Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of SUBLIVAC Phleum for Immunotherapy of Grass Pollen-Allergy

A Single-center, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Investigate the Relative Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapy With SUBLIVAC FIX Phleum Pratense in Grass Pollen-Allergic Subjects With IgE-Mediated Seasonal ARC

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02556801
Enrollment
168
Registered
2015-09-22
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2016-10-31
Last updated
2019-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergic Rhinitis, Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis

Keywords

Sublingual immunotherapy, Dose range finding, Grass pollen, Allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis, Immunogenicity

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess safety, tolerability and demonstrate a dose response signal using Total Symptom Score (TSS), based on challenges with grass pollen in an Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC), followed by estimation of the minimum effective dose of SUBLIVAC FIX Phleum (SP) after 10 months of treatment compared to placebo. The study has 4 treatment groups: 3 different doses of SP and placebo will be tested.

Detailed description

The current dose range finding study with SP has been designed to test three different concentrations of SUBLIVAC FIX Phleum (SP) that includes 3 doses (10,000 AUN/mL; 40,000 AUN/mL; 80,000 AUN/mL) and placebo to demonstrate a dose response signal and to estimate the minimal effective dose of SP. The study will be conducted in the target population of seasonal allergic subjects in a fully validated Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) system. The EEC system is a facility that has temporal uniformity of airborne allergen (pollen) exposure to subjects. Use of the EEC ensures exposure to relatively consistent levels of allergen. This facility has been used in a number of immunotherapy trials and is an improved challenge model of AR compared to the previously used nasal provocation test. Treatment duration of this study is extended to 10 months.

