Astigmatism
Conditions
Brief summary
This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of an investigational silicone-hydrogel lens against Senofilcon A toric lens. The study results were not used for design validation of the investigational product.
Detailed description
This will be a randomized, bilateral, 2-week cross-over, double-masked, dispensing study comparing the investigational test lens against the Senofilcon A Toric for Astigmatism control lens.
Interventions
Each subject randomized to wear either the test or control contact lenses as a matched pair and cross over to the second matched pair
Each subject randomized to wear either the test or control contact lenses as a matched pair and cross over to the second matched pair
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if they: 1. Are at least 18 years of age and have full legal capacity to volunteer; 2. Have read and signed an information consent letter; 3. Are willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule; 4. Are an adapted soft contact lens wearer; 5. Require spectacle lens powers in both eyes; 1. Sphere: between -1.75 to -6.00 diopters and 2. Astigmatism: between -1.00 to -2.25 and 3. Axis: 180 ± 20 degrees 6. Are willing to wear contact lenses in both eyes; 7. Have manifest refraction visual acuities (VA) equal to or better than logMAR (log of the minimum angle of resolution) equivalent of 20/25 in each eye; 8. To be eligible for lens dispensing, the subject must have VA of logMAR equivalent of 20/30 or better in each eye with the study lenses and the investigator must judge the fit including toric orientation as acceptable.
Exclusion criteria
* A person will be excluded from the study if they: 1. Are participating in any concurrent clinical or research study; 2. Have any known active\* ocular disease and/or infection; 3. Have a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable; 4. Are using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable; 5. Have known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study; 6. Are pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment (by verbal confirmation at the screening visit); 7. Are aphakic; 8. Have undergone refractive error surgery;
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective Ratings for Comfort | Baseline (10 minutes post lens settling) | Scale 0-100; (0=Cannot be worn; 100=Cannot be felt ever) |
| Subjective Ratings for Comfort Preference | Baseline (10 minutes post lens settling) | Subjective Ratings for Comfort Preference: Sapphire lens, senofilcon A lens, No preference |
| Subjective Assessment of Visual Quality | Baseline (10 minutes post lens settling) | Subjective assessment of visual quality assessed on a Scale: 0-100 (0=Extremely poor vision all of the time; Cannot function; 100=Excellent vision all of the time) |
| Subjective Assessment of Overall Satisfaction | Baseline (10 minutes post lens settling) | Subjective assessment of overall satisfaction on a Scale: 0-100: (0=Extremely dissatisfied; 100=Extremely satisfied) |
| Subjective Overall Preference | Baseline (10 minutes post lens settling) | Subjective Overall Preference: Sapphire lens, senofilcon A lens, No preference |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Overall Study Each subject randomized to wear either the Sapphire lenses (test) or senofilcon A contact lenses (control) as a matched pair for two weeks and cross over to the second matched pair for two weeks. | 23 |
| Total | 23 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Overall Study | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | — |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | — |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 23 Participants | — |
| Age, Continuous | 40 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 23 participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 20 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 3 Participants | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 23 | 0 / 23 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 23 | 0 / 23 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 23 | 0 / 23 |
Outcome results
Subjective Assessment of Overall Satisfaction
Subjective assessment of overall satisfaction on a Scale: 0-100: (0=Extremely dissatisfied; 100=Extremely satisfied)
Time frame: 2 weeks
Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Assessment of Overall Satisfaction | 87 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14 |
| Senofilcon A | Subjective Assessment of Overall Satisfaction | 73 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 30 |
Subjective Assessment of Overall Satisfaction
Subjective assessment of overall satisfaction on a Scale: 0-100: (0=Extremely dissatisfied; 100=Extremely satisfied)
Time frame: Baseline (10 minutes post lens settling)
Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Assessment of Overall Satisfaction | 89 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12 |
| Senofilcon A | Subjective Assessment of Overall Satisfaction | 81 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21 |
Subjective Assessment of Visual Quality
Subjective assessment of visual quality assessed on a Scale: 0-100 (0=Extremely poor vision all of the time; Cannot function; 100=Excellent vision all of the time)
Time frame: Baseline (10 minutes post lens settling)
Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Assessment of Visual Quality | 85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15 |
| Senofilcon A | Subjective Assessment of Visual Quality | 85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21 |
Subjective Assessment of Visual Quality
Subjective assessment of visual quality assessed on a Scale: 0-100 (0=Extremely poor vision all of the time; Cannot function; 100=Excellent vision all of the time)
Time frame: 2 weeks
Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Assessment of Visual Quality | 81 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19 |
| Senofilcon A | Subjective Assessment of Visual Quality | 73 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 27 |
Subjective Overall Preference
Subjective Overall Preference: Sapphire lens, senofilcon A lens, No preference
Time frame: 2 weeks
Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Overall Preference | Sapphire Lens | 73 percentage of participants |
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Overall Preference | No Preference | 4 percentage of participants |
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Overall Preference | senofilcon A | 23 percentage of participants |
Subjective Overall Preference
Subjective Overall Preference: Sapphire lens, senofilcon A lens, No preference
Time frame: Baseline (10 minutes post lens settling)
Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Overall Preference | Sapphire Lens | 55 percentage of participants |
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Overall Preference | No Preference | 18 percentage of participants |
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Overall Preference | senofilcon A | 27 percentage of participants |
Subjective Ratings for Comfort
Scale 0-100; (0=Cannot be worn; 100=Cannot be felt ever)
Time frame: 2 weeks
Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Ratings for Comfort | 85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18 |
| Senofilcon A | Subjective Ratings for Comfort | 72 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 27 |
Subjective Ratings for Comfort
Scale 0-100; (0=Cannot be worn; 100=Cannot be felt ever)
Time frame: Baseline (10 minutes post lens settling)
Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Ratings for Comfort | 89 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14 |
| Senofilcon A | Subjective Ratings for Comfort | 80 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20 |
Subjective Ratings for Comfort Preference
Subjective Ratings for Comfort Preference: Sapphire lens, senofilcon A lens, No preference
Time frame: Baseline (10 minutes post lens settling)
Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Ratings for Comfort Preference | Sapphire lens | 46 percentage of participants |
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Ratings for Comfort Preference | senofilcon A | 18 percentage of participants |
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Ratings for Comfort Preference | No Preference | 36 percentage of participants |
Subjective Ratings for Comfort Preference
Subjective Ratings for Comfort Preference: Sapphire lens, senofilcon A lens, No preference
Time frame: 2 weeks
Population: One subject was excluded from the analysis due to compliance.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Ratings for Comfort Preference | Sapphire lens | 68 percentage of participants |
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Ratings for Comfort Preference | senofilcon A | 27 percentage of participants |
| Sapphire Lenses | Subjective Ratings for Comfort Preference | No Preference | 5 percentage of participants |