Skip to content

A Bilateral Dispensing Clinical Trial of an Sapphire Lens Against Senofilcon A Toric for Astigmatism Lens

A Bilateral Dispensing Clinical Trial of Sapphire Lens Against Senofilcon A Toric for Astigmatism Lens Over 2 Weeks

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02555098
Enrollment
23
Registered
2015-09-21
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2020-10-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Astigmatism

Brief summary

This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of an investigational silicone-hydrogel lens against Senofilcon A toric lens. The study results were not used for design validation of the investigational product.

Detailed description

This will be a randomized, bilateral, 2-week cross-over, double-masked, dispensing study comparing the investigational test lens against the Senofilcon A Toric for Astigmatism control lens.

Interventions

DEVICESapphire contact lenses

Each subject randomized to wear either the test or control contact lenses as a matched pair and cross over to the second matched pair

Each subject randomized to wear either the test or control contact lenses as a matched pair and cross over to the second matched pair

Sponsors

CooperVision, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if they: 1. Are at least 18 years of age and have full legal capacity to volunteer; 2. Have read and signed an information consent letter; 3. Are willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule; 4. Are an adapted soft contact lens wearer; 5. Require spectacle lens powers in both eyes; 1. Sphere: between -1.75 to -6.00 diopters and 2. Astigmatism: between -1.00 to -2.25 and 3. Axis: 180 ± 20 degrees 6. Are willing to wear contact lenses in both eyes; 7. Have manifest refraction visual acuities (VA) equal to or better than logMAR (log of the minimum angle of resolution) equivalent of 20/25 in each eye; 8. To be eligible for lens dispensing, the subject must have VA of logMAR equivalent of 20/30 or better in each eye with the study lenses and the investigator must judge the fit including toric orientation as acceptable.

Exclusion criteria

* A person will be excluded from the study if they: 1. Are participating in any concurrent clinical or research study; 2. Have any known active\* ocular disease and/or infection; 3. Have a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable; 4. Are using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable; 5. Have known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study; 6. Are pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment (by verbal confirmation at the screening visit); 7. Are aphakic; 8. Have undergone refractive error surgery;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Ratings for ComfortBaseline (10 minutes post lens settling)Scale 0-100; (0=Cannot be worn; 100=Cannot be felt ever)
Subjective Ratings for Comfort PreferenceBaseline (10 minutes post lens settling)Subjective Ratings for Comfort Preference: Sapphire lens, senofilcon A lens, No preference
Subjective Assessment of Visual QualityBaseline (10 minutes post lens settling)Subjective assessment of visual quality assessed on a Scale: 0-100 (0=Extremely poor vision all of the time; Cannot function; 100=Excellent vision all of the time)
Subjective Assessment of Overall SatisfactionBaseline (10 minutes post lens settling)Subjective assessment of overall satisfaction on a Scale: 0-100: (0=Extremely dissatisfied; 100=Extremely satisfied)
Subjective Overall PreferenceBaseline (10 minutes post lens settling)Subjective Overall Preference: Sapphire lens, senofilcon A lens, No preference

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study
Each subject randomized to wear either the Sapphire lenses (test) or senofilcon A contact lenses (control) as a matched pair for two weeks and cross over to the second matched pair for two weeks.
23
Total23

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
23 Participants
Age, Continuous40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
23 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 230 / 23
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 230 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 230 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Subjective Assessment of Overall Satisfaction

Subjective assessment of overall satisfaction on a Scale: 0-100: (0=Extremely dissatisfied; 100=Extremely satisfied)

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sapphire LensesSubjective Assessment of Overall Satisfaction87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Senofilcon ASubjective Assessment of Overall Satisfaction73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30
Primary

Subjective Assessment of Overall Satisfaction

Subjective assessment of overall satisfaction on a Scale: 0-100: (0=Extremely dissatisfied; 100=Extremely satisfied)

Time frame: Baseline (10 minutes post lens settling)

Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sapphire LensesSubjective Assessment of Overall Satisfaction89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Senofilcon ASubjective Assessment of Overall Satisfaction81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Primary

Subjective Assessment of Visual Quality

Subjective assessment of visual quality assessed on a Scale: 0-100 (0=Extremely poor vision all of the time; Cannot function; 100=Excellent vision all of the time)

Time frame: Baseline (10 minutes post lens settling)

Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sapphire LensesSubjective Assessment of Visual Quality85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Senofilcon ASubjective Assessment of Visual Quality85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Primary

Subjective Assessment of Visual Quality

Subjective assessment of visual quality assessed on a Scale: 0-100 (0=Extremely poor vision all of the time; Cannot function; 100=Excellent vision all of the time)

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sapphire LensesSubjective Assessment of Visual Quality81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Senofilcon ASubjective Assessment of Visual Quality73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
Primary

Subjective Overall Preference

Subjective Overall Preference: Sapphire lens, senofilcon A lens, No preference

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sapphire LensesSubjective Overall PreferenceSapphire Lens73 percentage of participants
Sapphire LensesSubjective Overall PreferenceNo Preference4 percentage of participants
Sapphire LensesSubjective Overall Preferencesenofilcon A23 percentage of participants
Primary

Subjective Overall Preference

Subjective Overall Preference: Sapphire lens, senofilcon A lens, No preference

Time frame: Baseline (10 minutes post lens settling)

Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sapphire LensesSubjective Overall PreferenceSapphire Lens55 percentage of participants
Sapphire LensesSubjective Overall PreferenceNo Preference18 percentage of participants
Sapphire LensesSubjective Overall Preferencesenofilcon A27 percentage of participants
Primary

Subjective Ratings for Comfort

Scale 0-100; (0=Cannot be worn; 100=Cannot be felt ever)

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sapphire LensesSubjective Ratings for Comfort85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
Senofilcon ASubjective Ratings for Comfort72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
Primary

Subjective Ratings for Comfort

Scale 0-100; (0=Cannot be worn; 100=Cannot be felt ever)

Time frame: Baseline (10 minutes post lens settling)

Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sapphire LensesSubjective Ratings for Comfort89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Senofilcon ASubjective Ratings for Comfort80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Primary

Subjective Ratings for Comfort Preference

Subjective Ratings for Comfort Preference: Sapphire lens, senofilcon A lens, No preference

Time frame: Baseline (10 minutes post lens settling)

Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sapphire LensesSubjective Ratings for Comfort PreferenceSapphire lens46 percentage of participants
Sapphire LensesSubjective Ratings for Comfort Preferencesenofilcon A18 percentage of participants
Sapphire LensesSubjective Ratings for Comfort PreferenceNo Preference36 percentage of participants
Primary

Subjective Ratings for Comfort Preference

Subjective Ratings for Comfort Preference: Sapphire lens, senofilcon A lens, No preference

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sapphire LensesSubjective Ratings for Comfort PreferenceSapphire lens68 percentage of participants
Sapphire LensesSubjective Ratings for Comfort Preferencesenofilcon A27 percentage of participants
Sapphire LensesSubjective Ratings for Comfort PreferenceNo Preference5 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026