Ankylosing Spondylitis
Conditions
Brief summary
An Observational, Prospective Cohort Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of RemsimaTM in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis
Detailed description
This is a longitudinal, observational, prospective cohort study to assess the safety and efficacy of RemsimaTM in patients with AS in comparison with patients receiving other TNF blockers. For the RemsimaTM cohort data will be collected for patients who commence treatment with RemsimaTM in accordance with the product label at the time of enrolment. Patients who have been treated with Remicade® prior to enrolment, their dosing schedule will be continued appropriately. This observational study allows drug switching between anti-TNF drugs. If switched to RemsimaTM, data will be collected until the end of study for each patient. If switched to other anti-TNF drugs (infliximab (Remicade®), etanercept, adalimumab and etc.), data will be collected until 1 year from the day of switch or until the end of study for each patient, whichever reaches earlier. For switched patients, their assessment schedule will be re-started from the day of switch. Patients will undergo safety and efficacy assessments in accordance with routine medical practice. The decision to treat with RemsimaTM will be independent of the decision to enroll the patient in this registry.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patients * Patients with active AS * Patients who meet the following conditions can be enrolled: i) The RemsimaTM cohort will include all patients who will start RemsimaTM at the time of enrolment in accordance to the approved product label ii) Patients who have started to be treated with an established anti -TNF such as Infliximab (Remicade®), Etanercept, Adalimumab and etc. within 6 months * Female patients of childbearing potential who agree to use of adequate contraception to prevent pregnancy and continuation of contraceptive use for at least 6 months after their final dose of RemsimaTM. * Patients (or legal guardian, if applicable) who are willing to give informed consent for long term follow-up including access to all medical records
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to infliximab * Patients with a current or past history of chronic infection * Current diagnosis of TB or severe or chronic infections (e.g. sepsis, abscess or opportunistic infections or invasive fungal infections), or a past diagnosis of TB or severe or chronic infection, without sufficient documentation of complete resolution following treatment. * Recent exposure to persons with active TB, or a positive test result for latent TB (defined as a positive interferon-γ release assay \[IGRA\] with a negative examination of chest X-ray) at Screening. * Patients with moderate or severe heart failure (NYHA class III/IV).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | Duration of study participation (up to 5 years) | * Hepatitis B virus reactivation * Congestive heart failure * Opportunistic infections (excluding tuberculosis) * Serious infections including sepsis (excluding opportunistic infections and tuberculosis) * Tuberculosis (TB) * Serum sickness (delayed hypersensitivity reactions) * Haematological reactions * Systemic lupus erythematosus/lupus-like syndrome * Demyelinating disorders * Lymphoma (not hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma) * Hepatobiliary events * Hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma (HSTCL) * Serious infusion reactions during a re-induction regimen following disease flare * Sarcoidosis/sarcoid-like reactions * Leukaemia * Malignancy (excluding lymphoma) * Skin cancer * Pregnancy exposure * Infusion related reaction (IRR)/hypersensitivity/anaphylactic reaction |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Day 0 ~ Month 48 (every 6 months ±6 weeks) | Physician and Patient Global Assessment of disease status was measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0-100 mm) for EU patients and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10) for Korea patients where higher scores indicated poorer status. Descriptive statistics for actual value of Global Assessment Score were summarized by analysis group and every six months including Day 0. For the summary table, each score of Korea patients in NRS was transformed by multiplying 10. Scores are from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. |
| The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 6 ~ Month 48 (every 6 months ± 6 weeks) | Efficacy was assessed by the evaluation of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). The BASDAI questionnaire consists of 6 component questions about the disease activity. For each question the possible answer from the patient is a whole number from 0 to 10 inclusive where 0 = None and 10 = Very severe. The BASDAI score is generated from the set of 6 questions and calculated using the following formula BASDAI = \[Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4+(\[Q5+Q6\]/2)\]/5. The number and percentage of patients achieving BASDAI 50 will be displayed. BASDAI 50 is defined as a 50% decrease of the baseline BASDAI score. Percentages will be calculated using the number of patients who perform the assessment at each time point. |
| Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Day 0 ~ Month 48 (every 6 months ± 6 weeks) | The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) questionnaire consists of 10 component questions measuring functionality. Each item was given a rating by the patient which is a whole number from 0 to 10 inclusive where 0 = Easy and 10 = Impossible. The BASFI score is generated from the mean of the scores for the 10 items. The lowest score is 0 and the highest score is 10, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of functional limitation in patients. |
| Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Day 0 ~ Month 48 (every 6 months ±6 weeks) | Physician and Patient Global Assessment of disease status was measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0-100 mm) for EU patients and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10) for Korea patients where higher scores indicated poorer status. Descriptive statistics for actual value of Global Assessment Score were summarized by analysis group and every six months including Day 0. For the summary table, each score of Korea patients in NRS was transformed by multiplying 10. Scores are from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. |
| Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Day 0 ~ Month 48 (every 6 months ±6 weeks) | Patient Assessment of Spinal Pain will be measured by VAS (0-100 mm) for EU patients and NRS (0-10) for Korea patients where higher scores indicates more severe pain. Descriptive statistics for actual value of Spinal Pain Score will be summarized by analysis group and every six months including Day 0. For the summary table, each score of Korea patients in NRS will be transformed by multiplying 10. Scores are from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more pain as assessed by the patient. |
