Skip to content

Prophylactic Topical Agents in Reducing Radiation-Induced Dermatitis in Patients With Non-inflammatory Breast Cancer

Effectiveness of Prophylactic Topical Agents for Radiation Dermatitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02556632
Acronym
Curcumin-II
Enrollment
191
Registered
2015-09-22
Start date
2015-10-13
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2017-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Carcinoma, Pain, Radiation-Induced Dermatitis, Stage 0 Breast Cancer

Brief summary

This randomized pilot phase II trial studies and compares prophylactic topical agents in reducing radiation-induced dermatitis in patients with non-inflammatory breast cancer or breast cancer in situ. The prophylactic topical agents, such as curcumin-based gel or HPR Plus, may reduce the severity of the radiation-induced dermatitis by minimizing water loss and inflammation during radiation therapy.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To investigate the effectiveness of Curcumin gel (curcumin-based gel) or HPR Plus™ in reducing radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients.

Interventions

OTHERLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

DRUGCurcumin-based Gel

Applied topically

PROCEDUREDermatologic Complications Management

Apply HPR Plus topically

OTHERPlacebo

Apply placebo gel topically

OTHERQuestionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Gary Morrow
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with a diagnosis of non-inflammatory breast cancer or carcinoma in situ * Subjects must be prescribed and scheduled for conventional fractionated RT without concurrent chemotherapy; bolus and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) are permitted; lymph node irradiation (i.e., internal mammary nodes, supraclavicular nodes, axillary nodes, etc) as part of their prescribed radiation therapy are permitted; conventional fractionated radiation therapy regimens eligible for study are described below: * Minimal (min) total dose: whole breast: 44 gray (Gy); breast boost: 10 Gy; tumor bed = whole breast +/- boost: 50.0 Gy; lymph nodes: 45 Gy * Maximal (max) total dose: whole breast: 50.4 Gy; breast boost: 20 Gy; tumor bed = whole breast +/- boost: 66.0 Gy; lymph nodes: 50.4 Gy * Min dose per fraction: whole breast: 1.8 Gy; breast boost: 2.0 Gy; tumor bed = whole breast +/- boost: 1.8 Gy; lymph nodes: 1.8 Gy * Max dose per fraction: whole breast: 2.0 Gy; breast boost: 2.0 Gy; tumor bed = whole breast +/- boost: 2.0 Gy; lymph nodes: 2.0 Gy * Min # of fractions: whole breast: 22 Gy; breast boost: 5 Gy; tumor bed = whole breast +/- boost: 25 Gy; lymph nodes: 25 Gy * Max # of fractions: whole breast: 28 Gy; breast boost: 10 Gy; tumor bed = whole breast +/- boost: 36 Gy; lymph nodes: 28 Gy * Min # of sessions: whole breast: 22 Gy; breast boost: 5 Gy; tumor bed = whole breast +/- boost: 25 Gy; lymph nodes: 25 Gy * Max # of sessions: whole breast: 28 Gy; breast boost: 10 Gy; tumor bed = whole breast +/- boost: 36 Gy; lymph nodes: 28 Gy * Subjects may or may not have had surgery (lumpectomy or mastectomy) prior to RT; (NOTE: surgery is not required for eligibility) * Subjects may have had chemotherapy prior to radiation; a minimum of two weeks is required between end of chemotherapy and start of RT * Subjects may be currently prescribed hormone treatment or Herceptin therapy * Subjects must be able to read, speak, and understand English * Subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document * Subjects must agree to not use any other topical agents on skin in the radiation treatment area during the course of this trial; subjects should only use topical agents for the study (i.e., topical intervention or standard care agents) supplied by the study personnel and/or treating physician