Interventions

sublingual daily administration

Sponsors

HAL Allergy
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double-blind study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects who signed informed consent. 2. Subjects aged ≥18 and ≤65 years at signing of informed consent. 3. Subjects with at least two-year clinical history of allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis to grass pollen, with or without concomitant asthma (asthma must be controlled). 4. Subjects with a forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) \>70% of the predicted value as measured during screening or documented within 1 year of study start. 5. Subjects with a positive skin prick test (SPT) (mean wheal diameter of at least 3 mm larger than the negative control; negative control should be \<2 mm, histamine control should be positive (mean wheal diameter of at least 3 mm larger than the negative control)) for grass pollen assessed during screening or a documented positive response obtained within 1 year before screening. 6. Subjects with a grass pollen specific IgE greater than or equal to 0.7 kiloUnits (kU)/L assessed during screening or a documented positive result obtained within 1 year before screening. 7. Subjects with a TSS of at least 10/24 during baseline EEC challenge (V2) in combination with a staff assessed score of at least 2/3 for two objective TSS symptoms (i.e. running nose, sneezing or red eyes), during the baseline EEC challenge.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects with (expected) clinically relevant symptoms at the timing of the scheduled EEC assessments at Visit 2 and Visit 6 due to concomitant sensitization i.e. positive SPT (mean wheal diameter of at least 3 mm larger than the negative control) and a history of allergic response to the causative allergen, at the discretion of the investigator. 2. Patients with grass pollen induced asthma. 3. Subjects who cannot tolerate the Baseline Challenge in the EEC. 4. Subjects who received immunotherapy (SCIT or SLIT) with grass pollen allergens within the past 5 years. 5. (Ongoing) allergen-specific immunotherapy with any allergen(s) during the study period. 6. Subjects with unsuccessful allergen-specific immunotherapy within the past 5 years (e.g., but not limited to, prematurely stopped immunotherapy due to non-compliance, AEs or lack of therapeutic effect), at the discretion of the investigator. 7. Subjects undergoing anti-IgE therapy within the 6 months prior to inclusion and/or during the study. 8. Subjects suffering from severe immune disorders (including auto-immune diseases) and/or diseases requiring immunosuppressive drugs. 9. Subjects suffering from active malignancies or any malignant disease (except for localized basal cell cancers of the skin as long as they have been adequately treated and no recurrence within 3 months of screening visit) during 5 years prior to screening. 10. Subjects suffering from severe uncontrolled diseases that could increase the risk for participating in the study, including but not limited to: cardiovascular insufficiency, any severe or unstable lung diseases, endocrine diseases, clinically significant renal or hepatic diseases, or haematological disorders at the discretion of the Investigator. 11. Subjects who have active inflammation or infection of the target organs (nose, eyes or lower airways) at Visit 1. 12. Subjects suffering from diseases with a contraindication for the use of adrenaline (e.g. hyperthyroidism, glaucoma). 13. Subjects receiving vaccination within one week before start of therapy or during the up-dosing phase. 14. Subjects receiving treatment with systemic steroids within 4 weeks before visit 1 and/or during the study. 15. Subjects receiving treatment with systemic or local β-blockers anytime during the study. 16. Subjects who participated in a clinical study within the last 3 months (e.g. new investigational drug or biological) or within the last 30 days (e.g. bio-equivalent drug), at the discretion of the Investigator. 17. Female subjects of child-bearing potential who are pregnant, lactating or using inadequate contraceptive measures (adequate contraceptive measures will be: sexual abstinence; oral contraceptives, trans dermal patches or depot injection of a progestogen drug (starting at least 4 weeks prior to investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration); double barrier method: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) plus spermicidal agent; intrauterine device (IUD), intrauterine system (IUS), implant, or vaginal ring (placed at least 4 weeks prior to IMP administration); or male partner sterilization (vasectomy with documentation of azoospermia) prior to the female subject's entry into trial and is the sole sexual partner for that female subject. 18. Subjects that have a history of alcohol, drug or medication abuse within the past year before study start. 19. Subjects with any clinically relevant abnormal laboratory parameter at screening. 20. Subjects that lack cooperation or compliance, as judged by the investigator. 21. Subjects suffering from severe psychiatric, psychological, or neurological disorders. 22. Subjects who are employees of the sponsor or contract research organisation and/or 1st grade relatives or partners of the (principal) investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6) Compared to Placebo10 months after treatment start (baseline - Visit 2)The primary endpoint was the TSS after 10 months of treatment (at visit 6). The mean TSS at visit 6 was calculated as an average of all non-missing TSS scores between 1 and 6 hours after start of Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) challenge at visit 6. TSS was computed as the sum of individual scores for eight nasal and non-nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, congestion, sneezing, itchiness, itchy/gritty eyes, tearing/watery eyes, red/burning eyes, and ear/palate itching). Each of eight symptoms was rated on a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe. The range of TSS is from 0 to 24 units on a scale. The highest the score, the more severe symptoms a subject experiences. Negative change of TSS between baseline and visit 6 was expected (reduced symptoms), more negative change at visit 6 versus baseline represents better outcome of the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Mean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6)10 months after treatment start compared to first day of treatment (TSS at baseline measured at Visit 2, before IMP administration)The change from baseline of the mean TSS at visit 6. The baseline will be calculated as an average of all non-missing TSS scores between 1 and 6 hours after start of Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) challenge at visit 2. The range of TSS is from 0 to 24 units on a scale. The highest the score, the more severe symptoms a subject experiences. Negative change of TSS between baseline and visit 6 was expected (reduced symptoms), more negative change at visit 6 versus baseline represents better outcome of the study.
Change From Baseline in Mean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 5 Months of Treatment (Visit 4)5 months after treatment start compared to first day of treatment (TSS at baseline measured at Visit 2, before IMP administration)The change from baseline of the mean TSS at visit 4. The mean TSS at visit 4 will be calculated as an average of all non-missing TSS between 1 and 6 hours after start of Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) challenge at visit 4. The baseline will be calculated as an average of all non-missing TSS between 1 and 6 hours after start of EEC challenge at visit 2. The range of TSS is from 0 to 24 units on a scale. The highest the score, the more severe symptoms a subject experiences. Negative change of TSS between baseline and visit 4 was expected (reduced symptoms), more negative change at visit 4 versus baseline represents better outcome of the study.The highest the score, the more severe symptoms a subject experiences.
