Validation Studies
Conditions
Brief summary
Integration of the REM-verification within the fitting workflow will enable the hearing care professional to easily run real ear measurements. The purpose of the two study parts is to prove that an integrated cooperative system, consisting of fitting software and measurement system, matches desired responses for certain stimuli faster, more reliably and more precisely at the ear drums of hearing instrument wearers than current best practice processes.
Interventions
The subjects individual response of the ear canal gets measured with the help of a probe tube and a following hearing aid fitting.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Clean and healthy ear canal, eardrum and pinna * Ability to keep current position (of head and body) during a period of about 5 minutes while seated.
Exclusion criteria
* Ear infections * Ear wax in the ear * Hyperacusis * Pacemaker * Tremor * Disability to keep position.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Distance (mm) from probe tube to eardrum measurement | 1 month | Precise of the Probe Tube placement |
| Procedure time (min) of fitting workflow including Real Ear measurement | 2 month | In addition to the outcome measurement time (in minutes) further outcome measurements can be obtained due to the performed real ear measurement procedure itself. Data that give information pertaining to test reliability (in dB) and precision of hearing aid fitting (in dB). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective rating of unpleasantness (0 = not unpleasant at all, 10 = very unpleasant) | 1 month | Pleasantness during the probe tube placement |
| Questionnaire about perceived annoyance | 2 month | Perceived annoyance of the hearing care professional and the test subject measured with a questionnaire including rating scales for stessful and boring. |
Countries
Switzerland