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participant flow was summarized by all analysis groups as prespecified in Statistical Analysis Plan.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 350 patients were screened, and 329 patients were enrolled.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Remsima Patients who have received only Remsima were included in this analysis group | 124 |
| Switch to Remsima I Patients who switched from Remicade to Remsima were included in this analysis group. | 23 |
| Switch to Remsima II Patients who switched to Remsima from biologic treatment other than Remicade were included in this analysis group | 10 |
| Remicade Patients who have received only Remicade were included in this analysis group. | 3 |
| Switch to Remicade I Patients who switched from Remsima to Remicade were included in this analysis group. | 5 |
| Switch to Remicade II Patients who switched to Remicade from biologic treatment other than Remsima were included in this analysis group. | 0 |
| Other Anti-TNF Drugs Following patients were included in other anti-TNF group.
* Patients who have received only anti-TNF other than Remsima or Remicade
* Patients who switched from biologic treatment other than anti-TNF before study enrolment to anti-TNF other than Remsima or Remicade | 146 |
| Switch to Other Anti-TNF Patients who switched from Remsima or Remicade to other anti-TNF other than Remicade were included in this analysis group | 18 |
| Total | 329 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 | FG006 | FG007 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Death | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Disease Progression | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Except for study close | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 10 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Study Close | 98 | 18 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 123 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Remsima | Total | Switch to Other Anti-TNF | Other Anti-TNF Drugs | Switch to Remicade I | Remicade | Switch to Remsima II | Switch to Remsima I | Switch to Remicade II |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 37.0 years | 38.0 years | 39 years | 38 years | 41.0 years | 32.0 years | 46.0 years | 42.0 years | — |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 97 Participants | 268 Participants | 8 Participants | 129 Participants | 5 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 23 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 27 Participants | 61 Participants | 10 Participants | 17 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 7 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 26 Participants | 66 Participants | 5 Participants | 26 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 98 Participants | 263 Participants | 13 Participants | 120 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants | 20 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk | EG007 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 124 | 0 / 23 | 0 / 10 | 0 / 3 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 146 | 0 / 18 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 50 / 124 | 9 / 23 | 9 / 10 | 2 / 3 | 2 / 5 | 0 / 0 | 43 / 146 | 7 / 18 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 14 / 124 | 1 / 23 | 2 / 10 | 0 / 3 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 0 | 11 / 146 | 0 / 0 |
Outcome results
The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI)
* Hepatitis B virus reactivation * Congestive heart failure * Opportunistic infections (excluding tuberculosis) * Serious infections including sepsis (excluding opportunistic infections and tuberculosis) * Tuberculosis (TB) * Serum sickness (delayed hypersensitivity reactions) * Haematological reactions * Systemic lupus erythematosus/lupus-like syndrome * Demyelinating disorders * Lymphoma (not hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma) * Hepatobiliary events * Hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma (HSTCL) * Serious infusion reactions during a re-induction regimen following disease flare * Sarcoidosis/sarcoid-like reactions * Leukaemia * Malignancy (excluding lymphoma) * Skin cancer * Pregnancy exposure * Infusion related reaction (IRR)/hypersensitivity/anaphylactic reaction
Time frame: Duration of study participation (up to 5 years)
Population: All patients data were analyzed; however, there were 0 patients recruited in the Switch to Remicade II groups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remsima | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Serious infections including sepsis (excluding opportunistic infections and tuberculosis) | 3 Participants |
| Remsima | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Opportunistic infections (excluding tuberculosis) | 1 Participants |
| Remsima | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of congestive heart failure | 1 Participants |
| Remsima | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of tuberculosis | 3 Participants |
| Remsima | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Haematological reactions | 1 Participants |
| Remsima | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Hepatobiliary events | 9 Participants |
| Remsima | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Malignancies (excluding lymphoma) | 0 Participants |
| Remsima | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Infusion related reaction/hypersensitivity/ anaphylactic reaction | 3 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima I | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Haematological reactions | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima I | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Serious infections including sepsis (excluding opportunistic infections and tuberculosis) | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima I | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Hepatobiliary events | 1 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima I | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Malignancies (excluding lymphoma) | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima I | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of congestive heart failure | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima I | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of tuberculosis | 1 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima I | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Opportunistic infections (excluding tuberculosis) | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima I | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Infusion related reaction/hypersensitivity/ anaphylactic reaction | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima II | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Malignancies (excluding lymphoma) | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima II | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Haematological reactions | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima II | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Infusion related reaction/hypersensitivity/ anaphylactic reaction | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima II | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Serious infections including sepsis (excluding opportunistic infections and tuberculosis) | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima II | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Hepatobiliary events | 2 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima II | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of tuberculosis | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima II | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of congestive heart failure | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima II | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Opportunistic infections (excluding tuberculosis) | 0 Participants |