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant females are ineligible; all subjects of childbearing potential will be asked if they are pregnant or could be pregnant; the patient must respond no to continue with radiation and to participate in this clinical study * Subjects with bilateral breast cancer are not eligible * Subjects receiving the short-course fractionation radiation therapy (i.e., 16 sessions or 20 sessions at 2.4 to 2.6 Gy fractions per session, with or without boost) * Subject is currently on anti-EGFR (human epidermal growth factor receptor) therapy, such as Iressa (gefitinib) or Erbitux (cetuximab, C225) * Previous radiation to the chest or breast * Subjects with breast reconstruction prior to RT * Previous diagnosis of radiosensitivity disorder (i.e., ataxia telangiectasia) * Previous diagnosis of collagen vascular disorder or vasculitis * Presence of unhealed surgical wounds in chest or breast region and/or breast infection * Current daily application of a prescribed topical product to the skin within the RT area for an unrelated skin condition that cannot be discontinued during the participation in this clinical trial * Presence of any active dermatological issues in radiation treatment area (i.e., fungal skin infection, dermatitis, psoriasis plaques, etc)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Radiation Dermatitis Severity (RDS) Score. Range: 0 (no Dermatitis) - 4 (Violaceous Erythema With Diffuse Desquamation Occurring in Sheets; Patchy Crusting; Superficial Ulceration)Baseline up to 1 week post radiation therapyThe mean 1 week post-RT RDS score for each arm will be compared using ANOVA to determine if the topical interventions reduce the severity of skin reactions at the end of RT. The RDS score ranges from 0-4 with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
Incidence of Moist Desquamation (Present vs. Absent)Baseline up to completion of radiation therapyThe degree to which each topical intervention decreases the incidence of moist desquamation will be examined using Fisher's exact test. Each agent's potential as a preventative intervention will be determined through comparison of the proportion of subjects with no to minimal radiation dermatitis within each arm using Fisher's exact test.
Change in the Severity of Skin Reactions Using the Radiation Dermatitis Scale (RDS). Range: 0 (no Dermatitis) - 4 (Violaceous Erythema With Diffuse Desquamation Occurring in Sheets; Patchy Crusting; Superficial Ulceration)Baseline to up to 1 week after completion of radiation therapyThe mean 1 week post-RT RDS score for each arm will be compared using ANOVA to determine if the topical interventions reduce the severity of skin reactions after completion of RT. The RDS score ranges from 0-4 with higher scores indicating worse outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm I (Curcumin-based Gel)
Patients apply curcumin-based gel topically TID approximately every 4-6 hours beginning on the first day of radiation therapy and continuing until 1 week after completion of radiation therapy. Curcumin-based Gel: Applied topically Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
64
Arm II (HPR Plus)
Patients apply HPR Plus™ topically TID approximately every 4-6 hours beginning on the first day of radiation therapy and continuing until 1 week after completion of radiation therapy. Dermatologic Complications Management: Apply HPR Plus topically Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
65
Arm III (Placebo Gel)
Patients apply placebo gel topically TID approximately every 4-6 hours beginning on the first day of radiation therapy and continuing until 1 week after completion of radiation therapy. Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Placebo: Apply placebo gel topically Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
62
Total191

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyChanged Mind010
Overall StudyDid Not Start RT010
Overall StudyDisliked Intervention111
Overall StudyDisliked Study Procedures001
Overall StudyIneligible010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up100
Overall StudyNo Reason101
Overall StudyPersonal Issues011
Overall StudyPossibly Related Adverse Event001
Overall StudyRelated Adverse Event010
Overall StudyTreatment or Change Delay001
Overall StudyUnrelated Adverse Event103
Overall StudyWithdrew (Unrelated Medical)100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalArm I (Curcumin-based Gel)Arm II (HPR Plus)Arm III (Placebo Gel)
Age, Continuous59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
59.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
60.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
Breast Field Separation23.1 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
22.6 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
23.8 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
22.8 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
Currently on Herceptin Treatment
No
170 Participants56 Participants56 Participants58 Participants
Currently on Herceptin Treatment
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Currently on Herceptin Treatment
Yes
19 Participants8 Participants8 Participants3 Participants
Currently on Hormone Therapy
No
148 Participants52 Participants48 Participants48 Participants
Currently on Hormone Therapy
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Currently on Hormone Therapy
Yes
41 Participants12 Participants16 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
186 Participants62 Participants63 Participants61 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Location of Breast Cancer
Left
86 Participants29 Participants27 Participants30 Participants
Location of Breast Cancer
Right
103 Participants35 Participants37 Participants31 Participants
Location of Breast Cancer
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Marital Status
Divorced
30 Participants5 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Marital Status
Domestic Partner
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Marital Status
Married
119 Participants45 Participants37 Participants37 Participants
Marital Status
Separated
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Marital Status
Single
18 Participants8 Participants8 Participants2 Participants
Marital Status
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Marital Status
Widowed
19 Participants5 Participants10 Participants4 Participants
Prior Chemotherapy
No
99 Participants30 Participants35 Participants34 Participants
Prior Chemotherapy
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Prior Chemotherapy
Yes
90 Participants34 Participants29 Participants27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
21 Participants8 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
167 Participants55 Participants55 Participants57 Participants
Radiation Boost Planned
No
9 Participants4 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Radiation Boost Planned
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Radiation Boost Planned
Yes
180 Participants60 Participants61 Participants59 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
191 Participants64 Participants65 Participants62 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Stage of Disease
DCIS
28 Participants5 Participants12 Participants11 Participants
Stage of Disease
Stage I
85 Participants34 Participants29 Participants22 Participants
Stage of Disease
Stage II
54 Participants16 Participants18 Participants20 Participants
Stage of Disease
Stage III
20 Participants7 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Stage of Disease
Stage IV
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Stage of Disease
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Total Radiation Dose Prescribed59.0 Gray units
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
58.4 Gray units
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
59.5 Gray units
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
59.1 Gray units
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
Type of Radiation
3D Conformal Whole Breast
184 Participants63 Participants62 Participants59 Participants
Type of Radiation
IMRT
5 Participants1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Type of Radiation
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 641 / 650 / 62
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 643 / 655 / 62
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 642 / 656 / 62