Change From Baseline in Mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6)10 months after treatment start compared to first day of treatment (TSS at baseline measured at Visit 2, before IMP injection)The change from baseline of the mean TNSS at visit 6. The mean TNSS at visit 6 will be calculated as an average of all non-missing TNSS between 1 and 6 hours after start of EEC challenge at visit 6. The baseline will be calculated as an average of all non-missing TNSS between 1 and 6 hours after start of Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) challenge at visit 2. TNSS will be computed as the sum of individual scores for four nasal symptoms (running nose, congestion, itchy nose, and sneezing). Each of the four symptoms will be rated on a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; and 3, severe. The range of TNSS is from 0 to 12 units on a scale. The highest the score, the more severe symptoms a subject experiences.Negative change of TNSS between baseline and visit 6 was expected (reduced symptoms), more negative change at visit 6 versus baseline represents better outcome of the study.
Change From Baseline in Mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) After 5 Months of Treatment (Visit 4)5 months after treatment start compared to first day of treatment (TSS at baseline measured at Visit 2, before IMP injection)The change from baseline of the mean TNSS at visit 4. The mean TNSS at visit 4 will be calculated as an average of all non-missing TNSS between 1 and 6 hours after start of Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) challenge at visit 4. The baseline will be calculated as an average of all non-missing TNSS between 1 and 6 hours after start of during EEC challenge at visit 2. TNSS will be computed as the sum of individual scores for four nasal symptoms (running nose, congestion, itchy nose, and sneezing). Each of the four symptoms will be rated on a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; and 3, severe. The range of TNSS is from 0 to 12 units on a scale. The highest the score, the more severe symptoms a subject experiences. Negative change of TSS between baseline and visit 6 was expected (reduced symptoms), more negative change at visit 4 versus baseline represents better outcome of the study.
Change From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of Treatment5 and 10 months after treatment start compared to first day of treatment (IgG at baseline measured at Visit 2, before IMP injection)Changes from baseline in serum specific immunoglobulin levels (IgG ATG, IgG AP1 and IgG AP5) after after 5 months of treatment (Visit 4) and after 10 months of treatment (Visit 6). Measurements at visit 1 will be used as baseline.
Change From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of Treatment5 and 10 months after treatment start compared to first day of treatment (IgG4 at baseline measured at Visit 2, before IMP injection)Changes from baseline in serum specific immunoglobulin levels (IgG4 ATG, IgG4 AP1 and IgG4 AP5) after 5 months of treatment (Visit 4) and after 10 months of treatment (Visit 6). Measurements at visit 1 will be used as baseline.
Mean Combined Symptom and Medication Scores (CSMS) During the Grass Pollen Season.during the grass pollen season: estimated between 6 and 10 months after start of treatment at Visit 2The mean CSMS will be calculated as an average of all non-missing daily CSMS during the grass pollen season. Subjects that did not complete at least 75% of their diary data, and subjects who have been on holidays outside the region for more than 7 days during the actual grass pollen season will be excluded from the analysis. The daily CSMS will be computed according to the definition given by the EAACI Position Paper. The actual grass pollen season would start on the first of 3 consecutive days that have a grass pollen count ≥ 10 ppm3 per 24 hours and the season would end on the first of 3 consecutive days that have a grass pollen count \< 10 ppm3 per 24 hours. The defined pollen season could consist of several separate periods that comply with this definition. The CSMS has a range from 0 to 6 and the higher the score, the more severe symptoms a subject is experiencing.
Change From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgE) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of Treatment5 and 10 months after treatment start compared to first day of treatment (IgE at baseline measured at Visit 2, before IMP administration)Changes from baseline in serum specific immunoglobulin levels (IgE) after after 5 months of treatment (Visit 4) and after 10 months of treatment (Visit 6). Measurements at visit 1 will be used as baseline.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number and Severity of Local ReactionsOngoing during 10 months treatment periodThe total number and severity (mild, moderate or severe) of local reactions (reported as TEAE) in the active treatment groups and placebo treatment group. Intensity grading: Mild: Awareness of symptoms but easily tolerated, no disruption of normal activities. Moderate: Discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity. Severe: Incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity.
Number and Severity of Systemic ReactionsOngoing during 10 months treatment periodThe total number and severity (Grade I, Grade II or Grade III) of systemic reactions in the active treatment groups and placebo treatment group. The grading was done according to the World Allergy Organization grading system: Grade 0: No symptoms or non-immunotherapy-related symptoms Grade I: Mild systemic reactions, symptoms: localized urticaria, rhinitis or mild asthma (PF \< 20% decrease from baseline) Grade II: Moderate systemic reactions, symptoms: Slow onset (\>15 min) of generalized urticaria and/or moderate asthma (PF \< 40% decrease from baseline) Grade III: Severe (non-life-threatening) systemic reactions, symptoms: Rapid onset (\<15 min) of generalized urticaria, angioedema or severe asthma (PF \> 40% decrease from baseline) Grade IV: Anaphylactic shock, symptoms: Immediate evoked reaction of itching, flushing, erythema, generalized urticaria, stridor (angioedema), immediate asthma, hypotension, etc.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The total recruitment period of the study was from September until November 2015. As soon as approx. 160 subjects had been randomized, recruitment was stopped and the investigator was informed to end recruitment of patients. Already screened patients were randomized, if eligible. See summary in the table below.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Patients received placebo (containing no allergen extract) sublingually. Subjects started with one drop and one drop was added each consecutive day until the maintenance dose of 5 drops per day was reached. Next treatment at maintenance dose was continued during 10 months.
42
SP 10,000 AUN/ml
Patients received SUBLIVAC FIX Phleum Pratense 10,000 AUN/ml) sublingually. Subjects started with one drop and one drop was added each consecutive day until the maintenance dose of 5 drops per day was reached. Next treatment at maintenance dose was continued during 10 months.
42
SP 40,000 AUN/ml
Patients received SUBLIVAC FIX Phleum Pratense 40,000 AUN/ml sublingually. Subjects started with one drop and one drop was added each consecutive day until the maintenance dose of 5 drops per day was reached. Next treatment at maintenance dose was continued during 10 months.
42
SP 80,000 AUN/ml
Patients received SUBLIVAC FIX Phleum Pratense 80,000 AUN/ml sublingually. Subjects started with one drop and one drop was added each consecutive day until the maintenance dose of 5 drops per day was reached. Next treatment at maintenance dose was continued during 10 months.
42
Total168