| Remicade | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Infusion related reaction/hypersensitivity/ anaphylactic reaction | 1 Participants |
| Remicade | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Opportunistic infections (excluding tuberculosis) | 0 Participants |
| Remicade | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of congestive heart failure | 0 Participants |
| Remicade | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of tuberculosis | 0 Participants |
| Remicade | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Serious infections including sepsis (excluding opportunistic infections and tuberculosis) | 0 Participants |
| Remicade | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Haematological reactions | 1 Participants |
| Remicade | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Hepatobiliary events | 0 Participants |
| Remicade | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Malignancies (excluding lymphoma) | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remicade I | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of tuberculosis | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remicade I | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Malignancies (excluding lymphoma) | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remicade I | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Serious infections including sepsis (excluding opportunistic infections and tuberculosis) | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remicade I | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of congestive heart failure | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remicade I | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Infusion related reaction/hypersensitivity/ anaphylactic reaction | 1 Participants |
| Switch to Remicade I | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Haematological reactions | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remicade I | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Hepatobiliary events | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remicade I | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Opportunistic infections (excluding tuberculosis) | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remicade II | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Infusion related reaction/hypersensitivity/ anaphylactic reaction | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remicade II | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Opportunistic infections (excluding tuberculosis) | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remicade II | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Serious infections including sepsis (excluding opportunistic infections and tuberculosis) | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remicade II | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of congestive heart failure | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remicade II | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Malignancies (excluding lymphoma) | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remicade II | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Hepatobiliary events | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remicade II | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Haematological reactions | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remicade II | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of tuberculosis | 0 Participants |
| Other Anti-TNF | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Serious infections including sepsis (excluding opportunistic infections and tuberculosis) | 2 Participants |
| Other Anti-TNF | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Opportunistic infections (excluding tuberculosis) | 0 Participants |
| Other Anti-TNF | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of tuberculosis | 0 Participants |
| Other Anti-TNF | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Haematological reactions | 2 Participants |
| Other Anti-TNF | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Hepatobiliary events | 9 Participants |
| Other Anti-TNF | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Infusion related reaction/hypersensitivity/ anaphylactic reaction | 2 Participants |
| Other Anti-TNF | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Malignancies (excluding lymphoma) | 1 Participants |
| Other Anti-TNF | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of congestive heart failure | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Other Anti-TNF | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Infusion related reaction/hypersensitivity/ anaphylactic reaction | 1 Participants |
| Switch to Other Anti-TNF | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Hepatobiliary events | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Other Anti-TNF | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Haematological reactions | 1 Participants |
| Switch to Other Anti-TNF | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of tuberculosis | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Other Anti-TNF | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Serious infections including sepsis (excluding opportunistic infections and tuberculosis) | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Other Anti-TNF | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Opportunistic infections (excluding tuberculosis) | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Other Anti-TNF | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of congestive heart failure | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Other Anti-TNF | The Number and Percentage of Patients With the Following Adverse of Events of Special Interest (ESI) | TEAE of Malignancies (excluding lymphoma) | 0 Participants |
Descriptive Statistics for BASFI
The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) questionnaire consists of 10 component questions measuring functionality. Each item was given a rating by the patient which is a whole number from 0 to 10 inclusive where 0 = Easy and 10 = Impossible. The BASFI score is generated from the mean of the scores for the 10 items. The lowest score is 0 and the highest score is 10, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of functional limitation in patients.