Outcome results

Primary

Change in the Severity of Skin Reactions Using the Radiation Dermatitis Scale (RDS). Range: 0 (no Dermatitis) - 4 (Violaceous Erythema With Diffuse Desquamation Occurring in Sheets; Patchy Crusting; Superficial Ulceration)

The mean 1 week post-RT RDS score for each arm will be compared using ANOVA to determine if the topical interventions reduce the severity of skin reactions after completion of RT. The RDS score ranges from 0-4 with higher scores indicating worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to up to 1 week after completion of radiation therapy

Population: Note: Of the 64 who were randomized to Arm 1, 60 completed 1-week post; of the 65 who were randomized to Arm II, 58 completed 1-week post; of the 62 who were randomized to Arm III, 52 completed 1-week post.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Curcumin-based Gel)Change in the Severity of Skin Reactions Using the Radiation Dermatitis Scale (RDS). Range: 0 (no Dermatitis) - 4 (Violaceous Erythema With Diffuse Desquamation Occurring in Sheets; Patchy Crusting; Superficial Ulceration)2.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Arm II (HPR Plus)Change in the Severity of Skin Reactions Using the Radiation Dermatitis Scale (RDS). Range: 0 (no Dermatitis) - 4 (Violaceous Erythema With Diffuse Desquamation Occurring in Sheets; Patchy Crusting; Superficial Ulceration)2.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Arm III (Placebo Gel)Change in the Severity of Skin Reactions Using the Radiation Dermatitis Scale (RDS). Range: 0 (no Dermatitis) - 4 (Violaceous Erythema With Diffuse Desquamation Occurring in Sheets; Patchy Crusting; Superficial Ulceration)2.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
p-value: 0.8591ANOVA
Primary

Incidence of Moist Desquamation (Present vs. Absent)

The degree to which each topical intervention decreases the incidence of moist desquamation will be examined using Fisher's exact test. Each agent's potential as a preventative intervention will be determined through comparison of the proportion of subjects with no to minimal radiation dermatitis within each arm using Fisher's exact test.

Time frame: Baseline up to completion of radiation therapy

Population: Note: Of the 64 who were randomized to Arm 1, 59 completed the study; of the 65 who were randomized to Arm II, 59 completed the study; of the 62 who were randomized to Arm III, 53 completed the study

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm I (Curcumin-based Gel)Incidence of Moist Desquamation (Present vs. Absent)No Moist Desquamation44 Participants
Arm I (Curcumin-based Gel)Incidence of Moist Desquamation (Present vs. Absent)Moist Desquamation15 Participants
Arm II (HPR Plus)Incidence of Moist Desquamation (Present vs. Absent)No Moist Desquamation47 Participants
Arm II (HPR Plus)Incidence of Moist Desquamation (Present vs. Absent)Moist Desquamation12 Participants
Arm III (Placebo Gel)Incidence of Moist Desquamation (Present vs. Absent)No Moist Desquamation41 Participants
Arm III (Placebo Gel)Incidence of Moist Desquamation (Present vs. Absent)Moist Desquamation12 Participants
p-value: 0.8048Fisher Exact
Primary

Mean Radiation Dermatitis Severity (RDS) Score. Range: 0 (no Dermatitis) - 4 (Violaceous Erythema With Diffuse Desquamation Occurring in Sheets; Patchy Crusting; Superficial Ulceration)

The mean 1 week post-RT RDS score for each arm will be compared using ANOVA to determine if the topical interventions reduce the severity of skin reactions at the end of RT. The RDS score ranges from 0-4 with higher scores indicating worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline up to 1 week post radiation therapy

Population: Note: Of the 64 who were randomized to Arm 1, 59 completed the study; of the 65 who were randomized to Arm II, 59 completed the study; of the 62 who were randomized to Arm III, 53 completed the study

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm I (Curcumin-based Gel)Mean Radiation Dermatitis Severity (RDS) Score. Range: 0 (no Dermatitis) - 4 (Violaceous Erythema With Diffuse Desquamation Occurring in Sheets; Patchy Crusting; Superficial Ulceration)2.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Arm II (HPR Plus)Mean Radiation Dermatitis Severity (RDS) Score. Range: 0 (no Dermatitis) - 4 (Violaceous Erythema With Diffuse Desquamation Occurring in Sheets; Patchy Crusting; Superficial Ulceration)2.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Arm III (Placebo Gel)Mean Radiation Dermatitis Severity (RDS) Score. Range: 0 (no Dermatitis) - 4 (Violaceous Erythema With Diffuse Desquamation Occurring in Sheets; Patchy Crusting; Superficial Ulceration)2.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
p-value: 0.9306ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026