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0203
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1020
Overall StudyPersonal reasons patient0001
Overall StudyPregnancy0100
Overall StudyProtocol Violation0311
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1110

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSP 10,000 AUN/mlSP 40,000 AUN/mlPlaceboSP 80,000 AUN/mlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
42 Participants42 Participants41 Participants42 Participants167 Participants
Age, Continuous42.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
39.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
39.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
40.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
40.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
Region of Enrollment
Canada
42 participants42 participants42 participants42 participants168 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants22 Participants27 Participants28 Participants100 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants20 Participants15 Participants14 Participants68 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 420 / 420 / 420 / 42
other
Total, other adverse events
26 / 4236 / 4233 / 4236 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 421 / 420 / 421 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6) Compared to Placebo

The primary endpoint was the TSS after 10 months of treatment (at visit 6). The mean TSS at visit 6 was calculated as an average of all non-missing TSS scores between 1 and 6 hours after start of Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) challenge at visit 6. TSS was computed as the sum of individual scores for eight nasal and non-nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, congestion, sneezing, itchiness, itchy/gritty eyes, tearing/watery eyes, red/burning eyes, and ear/palate itching). Each of eight symptoms was rated on a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe. The range of TSS is from 0 to 24 units on a scale. The highest the score, the more severe symptoms a subject experiences. Negative change of TSS between baseline and visit 6 was expected (reduced symptoms), more negative change at visit 6 versus baseline represents better outcome of the study.

Time frame: 10 months after treatment start (baseline - Visit 2)

Population: The Intention-to-Treat population (ITT) includes all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and for whom at least one post-baseline measurement for the primary efficacy endpoint was available.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6) Compared to Placebo10.01 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
SP 10,000 AUN/mlMean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6) Compared to Placebo8.06 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.85
SP 40,000 AUN/mlMean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6) Compared to Placebo8.19 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.82
SP 80,000 AUN/mlMean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6) Compared to Placebo7.69 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
90% CI: [-3.89, -0.03]
90% CI: [-3.72, 0.06]
p-value: 0.057MCP-Mod Method
90% CI: [-4.23, -0.43]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6)

The change from baseline of the mean TNSS at visit 6. The mean TNSS at visit 6 will be calculated as an average of all non-missing TNSS between 1 and 6 hours after start of EEC challenge at visit 6. The baseline will be calculated as an average of all non-missing TNSS between 1 and 6 hours after start of Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) challenge at visit 2. TNSS will be computed as the sum of individual scores for four nasal symptoms (running nose, congestion, itchy nose, and sneezing). Each of the four symptoms will be rated on a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; and 3, severe. The range of TNSS is from 0 to 12 units on a scale. The highest the score, the more severe symptoms a subject experiences.Negative change of TNSS between baseline and visit 6 was expected (reduced symptoms), more negative change at visit 6 versus baseline represents better outcome of the study.