Time frame: Day 0 ~ Month 48 (every 6 months ± 6 weeks)
Population: The Efficacy Analysis set consisted of all patients who received at least one infliximab dose (Remsima or Remicade) and providing at least one post treatment efficacy result during the analysis period. Efficacy analysis was only performed in the Remsima, Switch to Remsima, Remicade and Switch to Remicade analysis groups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Day 0 | 4.10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.684 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Month 6 | 1.38 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.498 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Month 12 | 1.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.553 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Month 18 | 1.38 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.774 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Month 24 | 1.29 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.854 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Month 30 | 1.23 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.347 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Month 36 | 1.46 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.864 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Month 48 | 1.28 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.274 |
| Switch to Remsima I | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Day 0 | 1.35 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.746 |
| Switch to Remsima I | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Month 18 | 1.70 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.121 |
| Switch to Remsima I | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Month 12 | 1.43 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.679 |
| Switch to Remsima I | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Month 6 | 1.10 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.614 |
| Switch to Remsima II | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Day 0 | 2.07 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.239 |
| Switch to Remsima II | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Month 12 | 3 score on a scale | — |
| Switch to Remsima II | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Month 18 | 2.40 score on a scale | — |
| Switch to Remsima II | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Month 6 | 0.70 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.212 |
| Remicade | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Month 12 | 3.05 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.061 |
| Remicade | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Day 0 | 1.65 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.014 |
| Remicade | Descriptive Statistics for BASFI | Month 6 | 1.93 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.427 |
Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score
Physician and Patient Global Assessment of disease status was measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0-100 mm) for EU patients and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10) for Korea patients where higher scores indicated poorer status. Descriptive statistics for actual value of Global Assessment Score were summarized by analysis group and every six months including Day 0. For the summary table, each score of Korea patients in NRS was transformed by multiplying 10. Scores are from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more disease activity.
Time frame: Day 0 ~ Month 48 (every 6 months ±6 weeks)
Population: The Efficacy Analysis set consisted of all patients who received at least one infliximab dose (Remsima or Remicade) and providing at least one post treatment efficacy result during the analysis period. Efficacy analysis was only performed in the Remsima, Switch to Remsima, Remicade and Switch to Remicade analysis groups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Day 0 | 54.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.76 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Month 6 | 21.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.59 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Month 12 | 21.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.52 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Month 18 | 21.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.37 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Month 24 | 3.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.87 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Month 30 | 2.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.38 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Month 36 | 2.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.79 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Month 48 | 2.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
| Switch to Remsima I | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Day 0 | 25.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.89 |
| Switch to Remsima I | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Month 18 | 25.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.07 |
| Switch to Remsima I | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Month 12 | 19.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.92 |
| Switch to Remsima I | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Month 6 | 20.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.89 |
| Switch to Remsima II | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Day 0 | 25.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.21 |
| Switch to Remsima II | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Month 12 | 30.0 score on a scale | — |
| Switch to Remsima II | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Month 18 | 30.0 score on a scale | — |
| Switch to Remsima II | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Month 6 | 23.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.17 |
| Remicade | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Month 12 | 40.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 42.43 |
| Remicade | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Day 0 | 40.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.44 |
| Remicade | Descriptive Statistics of Patient Global Assessment Score | Month 6 | 35.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.16 |
Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score
Physician and Patient Global Assessment of disease status was measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0-100 mm) for EU patients and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10) for Korea patients where higher scores indicated poorer status. Descriptive statistics for actual value of Global Assessment Score were summarized by analysis group and every six months including Day 0. For the summary table, each score of Korea patients in NRS was transformed by multiplying 10. Scores are from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more disease activity.
Time frame: Day 0 ~ Month 48 (every 6 months ±6 weeks)
Population: The Efficacy Analysis set consisted of all patients who received at least one infliximab dose (Remsima or Remicade) and providing at least one post treatment efficacy result during the analysis period. Efficacy analysis was only performed in the Remsima, Switch to Remsima, Remicade and Switch to Remicade analysis groups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Day 0 | 54.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.09 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Month 6 | 16.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.19 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Month 12 | 15.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.8 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Month 18 | 7.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.93 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Month 24 | 2.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.75 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Month 30 | 0.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Month 36 | 1.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.63 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Month 48 | 2.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.87 |
| Switch to Remsima I | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Day 0 | 20.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.17 |
| Switch to Remsima I | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Month 18 | 30.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.14 |
| Switch to Remsima I | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Month 12 | 11.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.63 |
| Switch to Remsima I | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Month 6 | 13.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.93 |
| Switch to Remsima II | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Day 0 | 30.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.14 |
| Switch to Remsima II | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Month 12 | 30.0 score on a scale | — |
| Switch to Remsima II | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Month 18 | 40.0 score on a scale | — |
| Switch to Remsima II | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Month 6 | 6.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.55 |
| Remicade | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Month 12 | 5.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.07 |
| Remicade | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Day 0 | 22.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.93 |
| Remicade | Descriptive Statistics of Physician Global Assessment Score | Month 6 | 20.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.14 |
Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score
Patient Assessment of Spinal Pain will be measured by VAS (0-100 mm) for EU patients and NRS (0-10) for Korea patients where higher scores indicates more severe pain. Descriptive statistics for actual value of Spinal Pain Score will be summarized by analysis group and every six months including Day 0. For the summary table, each score of Korea patients in NRS will be transformed by multiplying 10. Scores are from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more pain as assessed by the patient.
