Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
Stroke Rehabilitation, BCI, Stroke, Upper Extremity Rehabilitation, paresis, hemiparesis
Brief summary
The ultimate goal of this project is to develop a functioning and clinically feasible method for restoring function to motor-impaired stroke survivors. This ultimate goal will be approached through two different means. The first method is to develop a functioning brain-computer interface that operates based on cortical activity ipsilateral to an intended movement on the motor-impaired side of the body. And secondly, to develop new methods of rehabilitation that involve stimulating peripheral muscles based upon cortical activity ipsilateral to intended movements. Finally, the study seeks to assess changes in functional connectivity as a result of using a BCI device.
Detailed description
This study will be carried out in two phases designed to achieve the objectives described above. The first phase will determine the feasibility of recording ipsilateral (contralesional) motor commands and use the signals to control a computer. This phase will involve recording EEG signals during the performance of real and imagined motor movements of both the impaired and non-impaired hand in stroke survivors. After recording the signals and analyzing the data, the signals will be used to try to control a cursor on a computer screen or a robotic hand. The second phase of the study will determine if the BCI system can be used to impact rehabilitation. Motor commands would be performed as in phase 1 to determine the accompanying EEG signals. The EEG signals would then be used to control stimulation of the impaired limb. Rehabilitation would be assessed by examining changes in commonly used functional motor scores. The ultimate goal of this project is to develop a functioning and clinically feasible method for restoring function to motor-impaired stroke survivors. This ultimate goal will be approached through two different means. The first method is to develop a functioning brain-computer interface that operates based on cortical activity ipsilateral to an intended movement on the motor-impaired side of the body. And secondly, to develop new methods of rehabilitation that involve stimulating peripheral muscles based upon cortical activity ipsilateral to intended movements. Finally, the study seeks to assess changes in functional connectivity as a result of using a BCI device.
Interventions
DEVICEIpsiHand Device
Once a participant has completed (3) EEG Signal Screens and (2) separate set of baseline measurements, the IpsiHand BCI Device is provided to participants to use a minimum of (5) out of (7) days a week for a total duration of 12 weeks. Participants are seen bi-weekly throughout the duration of the trial to assess affected upper extremity and assess functional impact. At the completion of 12 weeks of device use, the participants complete a set of measurements to assess function of the affected upper extremity.
Sponsors
Washington University School of Medicine
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 88 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* 6 months post stroke * Modified Ashworth Scale of 1+ or less of elbow flexion in the affected upper extremity * Short Blessed Test Score of 8 or less * Unstructured Mesulam with 2 or less omissions
Exclusion criteria
* Dementia * Severe spasticity in affected upper extremity * Unilateral Visual Inattention (neglect) * Contracture(s) in the affected upper extremity * Botox injections administered within 9 months * Aphasia which limits effective communication
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Score | Baseline and 12 weeks | The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is an evaluative measure to assess specific changes in limb function among individuals who sustained cortical damage resulting in hemiplegia (Lyle, 1981). It assesses a client's ability to handle objects differing in size, weight and shape and therefore can be considered to be an arm-specific measure of activity limitation (Platz, Pinkowski, Kim, di Bella, & Johnson, 2005). The ARAT's is a 19 item measure divided into 4 sub-tests (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement). Performance on each item is rated on a 4-point ordinal scale ranging from: 3\) Performs test normally 2) Completes test, but takes abnormally long or has great difficulty 1\) Performs test partially 0) Can perform no part of test The maximum score achievable on this measure is 57 points. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) | Baseline and 12 weeks | The COPM is an evidence-based outcome measure designed to capture a client's self-perception of performance in 5 patient-identified tasks over time. Patients identified 5 functional activities that they wanted to perform more independently or with greater ease. COPM measurements consisted of a semi-structured interview in which patients rated their performance & satisfaction with each activity on an ordinal scale from 1 to 10. A performance score of 1 indicated they are unable to perform identified task, & a score of 10 indicates they are able to complete the functional task as easy as prior to stroke. A satisfaction score of 1 indicated they were not satisfied at all to 10 indicating they are extremely satisfied with how they complete the identified functional task. Patients would rate (5) functional tasks for their performance and satisfaction. Scores were averaged between the scores from the 5 functional activities. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Experimental IpsiHand is a device which includes a robotic glove that you wear on your hand and a headset that you wear on your head. The headset picks up your thoughts and sends them to the robotic glove, to control opening and closing of your hand.
IpsiHand Device: Once a participant has completed (3) EEG Signal Screens and (2) separate set of baseline measurements, the IpsiHand BCI Device is provided to participants to use a minimum of (5) out of (7) days a week for a total duration of 12 weeks. Participants are seen bi-weekly throughout the duration of the trial to assess affected upper extremity and assess functional impact. At the completion of 12 weeks of device use, the participants complete a set of measurements to assess function of the affected upper extremity. | 10 |
| Total | 10 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Experimental | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | — |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 4 Participants | — |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 6 Participants | — |
| Age, Continuous | 58.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 10 participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 1 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 9 Participants | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 23 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 23 |
Outcome results
Primary
Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Score
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is an evaluative measure to assess specific changes in limb function among individuals who sustained cortical damage resulting in hemiplegia (Lyle, 1981). It assesses a client's ability to handle objects differing in size, weight and shape and therefore can be considered to be an arm-specific measure of activity limitation (Platz, Pinkowski, Kim, di Bella, & Johnson, 2005). The ARAT's is a 19 item measure divided into 4 sub-tests (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement). Performance on each item is rated on a 4-point ordinal scale ranging from: 3\) Performs test normally 2) Completes test, but takes abnormally long or has great difficulty 1\) Performs test partially 0) Can perform no part of test The maximum score achievable on this measure is 57 points.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Change in ARAT From Baseline to 12 Weeks of BCI Device Use | Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Score | 6.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
p-value: 0.002Paired t-Test
Secondary
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
The COPM is an evidence-based outcome measure designed to capture a client's self-perception of performance in 5 patient-identified tasks over time. Patients identified 5 functional activities that they wanted to perform more independently or with greater ease. COPM measurements consisted of a semi-structured interview in which patients rated their performance & satisfaction with each activity on an ordinal scale from 1 to 10. A performance score of 1 indicated they are unable to perform identified task, & a score of 10 indicates they are able to complete the functional task as easy as prior to stroke. A satisfaction score of 1 indicated they were not satisfied at all to 10 indicating they are extremely satisfied with how they complete the identified functional task. Patients would rate (5) functional tasks for their performance and satisfaction. Scores were averaged between the scores from the 5 functional activities.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in ARAT From Baseline to 12 Weeks of BCI Device Use | Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) | Performance | 1.56 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| Change in ARAT From Baseline to 12 Weeks of BCI Device Use | Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) | Satisfaction | 1.54 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.86 |
Comparison: Signed-Rank Test for Performance COPM between Baseline and 12 weeksp-value: 0.022Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Signed-Rank Test for Satisfaction COPM between Baseline and 12 weeksp-value: 0.031Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)