Skip to content

Impact of Anticipated Regret Incorporation Into Patient Decision Aids

Impact of Anticipated Regret on Decision-Making in Preference Sensitive Care for Breast and Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02563808
Enrollment
189
Registered
2015-09-30
Start date
2013-03-31
Completion date
2014-02-28
Last updated
2023-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Regret

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of incorporating anticipated regret into standard patient decision aids. Participants in the Wharton Behavioral Lab will be administered a standard patient decision aid and an anticipated regret augmented decision aid. Participants will complete a computerized survey about their experiences with each version, and their answers will be assessed for potential differences associated with the incorporation of Anticipated Regret.

Detailed description

Participants will be recruited through the Wharton Behavioral Lab. Upon arrival males will be provided with two decision aids focusing on prostate cancer, while females will be provided with two decision aids focusing on early breast cancer. One of these decision aids will be a standard version, and one of these will be the anticipated regret-augmented version. Participants will be randomized to which version they receive first to minimize the effect of presentation order. After reviewing the materials, participants will immediately complete a computerized survey at their work stations that will ask them to answer questions based on the materials presented as well as how any hypothetical treatment decisions they would be asked to make would have been influenced by them. Because these are healthy subjects participating in a hypothetical decision-making process for sole purpose of research, the intervention can neither be categorized as experimental or as the standard of care.

Interventions

OTHERStandard Decision Aid

Females will receive standard decisions aid for early stage breast cancer.

OTHERPost-surgical Regret Decision Aid

Females will receive anticipated regret-augmented version for early breast cancer.

Sponsors

University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy females ages 18 years or older

Exclusion criteria

* Under age 18 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Consideration of Regret11 monthsCompare decisions about a hypothetical surgery for breast cancer, and examined whether regret is a consideration in treatment decisions between those who received the experimental and those who received the standard version of the decision aid. The values represent numbers of participants who reported that regret played a role in their decision-making.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Survey: Standard Version
Females will receive standard decisions aid for early stage breast cancer. Survey: Standard
94
Survey: Anticipated Regret Version
Females will receive anticipated regret-augmented version for early breast cancer. Survey: Regret
88
Total182

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSurvey: Standard VersionSurvey: Anticipated Regret VersionTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
94 Participants88 Participants182 Participants
Age, Continuous22.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
21.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
22.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
82 Participants72 Participants154 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
33 Participants35 Participants68 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
19 Participants13 Participants32 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
30 Participants24 Participants54 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
94 Participants88 Participants182 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
94 Participants88 Participants182 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 940 / 88
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 960 / 88

Outcome results

Primary

Difference in Consideration of Regret

Compare decisions about a hypothetical surgery for breast cancer, and examined whether regret is a consideration in treatment decisions between those who received the experimental and those who received the standard version of the decision aid. The values represent numbers of participants who reported that regret played a role in their decision-making.

Time frame: 11 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Survey: Standard VersionDifference in Consideration of Regret62 participants reported regret played role
Survey: Anticipated Regret VersionDifference in Consideration of Regret69 participants reported regret played role

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026