Skip to content

Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Third Trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy Analgesia : a Randomized Study. (PCEA-IMG)

Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Third Trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy Analgesia : a Randomized Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02563821
Acronym
PCEA-IMG
Enrollment
37
Registered
2015-09-30
Start date
2015-11-05
Completion date
2018-12-11
Last updated
2019-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Epidural

Keywords

Termination of pregancy, Third trimester, Programmed intermittent epidural bolus, Continuous epidural infusion, Epidural analgesia, Legally induced abortion

Brief summary

Background : Recently, delivery of local anaesthetics via Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus (PIEB) has been shown to improve labour epidural analgesia compared to delivery via Continuous Epidural Infusion (CEI). Purpose : However, the superiority of PIEB compared to CEI has not been investigated for third trimester voluntary termination of pregnancy. We hypothesized that PIEB administration would result in a better degree of satisfaction of the patients compared with CEI for third trimester legally induced abortion analgesia.

Detailed description

Abstract : The recent technical advances in antenatal diagnosis have led to an increase number of legally induced abortion at the third trimester of pregnancy. Psychological pain is frequently associated to physical pain in these kinds of interventions. So anaesthetists are more and more involved in voluntary termination of pregnancy analgesia. In France, Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) with CEI mode is usually used for voluntary termination of pregnancy analgesia. But recent studies have shown that PIEB mode as compared to CEI mode increases maternal satisfaction during labour. This may be attributed to a more extensive spread of epidural solution when delivered as a bolus rather than continuous infusion. Few trials have been interested in investigating the best mode of PCEA for legally induced abortion analgesia. This study includes women who undergo voluntary third semester termination of pregnancy. Patients are randomized to PIEB or CEI for pain analgesia. In this randomized, double-blind study, the investigators assess the degree of satisfaction of the patients (primary outcome), the incidence of motor block, total drug consumption and adverse events (secondary outcomes) between the two study groups. The different values are collected during the intervention on a specific paper for each patient and the degree of satisfaction is reported on this paper just before the patient leaves the birth room (approximatively 2 hours after the expulsion).

Interventions

DRUGclonidine
PROCEDUREPatient Controlled Epidural Analgesia for third trimester termination of preganancy analgesia
DRUGLevobupivacaine
DRUGsufentanil

Sponsors

University Hospital, Limoges
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age ≥ 18 years * ASA 1 or 2 (healthy women) * pregnancy at third trimester * willingness of voluntary interrupt the pregnancy * women affiliated to french health social system * written informed consent from every patient

Exclusion criteria

* contraindications to epidural analgesia * opioids consumption within the last 24 hours * patient's unwillingness * inability to comprehend or comply with the procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
satisfaction visual analog scale (SVAS) measurmentprocedureThe degree of satisfaction is assessed using a satisfaction visual analog scale (SVAS) where 0 corresponded to completely unsatisfied and 100 to completely satisfied .

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number and intensity of motor blockprocedureIncidence of motor block determined by number and intensity
Number of call of the aneshetist for insufficient analgesiaprocedureNumber of call of the aneshetist for insufficient analgesia
Number of doses of complementary manual bolusprocedureNumber of doses of complementary manual bolus administered
Obstetrical informationsproceduretime of the intervention, doses of oxytocin and prostin used, instrumental delivery
Numbers of Adverse eventsprocedureNumbers of Adverse events (Pruritus, nausea / vomitings, episodes of arterial low blood pressure)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026