Skip to content

Optimal Head and Neck Position During Videolaryngoscopy

Optimal Head and Neck Position for Intubation During Videolaryngoscopy: Comparison Between Sniffing and Neutral Position Using Channelled and Non-channelled Videolaryngoscopes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02558036
Enrollment
200
Registered
2015-09-23
Start date
2015-02-11
Completion date
2017-04-27
Last updated
2018-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Position for Intubation

Keywords

Head Neck Position Videolaryngoscopy

Brief summary

Optimal patient head and neck position when performing videolaryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation has not yet been established.The investigators aim to assess the effect of two different positions on the laryngeal view obtained and success of tracheal intubation during videolaryngoscopy with two commercially available and well established videolaryngoscopes.

Detailed description

The optimum patient head and neck position for direct laryngoscopy (when the anaesthetist views the larynx with a curved metallic blade before passing a tube for ventilation of the lungs) is traditionally considered to be the sniffing the morning air (neck flexion and head extension) position. This has been questioned previously as there is no randomized controlled study to date to explore this statement. The patient should be optimally positioned prior to induction of anaesthesia, especially because in the event of an unexpected difficult intubation, the Difficult Airway Society guidelines suggest the use of an alternative laryngoscope. In current clinical practice a videolaryngoscope (a curved blade with a camera attached to it that allows the anaesthetist to see around corners) has been used as an alternative laryngoscope. To the best of our knowledge, the ideal patient position for videolaryngoscopy has not yet been described. The intubation time and rate of success at intubation using a C-Mac D-Blade videolaryngoscope was previously assessed by Serocki et al, but only in the sniffing position. It is possible that adopting a different position when using the C-Mac D- Blade might result in a superior view of the larynx. Furthermore, the optimal patient position has not yet been assessed for intubation with the King Vision videolaryngoscope. This key information could gain precious seconds in a difficult airway scenario (when securing the airway with a tube for ventilation proves difficult) and has obvious implications for patient management. The answer to this question could also help the anaesthetists take informed decisions when using videolaryngoscopy to intubate the trachea in elective settings. The investigators aim to assess the effect of two different positions on the laryngeal view obtained during videolaryngoscopy with two commercially available and well established videolaryngoscopes to try and answer this question.

Interventions

OTHERC-Mac D-Blade Videolaryngoscope

Using C-Mac D-Blade Videolaryngoscope patients will be positioned the neutral Head and Neck Position

OTHERKing Vision Videolaryngoscope

Using the King Vision Videolaryngoscope patients will be positioned in the neutral Head and Neck Position

Sponsors

University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients aged 18 and above, presenting for elective surgical procedure and requiring tracheal intubation will be invited to take part in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are refusing to take part, below 18 years of age, pregnant women, American society of anaesthesiologists' class 4 and above, those requiring rapid sequence indication, super morbidly obese (BMI \>50) and those patients requiring awake fibreoptic intubation will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Optimal Head and Neck Position during Videolaryngoscopy6 monthsThis will be assessed using a Difficult Intubation Scale Score for each of the 2 videolaryngoscopes used in the study, which will be assessed in both neutral and sniffing positions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Laryngoscopy TimeLess than 1 minuteFrom when the laryngoscope enters the mouth until achieving the best view of the larynx.
Intubation TimeLess than 1 minutefrom entering the mouth with the videolaryngoscope until endotracheal tube is inserted in the wind-pipe and the capnography trace is first visible on the screen.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026