Time frame: 10 months after treatment start compared to first day of treatment (TSS at baseline measured at Visit 2, before IMP injection)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6)-1.87 mean Total Nasal Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.43
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6)-2.76 mean Total Nasal Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.46
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6)-2.75 mean Total Nasal Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.44
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6)-2.98 mean Total Nasal Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.44
p-value: =0.07990% CI: [-1.93, 0.15]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: =0.07690% CI: [-1.89, 0.13]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: =0.0380.62% CI: [-2.13, -0.08]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) After 5 Months of Treatment (Visit 4)

The change from baseline of the mean TNSS at visit 4. The mean TNSS at visit 4 will be calculated as an average of all non-missing TNSS between 1 and 6 hours after start of Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) challenge at visit 4. The baseline will be calculated as an average of all non-missing TNSS between 1 and 6 hours after start of during EEC challenge at visit 2. TNSS will be computed as the sum of individual scores for four nasal symptoms (running nose, congestion, itchy nose, and sneezing). Each of the four symptoms will be rated on a scale of 0-3 as follows: 0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; and 3, severe. The range of TNSS is from 0 to 12 units on a scale. The highest the score, the more severe symptoms a subject experiences. Negative change of TSS between baseline and visit 6 was expected (reduced symptoms), more negative change at visit 4 versus baseline represents better outcome of the study.

Time frame: 5 months after treatment start compared to first day of treatment (TSS at baseline measured at Visit 2, before IMP injection)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) After 5 Months of Treatment (Visit 4)-1.52 mean Total Nasal Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.39
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) After 5 Months of Treatment (Visit 4)-1.59 mean Total Nasal Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.42
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) After 5 Months of Treatment (Visit 4)-2.14 mean Total Nasal Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.4
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) After 5 Months of Treatment (Visit 4)-2.02 mean Total Nasal Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.42
p-value: =0.45190% CI: [-1.03, 0.88]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: =0.13790% CI: [-1.55, 0.32]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: =0.19590% CI: [-1.45, 0.46]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6)

The change from baseline of the mean TSS at visit 6. The baseline will be calculated as an average of all non-missing TSS scores between 1 and 6 hours after start of Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) challenge at visit 2. The range of TSS is from 0 to 24 units on a scale. The highest the score, the more severe symptoms a subject experiences. Negative change of TSS between baseline and visit 6 was expected (reduced symptoms), more negative change at visit 6 versus baseline represents better outcome of the study.

Time frame: 10 months after treatment start compared to first day of treatment (TSS at baseline measured at Visit 2, before IMP administration)

Population: The Intention-to-Treat population (ITT) consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and for whom at least one post-baseline measurement for the primary efficacy endpoint was available.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6)-3.45 mean Total Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.8
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Mean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6)-5.37 mean Total Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.85
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Mean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6)-5.24 mean Total Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.81
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Mean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 10 Months of Treatment (Visit 6)-5.74 mean Total Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.83
p-value: =0.05190% CI: [-3.85, 0.01]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.05990% CI: [-3.68, 0.1]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.02490% CI: [-4.2, -0.4]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 5 Months of Treatment (Visit 4)

The change from baseline of the mean TSS at visit 4. The mean TSS at visit 4 will be calculated as an average of all non-missing TSS between 1 and 6 hours after start of Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) challenge at visit 4. The baseline will be calculated as an average of all non-missing TSS between 1 and 6 hours after start of EEC challenge at visit 2. The range of TSS is from 0 to 24 units on a scale. The highest the score, the more severe symptoms a subject experiences. Negative change of TSS between baseline and visit 4 was expected (reduced symptoms), more negative change at visit 4 versus baseline represents better outcome of the study.The highest the score, the more severe symptoms a subject experiences.

Time frame: 5 months after treatment start compared to first day of treatment (TSS at baseline measured at Visit 2, before IMP administration)

Population: The Intention-to-Treat population (ITT) consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and for whom at least one post-baseline measurement for the primary efficacy endpoint was available.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 5 Months of Treatment (Visit 4)-2.40 mean Total Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.74
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Mean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 5 Months of Treatment (Visit 4)-3.00 mean Total Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.79
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Mean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 5 Months of Treatment (Visit 4)-4.24 mean Total Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.76
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Mean Total Symptom Score (TSS) After 5 Months of Treatment (Visit 4)-4.18 mean Total Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.78
p-value: 0.29190% CI: [-2.39, 1.19]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: =0.04290% CI: [-3.6, -0.09]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.0590% CI: [-3.56, 0]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgE) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of Treatment

Changes from baseline in serum specific immunoglobulin levels (IgE) after after 5 months of treatment (Visit 4) and after 10 months of treatment (Visit 6). Measurements at visit 1 will be used as baseline.

