Skip to content

Changes To The Abdominal Wall After DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

Structural Changes In The Abdominal Wall After Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02563977
Enrollment
14
Registered
2015-09-30
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2016-05-31
Last updated
2020-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abdominal Wall Morbidity, Breast Reconstruction

Keywords

Breast reconstruction, Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, Abdominal wall morbidity, Plastic and reconstructive surgery

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to perform an evaluation of the structural changes in the abdominal wall after harvesting a DIEP flap in breast reconstruction. 14 women undergoing secondary, unilateral breast reconstruction were recruited to the study and underwent a 2 year postoperative CT scan of the abdomen (without contrast). Structural changes were assessed by comparing the abdominal CT scans performed prior to surgery with the 2 year postoperative CT scans.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study was to perform an evaluation of the structural changes in the abdominal wall after harvesting a DIEP flap in breast reconstruction. 14 women undergoing secondary, unilateral breast reconstruction were recruited to the study and underwent a 2 year postoperative CT scan of the abdomen (without contrast). Structural changes were assessed by comparing the abdominal CT scans performed prior to surgery with the 2 year postoperative CT scans. The following structural changes were evaluated at four specific levels of the abdomen by two radiologists (among the authors): 1) rectus diastasis, 2) thickness and width of the rectus muscles, 3) thickness of the adipose tissue, 4) hernias (in the zone between the xiphoid process and the symphysis). The measurement levels chosen were: 1) 7 cm below the xiphoid process, 2) umbilicus level, 3) central zone (between level 2 and 4), 4) 5 cm above the symphysis Statistical analysis were performed to see if the structural measurements were significantly different comparing preoperative CT versus 2 year postoperative CT.

Interventions

DEVICE2 year postop CT scan of the abdomen

CT scan of the abdomen (from the xiphoid process to the symphysis) performed approximately two years after performed DIEP flap breast reconstruction. No contrast used. Low dose of radiation.

Sponsors

Oslo University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Secondary, unilateral breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap * All smokers stopped smoking 4 weeks prior to surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Metastatic disease * Bilateral breast reconstruction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Structural measurements of the abdominal wall evaluated on CT scans2 year postoperative after performed DIEP flap breast reconstruction

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026