Skip to content

Efficacy of Cognitive Training in Subjective Memory Impairment

A Prospective, Three-arm, Parallel Design, Controlled Trial to Assess Efficacy of Cognitive Training in Subjective Memory Impairment

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02555774
Enrollment
65
Registered
2015-09-22
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2018-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Memory Loss

Keywords

subjective memory impairment, cognitive training

Brief summary

This study evaluates the efficacy of cognitive training in subjects with subjective memory impairment. The first group will receive cognitive training and lifestyle modification in combination, the second group will receive only lifestyle modification, and the third group will receive no intervention.

Detailed description

Subjective memory impairment is currently thought to be a risky state of progression to Alzheimer's disease. This study aims to confirm whether cognitive training in subjective memory impairment would show improvement in the subjective and objective cognition. We include subjects with normal cognition but complained subjective feeling of memory decline and conduct cognitive training programs combined with lifestyle modifications for 3 months. We evaluate the neuropsychological tests and questionnaires about subjective improvement after 3 months of interventions.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALcognitive training

cognitive training is held 2 times a week for 3 months, 90 minutes per 1 session. It includes cognitive exercise of multiple cognitive domains such as memory, attention, calculation, executive function and visuospatial function.

BEHAVIORALlifestyle modification

education about lifestyle modification is done by investigators at the first day of the trial and the investigators conduct weekly phone call to participants to educate the lifestyle modifications

Sponsors

Asan Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects who showed normal range (above 16percentile of norm) in all domains of detailed neuropsychological tests battery named Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB) * Clinical dementia rating (CDR) score of 0 * Subjects with at least 3 years of formal education

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with mild cognitive impairment or dementia * Subjects who was diagnosed as any neurological disorders such as epilepsy, stroke, hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, Parkinson's disease or brain tumor * Subjects with uncontrolled severe medical conditions according to investigator's opinion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Paired associates learning test3 monthpaired associates learning test is a part of computerized neuropsychological tests battery named CANTAB (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery). The scores are shown as total number of errors.
Rapid visual information processing test3 monthrapid visual information processing is a part of computerized neuropsychological test battery named CANTAB. The score is shown as correct response rate.%
Pattern recognition memory test3 monthpaired associates learning test is a part of computerized neuropsychological tests battery named CANTAB (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery). The score is shown as correct response rate.%
Spatial working memory test3 monthpaired associates learning test is a part of computerized neuropsychological tests battery named CANTAB (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery). The scores are shown as total number of errors.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Seoul instrumental activities of daily living3 monthscale for measuring activities of daily living limitation. score range 0-45. low score means better ability.
Rey complex figure copy test3 monthtest for visuospatial function. Participants should copy the complex figure. score range: 0-36. Higher score means better visuospatial function.
Digit symbol test3 montha test for attention and psychomotor speed. Participants are instructed to write an appropriately matched code for each number. Correct number is counted. score range: 0-76. Higher score means better function.
cognitive failure questionnaire3 monthquestionnaire for measuring self reported cognitive status. score range: 0-100. Higher score means worse cognitive status.
Seoul verbal learning test, delayed recall3 monthmeasuring tool for 20 minutes delayed memory function. After 20 minutes from the immediate recall test, participants should remember the words. score range: 0-12. Higher score means better delayed memory function
Logical memory test, delayed recall3 monthlogical memory test is a part of a neuropsychological test named Wechsler
Seoul verbal learning test, immediate recall3 monthmeasuring tool for immediate memory function. Investigators read 12 words to participants. Participants should remember the words. Tests are done 3 times. score range: 0-36. Higher score means better immediate memory function
Mini-mental state examination3 monthmini-mental state examination that examines general cognition. range 0-20. Higher score means better cognition.
Geriatric depression scale3 monthquestionnaire for depression measuring. score range:0-15. lower score means less depression.
Beck anxiety index3 monthquestionnaire for self reporting anxiety measuring. range:0-63. low score means less anxiety.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026