Time frame: 5 and 10 months after treatment start compared to first day of treatment (IgE at baseline measured at Visit 2, before IMP administration)

Population: The Intention-to-Treat population (ITT) consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and for whom at least one post-baseline measurement for the primary efficacy endpoint was available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgE) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentAfter 10 months (Visit 6)1.73 Geometric Mean fold change
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgE) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentAfter 5 months (Visit 4)1.48 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgE) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentAfter 10 months (Visit 6)2.47 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgE) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentAfter 5 months (Visit 4)2.83 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgE) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentAfter 10 months (Visit 6)2.90 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgE) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentAfter 5 months (Visit 4)3.59 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgE) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentAfter 5 months (Visit 4)3.45 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgE) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentAfter 10 months (Visit 6)2.37 Geometric Mean fold change
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgE levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.41, 2.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgE levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.8, 3.27]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgE levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.73, 3.15]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgE levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: 0.02990% CI: [1.05, 1.93]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgE levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: 0.00390% CI: [1.24, 2.25]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgE levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: 0.04290% CI: [1.01, 1.85]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of Treatment

Changes from baseline in serum specific immunoglobulin levels (IgG4 ATG, IgG4 AP1 and IgG4 AP5) after 5 months of treatment (Visit 4) and after 10 months of treatment (Visit 6). Measurements at visit 1 will be used as baseline.

Time frame: 5 and 10 months after treatment start compared to first day of treatment (IgG4 at baseline measured at Visit 2, before IMP injection)

Population: The Intention-to-Treat population (ITT) consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and for whom at least one post-baseline measurement for the primary efficacy endpoint was available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 ATG after 5 months (Visit 4)1.01 Geometric Mean fold change
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 AP1 after 10 months (Visit 6)1.12 Geometric Mean fold change
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 AP1 after 5 months (Visit 4)1.04 Geometric Mean fold change
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG5 AP5 after 10 months (Visit 6)1.16 Geometric Mean fold change
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 AP5 after 5 months (Visit 4)1.03 Geometric Mean fold change
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 ATG after 10 months (Visit 6)1.11 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 AP1 after 5 months (Visit 4)1.22 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 ATG after 5 months (Visit 4)1.34 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 ATG after 10 months (Visit 6)1.65 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 AP1 after 10 months (Visit 6)1.56 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 AP5 after 5 months (Visit 4)1.57 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG5 AP5 after 10 months (Visit 6)1.94 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 ATG after 10 months (Visit 6)3.21 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 AP1 after 10 months (Visit 6)2.66 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG5 AP5 after 10 months (Visit 6)3.12 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 AP5 after 5 months (Visit 4)2.42 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 ATG after 5 months (Visit 4)2.18 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 AP1 after 5 months (Visit 4)2.06 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 ATG after 10 months (Visit 6)2.36 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG5 AP5 after 10 months (Visit 6)3.35 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 AP5 after 5 months (Visit 4)2.91 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 AP1 after 10 months (Visit 6)1.90 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 ATG after 5 months (Visit 4)2.05 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG4) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG4 AP1 after 5 months (Visit 4)1.63 Geometric Mean fold change
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 ATG levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: 0.03290% CI: [1.03, 1.7]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 ATG levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.68, 2.74]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 ATG levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.59, 2.59]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 ATG levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: 0.02490% CI: [1.07, 2.06]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 ATG levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [2.09, 3.98]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 ATG levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.54, 2.93]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 AP1 levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: 0.10290% CI: [0.95, 1.47]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 AP1 levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.61, 2.46]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 AP1 levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.27, 1.94]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 AP1 levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: 0.01990% CI: [1.07, 1.81]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 AP1 levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.84, 3.08]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 AP1 levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.31, 2.19]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 AP5 levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: 0.04890% CI: [1.01, 2.31]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 AP5 levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.56, 3.53]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 AP5 levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.88, 4.24]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 AP5 levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: 0.0490% CI: [1.03, 2.69]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 AP5 levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.67, 4.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG4 AP5 levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.8, 4.62]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of Treatment

Changes from baseline in serum specific immunoglobulin levels (IgG ATG, IgG AP1 and IgG AP5) after after 5 months of treatment (Visit 4) and after 10 months of treatment (Visit 6). Measurements at visit 1 will be used as baseline.

