Skip to content

Comparison of Bleeding Risk Between Rivaroxaban and Apixaban: The Pilot Study

Comparison of Bleeding Risk Between Rivaroxaban and Apixaban for the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism: The Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02559856
Acronym
COBRRA Pilot
Enrollment
72
Registered
2015-09-24
Start date
2016-05-31
Completion date
2018-02-28
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Venous Thromboembolism

Brief summary

This vanguard pilot study compares rivaroxaban and apixaban, two of the new oral blood thinners for the treatment of blood clots. Half of the patients will receive apixaban and half will receive rivaroxaban. The main objective is to determine the feasibility of patient recruitment and resources required to follow enrolled patients and inform for a larger, multi-centered trial and to assess which one is safer.

Detailed description

Recently developed new oral anticoagulants (OAC) overcome some of the limitations of established therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), due to ease of administration and more predictable pharmacokinetic properties. Many clinical questions about the new OAC remain unanswered because there have not been direct head-to-head comparison trials. For example, although studies have shown that rivaroxaban and apixaban are at least as effective and safe as LMWH and VKA, meta-analyses suggest that apixaban may be associated with lower bleeding risk. Concerns about the potential impact of medication non-adherence have been raised. Compliance with twice daily medications (e.g. apixaban) is often worse than once daily medications (e.g. rivaroxaban). Both of these medications are approved by Health Canada for treatment of VTE yet there is genuine uncertainty about which of the two direct OAC confer the best risk-to-benefit ratio.This is a multi-centre, prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) trial assessing clinical feasibility for a larger multi-centered trial comparing bleeding outcomes using apixaban vs. rivaroxaban for treatment of acute VTE. The primary objective of the study is to determine if it is feasible to conduct a large randomized multicenter trial comparing apixaban vs. rivaroxaban for the treatment of acute VTE. The secondary objectives are to assess safety and superiority of apixaban vs rivaroxaban.

Interventions

DRUGApixaban
DRUGRivaroxaban

Sponsors

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Canadian Venous Thromboembolism Clinical Trials and Outcomes Research (CanVECTOR) Network
CollaboratorNETWORK
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed newly diagnosed acute VTE (proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis and segmental or greater pulmonary embolism) * Age ≥ 18 years old * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Any contraindication for anticoagulation such as active bleeding * Clinically significant liver disease or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels ≥ 3 times the upper limit of normal range * Creatinine clearance \< 30 ml/min calculated with the Cockcroft-Gault formula (29) * Known allergies to either apixaban or rivaroxaban * Pregnancy * Use of contraindicated medications with apixaban or rivaroxaban * Active malignancy in the last 6 months (excluding localized skin malignancy) * No private insurance coverage for the study drug or not willing to pay for study drug

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients screened who are eligible to participate in the trialFor the duration of the study 3-6 monthsAssessing clinical feasibility for a larger multi-center trial - number of screened patients versus eligible patients
Proportion of eligible patients who consent to participate in the trialFor the duration of the study 3-6 monthsAssessing clinical feasibility for a larger multi-center trial - number of eligible patients versus patients who consent to participate
Proportion of patients who attend each follow-up visitFor the duration of the study 3-6 monthsAssessing clinical feasibility for a larger multi-center trial - number of patients that miss visits versus patients that attend visits.
Proportion of patients completing all required study procedures, per follow-up visitFor the duration of the study 3-6 monthsAssessing clinical feasibility for a larger multi-center trial - number of patients that complete all required procedures/study visits versus patients that do not.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DeathFor the duration of the study 3-6 months* All-cause mortality rates * Individual rates of death related to VTE, cardiovascular disease, bleeding or other causes
Time-to-event analysisFor the duration of the study 3-6 monthsThe time-to-first occurrence of secondary outcomes between randomization and end of follow-up
Bleeding EventsFor the duration of the study 3-6 monthsMajor bleeding events, clinically relevant non-major and minor bleeding episodes
Venous ThromboembolismFor the duration of the study 3-6 monthsRecurrent VTE and VTE related-death
Medication complianceFor the duration of the study 3-6 monthsAs assessed by study pill count

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026