors, this type of transplant enfranchises almost every segment of the population. Since, in this study, the donor lymphoid and stem cell portions of the graft are collected and administered at different time points during the conditioning regimen, this approach to haploidentical HSCT is referred to as a 2 Step regimen. The approach does not involve ex vivo T cell depletion, but uses cyclophosphamide to tolerize donor lymphocytes within the framework of a myeloablative conditioning regimen. Preliminary experience with this approach in adult patients at Thomas Jefferson University for myeloablative haploidentical HSCT dates back to 2005 with the first trial using myeloablative conditioning formally launched in 2006. That initial trial met its accrual goals and the current trial is one of the successor trials derived from that experience. The conditioning regimen includes total body irradiation (TBI) (1.5 Gray x 8) and CY (60 mg/kg x 2). Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) are used as post-transplant immunosuppression in relatively standard fashion. The novel aspect of the regimen is in the administration of the graft. If one considers that a standard allograft consists of two components, a lymphoid portion and a stem cell portion, what is unique here is the administration of these two portions separately, at different time points during the conditioning regimen rather than together. The lymphoid portion, including a fixed dose of CD3+ cells/kg is administered prior to cyclophosphamide while the hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) portion of the graft is administered after cyclophosphamide has been metabolized and eliminated. Thus, the transplant occurs in 2 steps.

Interventions

RADIATIONRadiation

1,200 cGy, delivered in 8 fractions of 150 cGy bid x 4 days

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg IV daily x 2 consecutive days

DLI containing 1 x 10E8/kg donor T-cells

2-10 x 10E6/kg donor CD34+ selected cells

Sponsors

New York Blood Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Northwell Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Acute lymphoblastic leukemia * Acue myelogenous leukemia * Myelodysplastic syndrome * Non-Hodgkin lymphoma * Chronic myelogenous leukemia * Adequate lung, liver, renal, cardiac function * Performance status \>70 * Available related donor who is mismatched at ≥ 2 HLA alleles

Exclusion criteria

* Available HLA-identical related donor * HIV positive * Active uncontrolled infection * Pregnancy * Performance status ≤70

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hematopoietic engraftmentDay +30 post-transplantationAbsolute neutrophil count \>500/microliter x 3 consecutive days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
2-Year disease-free survival2 years post-transplantationAlive and free of disease at 2 years post-transplantation
Grade II-IV GvHDDay +100 post-transplantatationProportion of subjects with Grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease
Grade III-IV GvHDDay +100 post-transplantationProportion of subjects with Grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease
Relapse rate2 years post-transplantationProportion of subjects who have experienced disease relapse by 2 years post-transplantation

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026