Time frame: 5 and 10 months after treatment start compared to first day of treatment (IgG at baseline measured at Visit 2, before IMP injection)

Population: The Intention-to-Treat population (ITT) consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and for whom at least one post-baseline measurement for the primary efficacy endpoint was available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG AP5 after 10 months (Visit 6)0.98 Geometric Mean fold change
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG AP5 after 5 months (Visit 4)0.99 Geometric Mean fold change
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG AP1 after 10 months (Visit 6)0.99 Geometric Mean fold change
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG ATG after 5 months (Visit 4)0.99 Geometric Mean fold change
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG AP1 after 5 months (Visit 4)0.98 Geometric Mean fold change
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG ATG after 10 months (Visit 6)0.98 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG AP1 after 5 months (Visit 4)0.97 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG ATG after 5 months (Visit 4)1.10 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG ATG after 10 months (Visit 6)1.21 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG AP1 after 10 months (Visit 6)1.01 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG AP5 after 10 months (Visit 6)1.07 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 10,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG AP5 after 5 months (Visit 4)1.03 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG ATG after 10 months (Visit 6)1.57 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG AP1 after 5 months (Visit 4)1.08 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG ATG after 5 months (Visit 4)1.28 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG AP1 after 10 months (Visit 6)1.20 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG AP5 after 10 months (Visit 6)1.25 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 40,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG AP5 after 5 months (Visit 4)1.15 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG ATG after 5 months (Visit 4)1.23 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG AP5 after 10 months (Visit 6)1.23 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG AP1 after 5 months (Visit 4)1.00 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG ATG after 10 months (Visit 6)1.36 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG AP5 after 5 months (Visit 4)1.14 Geometric Mean fold change
SP 80,000 AUN/mlChange From Baseline in Serum Specific Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels After 5 Months (Visit 4) and 10 Months (Visit 6) of TreatmentIgG AP1 after 10 months (Visit 6)1.10 Geometric Mean fold change
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG ATG levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: 0.05790% CI: [1, 1.23]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG ATG levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.17, 1.43]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG ATG levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.12, 1.37]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG ATG levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: 0.01590% CI: [1.05, 1.45]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG ATG levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.37, 1.87]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG ATG levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.19, 1.62]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG AP1 levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: 0.34190% CI: [0.93, 1.04]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG AP1 levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: 0.00390% CI: [1.04, 1.16]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG AP1 levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: 0.26990% CI: [0.97, 1.08]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG AP1 levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: 0.31290% CI: [0.95, 1.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG AP1 levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.13, 1.31]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG AP1 levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: 0.00890% CI: [1.03, 1.2]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG AP5 levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: 0.21290% CI: [0.96, 1.14]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG AP5 levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: 0.00290% CI: [1.07, 1.27]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG AP5 levels after 5 months (Visit 4)p-value: 0.00490% CI: [1.06, 1.25]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG AP5 levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: 0.12690% CI: [0.96, 1.24]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG AP5 levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: <0.00190% CI: [1.13, 1.45]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Analysis of change from baseline of serum specific IgG AP5 levels after 10 months (Visit 6)p-value: 0.00290% CI: [1.11, 1.43]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Combined Symptom and Medication Scores (CSMS) During the Grass Pollen Season.

The mean CSMS will be calculated as an average of all non-missing daily CSMS during the grass pollen season. Subjects that did not complete at least 75% of their diary data, and subjects who have been on holidays outside the region for more than 7 days during the actual grass pollen season will be excluded from the analysis. The daily CSMS will be computed according to the definition given by the EAACI Position Paper. The actual grass pollen season would start on the first of 3 consecutive days that have a grass pollen count ≥ 10 ppm3 per 24 hours and the season would end on the first of 3 consecutive days that have a grass pollen count \< 10 ppm3 per 24 hours. The defined pollen season could consist of several separate periods that comply with this definition. The CSMS has a range from 0 to 6 and the higher the score, the more severe symptoms a subject is experiencing.

Time frame: during the grass pollen season: estimated between 6 and 10 months after start of treatment at Visit 2

Population: The Intention-to-Treat population (ITT) consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and for whom at least one post-baseline measurement for the primary efficacy endpoint was available.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Combined Symptom and Medication Scores (CSMS) During the Grass Pollen Season.1.032 mean Combined Symptom Medication ScoreStandard Error 0.135
SP 10,000 AUN/mlMean Combined Symptom and Medication Scores (CSMS) During the Grass Pollen Season.0.678 mean Combined Symptom Medication ScoreStandard Error 0.124
SP 40,000 AUN/mlMean Combined Symptom and Medication Scores (CSMS) During the Grass Pollen Season.0.638 mean Combined Symptom Medication ScoreStandard Error 0.128
SP 80,000 AUN/mlMean Combined Symptom and Medication Scores (CSMS) During the Grass Pollen Season.0.752 mean Combined Symptom Medication ScoreStandard Error 0.122
p-value: =0.02890% CI: [-0.657, -0.05]ANOVA
p-value: =0.01890% CI: [-0.702, -0.086]ANOVA
p-value: =0.06390% CI: [-0.581, 0.021]ANOVA
Other Pre-specified

