FindTrial
Sign In

Study Comparing Pursestring Wound Closure vs Conventional Closure to Reverse Stoma of Colorectal Cancer Patients

Randomized Clinical Trial of Stoma Reversal Comparing Pursestring Wound Closure vs Conventional Closure to Eliminate the VSS Score of the Scar for Colorectal Cancer Patients

Status
NO_LONGER_AVAILABLE
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Expanded Access
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02564224
Acronym
PURSE
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2015-09-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer, Stoma Closure Technic

Brief summary

Temporary stomas has been performed to reduce complications after colorectal cancer surgery, especially in high-risk anastomosis. Different closure technics showed different outcome. The aim of this study is to compare the scar length , surgical site infection and pain score of purse-string wound closure vs conventional closure.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPursestring Wound Closure

Procedure: Pursestring Wound Closure

PROCEDUREConventional Wound Closure

Procedure: Conventional Wound Closure

DEVICEprolene

Sponsors

Zhejiang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Receiving temporary ostomy because of colorectal cancer at least 3 months ago; * Age of≥18 and ≤80

Exclusion criteria

* Not willing or incapable to comply with all study visits and assessments * Evidence of any other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding or laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that puts the patient at high risk for treatment-related complications

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026