Skip to content

SEALANT-DK: Longevity and Efficacy of 6 Resin Sealants Used for Sealing Permanent Teeth in Children and Adolescents

SEALANT-DK: Longevity and Efficacy of 6 Resin Sealants Used for Sealing Permanent Teeth in Children and Adolescents

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02561689
Acronym
SEALANT-DK
Enrollment
248
Registered
2015-09-28
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2021-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Keywords

Occlusal caries, Resin fissure sealant, Longevity, Effectiveness

Brief summary

Background: Occlusal caries is the main reason for restorative therapy in the young permanent dentition, but restorations have limited survival time and may also weaken the tooth. An intact fissure sealing is an effective preventive treatment of occlusal caries lesions and may be used therapeutically to arrest the caries progression. However, the major challenge with fissure sealants is the frequent need for re-treatments, mostly due to inadequate retention. Purpose: To quantify the longevity and effectiveness of the 6 resin sealants used prophylactically and therapeutically in permanent molar teeth. Study design: The study is carried out as a prospective, clinically controlled study with split-mouth design, where each of the 60 dentists/dental hygienists from 13 municipalities in Denmark uses 2 of the 6 sealants. The treatments are examined clinically and radiologically after 1, 2, 3, and 5 years.

Detailed description

The choice of the two materials is randomized and carried out so that all materials are used equally frequent and with an even distribution between dentists and dental hygienists.

Interventions

Procedure: * The included teeth of the participating patients will in any case be sealed, but in this study, the operator is not free to choose the material, the material choice is determined by randomisation * Standardized radiographs (bitewings) will be taken before treatment and after 1, 2, 3 years and possibly after 5 years. Baseline radiograph can be taken up to six months before treatment. If using conventional radiography, double-film packs will be used. A maximum of 8/10 bitewings will be taken during the study period of 3/5 years * The occlusal surface is sealed by the dentist or dental hygienist. * Clinical evaluation of the quality of sealants and the need for re-treatments during the follow-up will be performed after 1, 2 and 3 years and possibly after 5 years

Sponsors

University of Copenhagen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Children and adolescents 5-14 years of age * Children with 2, 4, 6 or 8 molars assessed to be in need of prophylactic or therapeutic sealing * The radiographic penetration of the occlusal caries lesion must be limited halfway through the dentin

Exclusion criteria

* In case the occlusal surface is restored with communication between the restoration and the included lesion * Subjects with chronic diseases that could affect their caries pattern * Pain in teeth

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Longevity of 6 resin fissure sealants assessed by defined scoring system5 yearsClinical scoring system: 1: Intact sealing (success), 2: Partly loss of sealant (failure); 3: Total loss of sealant (failure)
Efficacy of 6 resin fissure sealants assessed by defined radiological scoring system5 yearsRadiographic scoring system: 1:Regression in depth of lesion (success), 2: Unchanged depth of lesion (success); 3: Progression in depth of lesion (failure)

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026