Skip to content

4S - Seasonal Symptoms Suppression Study

Real Life Proof-of-Concept Study to Assess the Effect of Methylcellulose as add-on Seal to the In-season Pharmacologic Rescue Treatment in Subjects With Allergic Rhinitis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02557269
Acronym
4S
Enrollment
60
Registered
2015-09-23
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2015-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Keywords

Pollenosis, Congestion, Mucoadhesive Treatment, Nasal Decongestant, Nasal Antihistamine, Nasal Corticosteroid

Brief summary

ASIT naïve patients sensitized to grass pollens will be recruited for the study. All of them will be instructed to treat bothersome in-season symptoms when they appear (on as needed, pro re nata basis) with rescue medication. They will be given 5 different options and will be informed about the effects of each of them in order to make their optimal choice for different symptoms and their combination: local decongestant (xylomethazoline, when congestion is leading), local antihistamine (azelastine, when itching, sneezing and rhinorhea a predominant), nasal corticosteroid (momethasone, when all nasal symptoms are pressing and no adequate relief is obtained form the other 2 local treatments), oral antihistamine (bilastine, when itching and sneezing persist despite the local treatments) and oral corticosteroid (prednisolone, when any or all symptoms become unbearable despite the other suggested treatments). Patients who are reluctant to use immunotherapy or who are too late to initiate it will be randomized to be treated with the listed medications on as needed basis, the nasally applied formulations will be followed by either HPMC to prolong and enhance their effect (Group HPMC) or placebo (lactose powder) (Group Placebo) to serve as control. Patients indicated and willing to carry out ASIT will be treated according to the standard protocol with grass allergens sublingually (Staloral #688) and will receive rescue medication (Group Immunotherapy).

Detailed description

Rationale. Assessment and follow up of specifically sensitized subjects with allergic rhinitis during the pollen season is traditionally based on symptom scores. Accounting for the use of rescue medication on top of symptom scores provides another dimension to the overall clinical characterization of the patients. Thus, using combined symptom and medication scores (CSMS) allows thorough characterization of the disease course. Guidelines recommend that CSMS are used for assessment of the effect of allergen specific immunotherapy in subjects with allergic rhinitis. Different allergic rhinitis management strategies can be evaluated and compared by means of CSMS. In the update of the ARIA guidelines of 2010, 24 recommendations have been made in relation to pharmacologic treatment. Special position paper has been devoted to severe chronic upper airway disease (SCUAD), the treatment for which has been earmarked as unmet need. Consequently, a standardized and universally recognized rescue treatment strategy does not exist. The most common approach for handling nasal complaints in real life consists in using rescue medication for symptoms whenever they appear. This is certainly the case when symptoms appear for the first time ever, or when patients do not want to resort to allergen specific immunotherapy (ASIT) and / or regular oral antihistamine treatment for financial reasons or personal beliefs. Under these circumstances, a long list of pharmacological choices for local or systemic application is possible including antihistamines, corticosteroids, leukotriene antagonists, cromones and antimuscarinic drugs. Formulations for local application in the nose appeal to patients with their ease of use and immediate relief. They comprise a variety of generic drugs: decongestants, antihistamines, corticosteroids and antimuscarinics. The fact that they are not ingested makes them first choice for people reluctant to take oral medications. In many cases it is possible to control the symptoms of allergic rhinitis with these formulations used per se or as adjunct rescue medication in the course of ASIT. The question stays whether the effectiveness of nasally applied drugs can further be improved. Despite the good rationale for their mechanism of action, their efficacy is diminished by the cleaning mechanisms of the nose, rhinorrhea in particular. Slowing down of the clearance of the nasal mucosa and prolonging the contact time with the nasal mucosa would enhance their pharmaceutical effects. The investigators have demonstrated by objectively measuring nasal flow rates that sealing in place locally applied oxymetazoline in subjects with persistent allergic rhinitis by means of commercially available hydroxyl-propyl-methyl-cellulose (HPMC) significantly enhances the resulting decongestion and that this effect is augmented over a time span of 2 weeks without noticeable tachyphylaxis or adverse events. The investigators set the aim to investigate whether this beneficial effect of HPMC translates into clinical benefits in a real life clinical trial for other available drug preparations for nasal delivery. Study design. ASIT naïve patients sensitized to grass pollens will be recruited for the study. All of the patients will be instructed to treat bothersome in-season symptoms when they appear (on as needed, pro re nata basis) with rescue medication. The patients will be given 5 different options and will be informed about the effects of each of them in order to make their optimal choice for different symptoms and their combination: local decongestant (xylomethazoline, when congestion is leading), local antihistamine (azelastine, when itching, sneezing and rhinorhea a predominant), nasal corticosteroid (momethasone, when all nasal symptoms are pressing and no adequate relief is obtained form the other 2 local treatments), oral antihistamine (bilastine, when itching and sneezing persist despite the local treatments) and oral corticosteroid (prednisolone, when any or all symptoms become unbearable despite the other suggested treatments). Patients who are reluctant to use immunotherapy or who are too late to initiate it will be randomized to be treated with the listed medications on as needed basis, the nasally applied formulations will be followed by either HPMC to prolong and enhance their effect (Group HPMC) or placebo (lactose powder) (Group Placebo) to serve as control. Patients indicated and willing to carry out ASIT will be treated according to the standard protocol with grass allergens sublingually (Staloral #688) and will receive rescue medication (Group Immunotherapy).

Interventions

DRUGXylometazoline - intranasal application

Applied as needed up to 5 consecutive days when prominent congestion

DRUGAzelastine - intranasal application

Applied as needed when prominent symptom is rhinorrhea

Applied once daily (2 puffs) when no satisfactory therapeutic control from other intranasal treatment

DRUGHydroxyl-propyl-methyl cellulose powder - intranasal application

Applied intranasally immediately after every application other intranasal formulation

OTHERPlacebo - Lactose powder

Applied intranasally immediately after every application other intranasal formulation

1 tablet per os - as needed

Per os - if needed (only in case of broncial obstruction)

Sponsors

Nasaleze
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Association Asthma, Bulgaria
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female patients * Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 55 years * Personal history of rhinitis during the pollen season * Moderately severe / severe seasonal allergic rhinitis (grass) * Positive skin prick test for grass/cereals

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with arterial hypertension, arrhythmia or evidence of heart ischemia * Subjects with other serious chronic comorbidities and bad therapeutic control * Subjects with nasal polyposis * Any contraindications for xylometazoline * Any contraindications for HPMC * Any contraindications for azelastine * Any contraindications for bilastine * Any contraindications for mometasone * Any contraindications for prednisolone * Subjects unable to give informed consent * Pregnant or lactating women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Combined Sypmtom and Medication ScoreUp to 6 monthsThe primary outcome will be comparison of total combined symptoms and medication scores (TCSMS) collected from patients' diaries for a fixed period during the pollen season

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Drug Specific Combined Sypmtom and Medication ScoreUp to 6 monthsDrug specific combined symptoms and medication scores (DsCSMS) will be calculated for each rescue medication and compared between the 3 arms of the trial.
Visual Analogue ScaleUp to 6 monthsVisual analogue scale (VAS) scores (Scores range from 0 \[no symptoms\] to 10 \[worst possible symptoms\]) at each visit and compared between groups.

Countries

Bulgaria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026