Time frame: Day 0 ~ Month 48 (every 6 months ±6 weeks)
Population: The Efficacy Analysis set consisted of all patients who received at least one infliximab dose (Remsima or Remicade) and providing at least one post treatment efficacy result during the analysis period. This study's primary objective is to compare RemsimaTM in patients with AS with patients receiving other anti-TNF drugs', especially with 'Remicade'. Therefore Switch to Remsima II and Switch to Other Anti-TNF groups' are excluded from the results.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Day 0 | 52.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.84 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Month 6 | 18.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.83 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Month 12 | 19.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.7 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Month 18 | 16.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.78 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Month 24 | 3.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.87 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Month 30 | 2.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.35 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Month 36 | 2.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.79 |
| Remsima | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Month 48 | 2.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.72 |
| Switch to Remsima I | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Day 0 | 23.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.81 |
| Switch to Remsima I | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Month 18 | 15.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.07 |
| Switch to Remsima I | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Month 12 | 22.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.77 |
| Switch to Remsima I | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Month 6 | 21.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.42 |
| Switch to Remsima II | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Day 0 | 25.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.21 |
| Switch to Remsima II | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Month 12 | 30.0 score on a scale | — |
| Switch to Remsima II | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Month 18 | 30.0 score on a scale | — |
| Switch to Remsima II | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Month 6 | 6.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.55 |
| Remicade | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Month 12 | 25.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.36 |
| Remicade | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Day 0 | 42.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.3 |
| Remicade | Descriptive Statistics of Spinal Pain Score | Month 6 | 27.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.54 |
The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50
Efficacy was assessed by the evaluation of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). The BASDAI questionnaire consists of 6 component questions about the disease activity. For each question the possible answer from the patient is a whole number from 0 to 10 inclusive where 0 = None and 10 = Very severe. The BASDAI score is generated from the set of 6 questions and calculated using the following formula BASDAI = \[Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4+(\[Q5+Q6\]/2)\]/5. The number and percentage of patients achieving BASDAI 50 will be displayed. BASDAI 50 is defined as a 50% decrease of the baseline BASDAI score. Percentages will be calculated using the number of patients who perform the assessment at each time point.
Time frame: Month 6 ~ Month 48 (every 6 months ± 6 weeks)
Population: Efficacy analysis was only performed in the Remsima, Switch to Remsima, Remicade and Switch to Remicade analysis groups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remsima | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 12 | 35 Participants |
| Remsima | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 18 | 16 Participants |
| Remsima | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 36 | 12 Participants |
| Remsima | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 48 | 6 Participants |
| Remsima | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 30 | 11 Participants |
| Remsima | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 24 | 13 Participants |
| Remsima | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 42 | 0 Participants |
| Remsima | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 6 | 60 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima I | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 42 | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima I | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 30 | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima I | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 36 | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima I | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 12 | 1 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima I | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 6 | 5 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima I | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 18 | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima I | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 48 | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima I | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 24 | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima II | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 36 | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima II | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 42 | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima II | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 48 | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima II | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 12 | 1 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima II | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 18 | 1 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima II | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 6 | 3 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima II | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 24 | 0 Participants |
| Switch to Remsima II | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 30 | 0 Participants |
| Remicade | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 48 | 0 Participants |
| Remicade | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 6 | 2 Participants |
| Remicade | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 12 | 1 Participants |
| Remicade | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 18 | 0 Participants |
| Remicade | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 24 | 0 Participants |
| Remicade | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 30 | 0 Participants |
| Remicade | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 36 | 0 Participants |
| Remicade | The Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving BASDAI 50 | Month 42 | 0 Participants |