Number and Severity of Local Reactions

The total number and severity (mild, moderate or severe) of local reactions (reported as TEAE) in the active treatment groups and placebo treatment group. Intensity grading: Mild: Awareness of symptoms but easily tolerated, no disruption of normal activities. Moderate: Discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity. Severe: Incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity.

Time frame: Ongoing during 10 months treatment period

Population: The Safety population consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug. The subjects were included in the treatment group corresponding to the study drug they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber and Severity of Local ReactionsSevere local reactions0 reactions
PlaceboNumber and Severity of Local ReactionsModerate local reactions0 reactions
PlaceboNumber and Severity of Local ReactionsTotal local reactions26 reactions
PlaceboNumber and Severity of Local ReactionsMild local reactions26 reactions
SP 10,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Local ReactionsTotal local reactions55 reactions
SP 10,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Local ReactionsMild local reactions52 reactions
SP 10,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Local ReactionsSevere local reactions0 reactions
SP 10,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Local ReactionsModerate local reactions3 reactions
SP 40,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Local ReactionsSevere local reactions1 reactions
SP 40,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Local ReactionsTotal local reactions91 reactions
SP 40,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Local ReactionsMild local reactions82 reactions
SP 40,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Local ReactionsModerate local reactions8 reactions
SP 80,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Local ReactionsTotal local reactions147 reactions
SP 80,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Local ReactionsSevere local reactions0 reactions
SP 80,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Local ReactionsModerate local reactions7 reactions
SP 80,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Local ReactionsMild local reactions140 reactions
Other Pre-specified

Number and Severity of Systemic Reactions

The total number and severity (Grade I, Grade II or Grade III) of systemic reactions in the active treatment groups and placebo treatment group. The grading was done according to the World Allergy Organization grading system: Grade 0: No symptoms or non-immunotherapy-related symptoms Grade I: Mild systemic reactions, symptoms: localized urticaria, rhinitis or mild asthma (PF \< 20% decrease from baseline) Grade II: Moderate systemic reactions, symptoms: Slow onset (\>15 min) of generalized urticaria and/or moderate asthma (PF \< 40% decrease from baseline) Grade III: Severe (non-life-threatening) systemic reactions, symptoms: Rapid onset (\<15 min) of generalized urticaria, angioedema or severe asthma (PF \> 40% decrease from baseline) Grade IV: Anaphylactic shock, symptoms: Immediate evoked reaction of itching, flushing, erythema, generalized urticaria, stridor (angioedema), immediate asthma, hypotension, etc.

Time frame: Ongoing during 10 months treatment period

Population: The Safety population consists of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug. The subjects were included in the treatment group corresponding to the study drug they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber and Severity of Systemic ReactionsSystemic reactions Grade I69 reactions
PlaceboNumber and Severity of Systemic ReactionsSystemic reactions Grade III0 reactions
PlaceboNumber and Severity of Systemic ReactionsTotal Systemic reacions69 reactions
PlaceboNumber and Severity of Systemic ReactionsSystemic reactions Grade II0 reactions
SP 10,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Systemic ReactionsTotal Systemic reacions6 reactions
SP 10,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Systemic ReactionsSystemic reactions Grade III0 reactions
SP 10,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Systemic ReactionsSystemic reactions Grade II0 reactions
SP 10,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Systemic ReactionsSystemic reactions Grade I6 reactions
SP 40,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Systemic ReactionsTotal Systemic reacions14 reactions
SP 40,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Systemic ReactionsSystemic reactions Grade I14 reactions
SP 40,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Systemic ReactionsSystemic reactions Grade II0 reactions
SP 40,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Systemic ReactionsSystemic reactions Grade III0 reactions
SP 80,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Systemic ReactionsSystemic reactions Grade II0 reactions
SP 80,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Systemic ReactionsSystemic reactions Grade I27 reactions
SP 80,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Systemic ReactionsTotal Systemic reacions27 reactions
SP 80,000 AUN/mlNumber and Severity of Systemic ReactionsSystemic reactions Grade III0 reactions

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026