Skip to content

Technology-based Eye Care Services (TECS) Compare

Prospective Comparison of Technology-based Eye Care Services (TECS) With and Without OCT Assessment Versus Standard Face to Face Ophthalmologic Exam

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02558712
Enrollment
256
Registered
2015-09-24
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2017-09-23
Last updated
2018-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract, Glaucoma, Macular Degeneration

Keywords

screening, tele-ophthalmology

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the Technology-based Eye Care Services (TECS) protocol to the standard face to face ophthalmologic exam.

Detailed description

Patients will sign informed consent to enter the one visit study. They will undergo the study protocol and then see the face to face physician on the same day.

Interventions

OTHERTechnology-based Eye Care Services (TECS) Protocol

Extensive History will be taken. Distance auto-refraction measurements will be made on both eyes. Eye pressure using the iCare tonometer and central corneal thickness (CCT) using the corneal pachymeter will be taken for each eye. Participants will have fundus photos taken following the standard VA diabetic teleretinal protocol. Then participants will have OCT Macula and Nerve performed. After protocol complete, then patients will see an ophthalmologist for standard eye exam.

Sponsors

Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient at the Atlanta VA Medical Center (VAMC) New Comprehensive eye clinic

Exclusion criteria

* Known acute or chronic ocular issues

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients with accurate diagnosis of eye diseases from TECS protocol versus face to face eye exam with and without OCTEvaluation Visit (Day 0)Clinical diagnosis in dichotomous (yes/no) decision tree. The clinical diagnosis of the TECS protocol readers will be compared to the face to face physician, with the face to face serving as the standard of care. The results will be done with and without OCT. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value will be calculated before and after OCT.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients appropriately referred from the TECS protocolEvaluation visit (Day 0)Total number of participants with a referral for face to face eye care with and without OCT
Number of participants with an accurate diagnosis for anterior segment diseaseEvaluation visit (Day 0)The responses from an anterior segment questionnaire will be compared to the findings of the face to face physician exam for accuracy, using a (yes/no) decision tree. Sensitivity, specificity will be calculated using the face to face exam as the standard of care.
Inter-reader variability of the TECS protocolEvaluation visit (Day 0)Kappa statistics reflecting the agreement between two readers on the same photo set of a single patient with and without OCT
Intra-reader variability of the TECS protocolEvaluation visit (Day 0)Kappa statistics measuring agreement of the same reader reading the photographs of the same patient twice (after a washout period between photo reading sets) with and without OCT.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026