Skip to content

Protexa® Versus TiLoopBra® in Immediate Breast Reconstruction- A Pilot Study

Protexa® Versus TiLoopBra® in Immediate Breast Reconstruction- A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02562170
Enrollment
50
Registered
2015-09-29
Start date
2013-07-31
Completion date
2015-05-31
Last updated
2015-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome

Keywords

breast, reconstruction, mesh, acellular dermal matrix

Brief summary

Randomized controlled trial to look at early complications, cosmetic outcome, patient satisfaction and thickness of the tissue overlying the implant at the lower pole in immediate implant based breast reconstruction after Skin or Nipple Sparing Mastectomy with either a mesh (TiLOOP Bra) or an ADM (Protexa). Multicenter austrian trial with four breast cancer centers, 50 patients randomized 1:1 in the TiLoop or Protexa group.

Interventions

DEVICEProtexa

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* breast cancer patients with indication for skin or nipple sparing mastectomy * BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with indication for skin or nipple sparing mastectomy

Exclusion criteria

* prior local radiotherapy * inflammatory breast cancer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
complicationsup to two weeks after surgeryhematoma, seroma, infection, skin necrosis, capsular contracture, implant loss
change of baseline patient quality of life after 3 and 6 monthsup to two weeks after surgery (=baseline), 3 and 6 months after surgeryquestionnaire
change of baseline cosmetic outcome after 3 and 6 monthsup to two weeks after surgery (=baseline), 3 and 6 months after surgeryfour point Harris Scale (1=poor, 4=excellent)
change of baseline thickness of the tissue overlying the implant at the lower pole after 3 and 6 monthsup to two weeks after surgery (=baseline), 3 and 6 months after surgeryThe thickness of the tissue covering the implant in the lower pole im mm measured by ultrasound

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026